He knows the tory line, trots it out confidently, looks the part. Why not? Who else? My true nightmare is Chris “cunt” Philp.The respondents in that poll cited by Peston are a cohort of the population who see James "Cleverly" as the best option. I mean really? I know there's a poverty of any ability within this decaying entity that is Rat-boy's cabinet, but "Cleverly"?
It’s a long time ago that Dallas. I remember Sue Ellen being bullied by JR a lot, being bladdered all the time and taking having a weep to higher levels.
There is an argument that Sunak has placed both Lee Anderson and Braverman in positions of power to sat and do things that will appeal to the kind of right wing Tories Sunak had never been able to build a support base with (cunts, in short).
She is speaking at the covid inquiry right now and even when discussing important topics such as lockdown-related domestic abuse, the words are largely empty and unimpressive, with only a few exceptions that break past politics. She does know how to say the right thing on these themes, even though its largely empty talk, which is more than we can say about Braverman.I miss PritiThose were the days.
In a sense, you're right, it really doesn't matter who leads the party.
If ever there was an occasion that could benefit from Govt-sponsored agent provocateurs, I'd suggest Saturday would be it.
Maybe we can use this as a test as to whether they indulge in that sort of thing much less than they used to.
They use the dog whistle stuff and the main blowers of those whistles for all sorts of reasons. Im not sure they need it as cover for fossil fuel stuff in particular, as they seem quite happy to be pretty naked on those fronts.
The fash will turn up to 'guard' the Cenotaph. They'll be surrounded by a cordon of coppers. And the marchers will pass by barely noticing them.
Actually, I hope he continues to exhibit his cojone deficiency. She WANTS to be sacked, because that would give her Loon Credibility with the chancers, headbangers, and unhinged wing of the Tory party, and thus facilitate a leadership bid.
utilizing her background to throw out their more extreme policy for votes
Trouble is, if he doesn't sack her, he might end up having to let her actually carry out one of her bonkers schemes.
Good question. I hadn't checked. No, they're headed in the other direction towards the US embassy this time. Nowhere near it.
Nope. And certainly not at 11am.
Yes, but I am sure that some of the people who will be on the march will have in the past, or will in the future, walk past the cenotaph. I am sure that some of the people on the march will once have owned, do own, or will own, paint in some form.
She's already carried out quite a few. Abject failures all. Look at the ridiculous barge business, just as one example.
It's a very serious, straight-faced point. srs bsnss :-|
I am sorry to say that only kind intelligent people understand my point.
