"It'll be my pension one day"
Is she planning on still living at home when he's retired??!!
He crossed a picket line he's a scab, end of story. He could have spoken at the rally in Edinburgh, he chose, along with all the other scab SNP MSP's to cross the picketline. Fuck him the fat jambo pie eating cunt.
He crossed a picket line to go into Holyrood, where he is the one that's in power.I think you're speaking crap tbh. He went to Westminster because that is where the centre of tory power is.
I think you're speaking crap tbh. He went to Westminster because that is where the centre of tory power is. As for the issue of him 'picking up his days pay'. He's getting paid anyway in his salary so it makes no difference. I don't know much about the SNP so I can only go on Salmonds' actions in this case, and I didn't see it being an issue. I'd rather he did what he did then making some empty political gesture for the cameras. We get too much of that as it is.
He crossed a picket line to go into Holyrood, where he is the one that's in power.
Fair enough. For some reason I had it in my head that I saw him on PMQ's earlier. Although I was playing Skyrim at the same time so you can understand my lack of proper attention. But the issue here is about whether or not Salmond was right to 'cross the picket line' - which For me misses the point about what a strike is for.
The withdrawal of labour should be to show that Capital (in this case the state) is completely reliant on those who create the wealth. Workers. In this context, a scab is someone who is complicit in maintaining the power of Capital over Labour by aiding the continuation of production during that period of strike. Alex Salmond is not a worker though, he is an elected representative, and as such, his presence in parliament makes no difference to the ability of strikers to affect the change they want. It does not in any way hinder their aims.
I should face palm your attempts at being the hardman striker on the picket-line. Be pragmatic instead of posturing. His 'crossing the picket-line' was no such thing. It's all just 'impressions' that you want him to give. Why? It means fuck all in reality.
What are you going on about?
You either cross a picket line, or you don't!
He was, however, creating work that a scab did instead of striking workers. He was undermining the strike he claimed to support.The point is. He wasn't replacing a striking worker.
No. The point is: he's a scab.The point is. He wasn't replacing a striking worker.
And you don't. Ever.You either cross a picket line, or you don't!
I should face palm your attempts at being the hardman striker on the picket-line. Be pragmatic instead of posturing. His 'crossing the picket-line' was no such thing. It's all just 'impressions' that you want him to give. Why? It means fuck all in reality.
And the point of a strike is...to shut down a workplace. By crossing the line - even tho he wasn't himself one of the workers in dispute - he was still going against the demands of the strike. Even if he did then speak up for those demands.The point is. He wasn't replacing a striking worker.
And you don't. Ever.
Ask yourself why it is that crossing a picket-line is looked down on. It's because of the effect this might have on the ability of the strike to succeed. Alex Salmond does not have that effect when he enters parliament. Especially considering he voiced his support.
He'd have been more convincing had he done that at the rally in Edinburgh, and refused to cross the picket line.he voiced his support.
Ask yourself why it is that crossing a picket-line is looked down on. It's because of the effect this might have on the ability of the strike to succeed. Alex Salmond does not have that effect when he enters parliament. Especially considering he voiced his support.
And the point of a strike is...to shut down a workplace.
What's this hardman striker straw man you spluttered onto the screen?
Exactly. And him going to work did not prevent that happening.
It just appears to me that you are attempting to fulfil a stereo type of a militant from the 70's and apply that to a situation which is completely different. It's all just rhetoric and hot wind. Why give a fuck what Salmond does when it impacts not iota on whether the strike succeeds.
It just appears to me that you are attempting to fulfil a stereo type of a militant from the 70's and apply that to a situation which is completely different. It's all just rhetoric and hot wind. Why give a fuck what Salmond does when it impacts not iota on whether the strike succeeds.
He's still a scab.
Exactly. And him going to work did not prevent that happening.
he helped the workplace stay open. So he did prevent them shutting it down.Exactly. And him going to work did not prevent that happening.
This makes no sense to me.