Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

stop MP's moonlighting

To twist it slightly, what percentage of an MPs working life should be devoted to being an MP and what percentage should they be allowed to devote to a second job?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ax^
To twist it slightly, what percentage of an MPs working life should be devoted to being an MP and what percentage should they be allowed to devote to a second job?
They should be allowed to literally moonlight - to do a second job at night. But they must be on the benches for the start of morning business and woe betide the parliamentarian who danders in late
 
I understand why the early Labour movement argued for the role of MP to receive a salary so that working class representatives could put themselves forward for candidature, but I'm at a loss to get why that remuneration has to be nearly 3X the mean wage. Far from arguing that MPs will be less corrupt if only we paid them more, I'd argue for a £30k salary, close to the mean, and if that puts off psychopathic cunts who are on the make...so much the better.
 
I understand why the early Labour movement argued for the role of MP to receive a salary so that working class representatives could put themselves forward for candidature, but I'm at a loss to get why that remuneration has to be nearly 3X the mean wage. Far from arguing that MPs will be less corrupt if only we paid them more, I'd argue for a £30k salary, close to the mean, and if that puts off psychopathic cunts who are on the make...so much the better.
If they want an £80k salary then they should put in the hours. Which ought to mean about four weeks leave. None of this several months off in the summer. It's a kick in the teeth for taxpayers when the people who polish the green benches have huge pensions and at least four months off each year.
 
If they want an £80k salary then they should put in the hours. Which ought to mean about four weeks leave. None of this several months off in the summer. It's a kick in the teeth for taxpayers when the people who polish the green benches have huge pensions and at least four months off each year.

I’d go with paying them national median wage. Call it “performance-related pay”.
 
Are you counting being a Minister as a second job?
Not sure why you laughed? Thrust of your and others arguement seems to be how very dare MP's not spend every minute working for their constituents. Half of them are there, because they either want to or are climbing the greasy pole of government. Which is a seperate job ,one that will eat into their time though quite well renumerated.
 
As if he is not busy enough being prime minister, he has had Brexit to deal with and to top that covid. So what does he do, he trys to write a book about Shakespeare!
tbf Looks like he took the half million before being on front benches and somebody wants his homework. Intresting the Yanks think he's got space in his diary for a book launch next March
 
As if he is not busy enough being prime minister, he has had Brexit to deal with and to top that covid. So what does he do, he trys to write a book about Shakespeare!
Indeed, and err he er needs to er learn er to speak err English er though er first before he er starts er to er think that er he er can er understand er Shakespeare first.
 
As if he is not busy enough being prime minister, he has had Brexit to deal with and to top that covid. So what does he do, he trys to write a book about Shakespeare!
Let's not forget the holidays, the affairs, the fathering of more children......
 
As in many industries, it would seem the ultimate solution would be to replace the role of MPs with a few simple AI algorithms, enabling former MPs to carry on with the more important business of stealing taxpayer money unbridled by the need to shout HYARHAYRHYAR in parliament once or twice a year.
 
I understand why the early Labour movement argued for the role of MP to receive a salary so that working class representatives could put themselves forward for candidature, but I'm at a loss to get why that remuneration has to be nearly 3X the mean wage. Far from arguing that MPs will be less corrupt if only we paid them more, I'd argue for a £30k salary, close to the mean, and if that puts off psychopathic cunts who are on the make...so much the better.
Yep. MPs are (part of) the enemy. Once you accept that, it's easier to go with the idea they should be a cheaper enemy.

The role MPs play as legislators means they are uniquely in a position where they shouldn't be doing paid work for anyone at all. If they really must have 2nd jobs, put the same rules (and limits) in place as there are for working whilst on Universal Credit.
 
Yep. MPs are (part of) the enemy. Once you accept that, it's easier to go with the idea they should be a cheaper enemy.

The role MPs play as legislators means they are uniquely in a position where they shouldn't be doing paid work for anyone at all. If they really must have 2nd jobs, put the same rules (and limits) in place as there are for working whilst on Universal Credit.
Everyone knows the boost their morale can receive when senior managers do real work - for example seeing the director of library services shelving books or doing a shift on the information point. And at a time when vital national services are under threat of being overwhelmed it is heartening that so many mps demand the right to do second jobs. Let them help out as ancillary staff in the NHS perhaps on the late night graveyard shift.
 
If they want an £80k salary then they should put in the hours. Which ought to mean about four weeks leave. None of this several months off in the summer. It's a kick in the teeth for taxpayers when the people who polish the green benches have huge pensions and at least four months off each year.
They often say they also do constituency work when parliament is closed but there seem to be no checks and balances on the constituency work
 
Back
Top Bottom