Lo Siento.
Second As Farce
Nobody invited you to give your opinion on shit. You decided to offer your "critique" on a thread dedicated to supporting and publicising strike activity. If I wanted to hear the Guardian's take on it, I'd go there.
Strike!
- Thread starter smokedout
- Start date
It's a discussion forum, the invitation is implied. Wouldn't really work otherwise would it!
Lo Siento.
Second As Farce
I say this through gritted teeth, because it should be obvious ... But can you not see why, given the amount of unfair shit that is routinely levelled at strikers by conservative and liberal press alike, it might be nice for this thread not to be like that?
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
some will, some won't. The court of public opinion isn't really what a strike action is about. It's nice if you are given solidarity but at heart the dispute is between the employees and the employer. If people have lost money they should recoup it from the people who began this dispute- the employer.
The thread wasn't like that after I posted either, until the usual suspects who believe they are avenging class warriors decided to resort to abuse and trolling. I made one comment that wasn't remotely anti-union (unless you're a fucking moron or a troll).
But again, completely ignore ALL THE PRO STRIKE POSTS IVE MADE BEFORE!
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
it's a discussion forum, and yet you object when people reply to you and point out that you are talking rubbish. Every time this happens, you throw a huff and tell everyone else that they're cunts (with wishes for cancer and suicide as well).
Perhaps you should just admit you are not cut out for partaking in actual discussions.
That's why i said rightly or wrongly in respect to losing money.
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Perhaps you should bully someone else you prick and not whine when someone gets a bloody nose for winding someone up.
And that statement is anti-union how? You don't even know what the phrase 'anti union' means do you?
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
I'm not 'bullying' you - to do that I'd need to do something like, oh I dont know, tell you to kill yourself, or wish cancer on you.
I'm arguing with you. And you are failing to argue back, you're just crying tat everyone disagrees with you. Tough shit.
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
Saying your union is shit and your leader a fraud is anti-union, yes. If you cant tell that, then there is no hope for you.
That you call it 'crying' proves the point. You're an idiot with a sad little agenda. You ignore waht suits your bullying agenda, just like the other cunts. You're just here deliberately trying to push my buttons because that's the desperate sad little prick you are, you sad old cunt.
Quote where I said those words.
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
I just did quote where you put forward that sentiment
You are an ignorant fool, incapable of making an argument, which is why you always immediately resort to abuse and calling people cunts, who should kill themselves, and cunts, and who should get cancer. And then cunts again, just for good measure.And then you have the cheek to attack other people for 'ad hominems.'
Good luck doling out those 'bloody noses'
here's another intellectual coward and hypocrit
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
the thing is we can't base strikes on 'what the press and public will think of it'. The press will demonise every strike, except occasionally FBU cos its hard to sell 'look at these bastards wanting a decent wage! for going and saving people from burning death!'
no matter how righteous your reasons for the workplace dispute, you will be crucified in the press. So why give a fuck what they say? If individual customers are out of pocket, tell them why.
A strike won't even garner the support of the 'labour' party. They like union money but they don't like backing union disputes.
so inevitably it comes down to defending the pay and conditions you signed up for in good faith.
I didn't ask you to do that. The cowardice on this forum is extraordinary: when confronted with your own bullshit you act out of hypocrisy. You accused me of saying something nasty through a straw man and when confronted on it you don't even have the stones to be honest about it. Just like the rest of the hypocrits and urban class warriors. If the people striking have you for support, then god help them.
chilango
Hypothetical Wanker
Oh go fuck yourself
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
They just did. That's why, as a part of what is likely to be extended industrial action, they have struck for 24 hours. And why they chose this ground at this time. That's the battle.
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
What was the straw man? You dont know what that means, do you? Its just a phrase you've picked up that you think makes you look clever. But it doesnt when you use it wrongly. And it's a bit rich you saying I 'accused you of saying something nasty' when you're the one who's just been calling for a poster to kill themself and calling every single other person a cunt etc etc
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
such as striking at a time that will have an impact. Except you dont actually support that, do you?
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Ah no, that would provoke reactions moaning about the impact.
I asked you to quote me saying what you accused me of saying.
You still haven't done that. Instead you accuse what I actually said of saying something it didn't.
You tell me, i'm sure you have evidence to support that.
And ill take no lectures in supporting actions from an intellectually dishonest liar and coward like you, you fucking old cunt.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Poll
