8ball
Maximum Facepalm
I like a bit of and then I got off the bus.
Was this before or after you accidentally the whole bottle?
I like a bit of and then I got off the bus.
Yeah, that seemed really contrived.shite look at audience/camera device.
Thanks for the article!"My DVD got reviewed in Nuts and Zoo magazine, but I refused to do any interviews with them, because you don’t really want those sorts of people coming to see you. I might have done ten years ago, before I was bitter, but now I just think it’ll make for a miserable night. A room of thick people, you couldn’t use irony, I’m too old to struggle.”
linky
“I have a much more straight-forward relationship with my editor at the Sunday Times culture section than I’ve ever had with anyone at the BBC, who are the most duplicitous, lying, dishonest people.
I feel much happier, much more ethically comfortable writing for a Murdoch newspaper than I would doing anything for BBC2, which to me is just so mad and chaotic and dishonest and panicky.
I’ve wasted so much of my time there. There are things I wouldn’t do, I wouldn’t write for the BNP paper, but no-ones ever censored anything I’ve done for The Sunday Times on the grounds of politics or taste. Whereas you run into that sort of thing all the time in the BBC."
Loved him kicking off at the audience, the silence and embarrassment, the 4 people clapping, and David Baddiel's panic! Brilliant.He's generally quite subdued on panel shows. His soft, slow delivery of material isn't exactly tailored to the "zinger" based fast pace of those sort of programs. The absolute classic from him was his appearance on the Radio 4 show "Hearsay". He basically slagged off the entire audience and most of the panel:
The Delboy stuff bored me, but it was better crafted than last week. I gave the sketches two weeks and I now agree with PieEye; the sketches fuck with the pacing of the showing for no discernible benefit.i thought it was very funny - much better than last week's. i like the fact that he doesn't cram too much into each half hour.
If you don't watch a Stewart Lee set to the very, very end then you will miss the entire point of the whole thing. He isn't a gagmeister, he's an artist. And he crafts his point in such a way to create his intended perception shift right at the end. He's a bone fide comic genius, with no modern equivalent.tepid.
one good line - 'foreign insects'.
shite look at audience/camera device.
lame subject matter.
used to love mr lee. couldn't be arsed to watch to the end.
gx
His stand up is pure 100% perfection. But you have to realise that for most of it, he is trying to make you uncomfortable rather than amused. He's knocking down the comfortable internal walls so that he can create the denouement at the right time and in the right way.Generally the stand up segment wasn't as funny. Some of the targets are a little obvious and his points a little weak and he does suffer in comparison with Charlie Brooker when tackling popular culture. I wish he'd move onto something else really. But I enjoyed the general bloodymindedness of it. I didn't laugh much but it was enjoyable enough.
The sort of people who vote for Delboy falling through the bar?
Stewart Lee really misses Richard Herring. When he was lying on the floor shouting about Delboy, he was practically impersonating Rich. He writes routines for a double act but performs them solo.
I saw them together a few years ago at a one-off comedy thingy called Tedstock. They did a pisstake of the "I'm a mac, I'm a PC" adverts. It was utterly brilliant.I'd love to see them properly back together again.
'It should have been us, Stew!'They did a pisstake of the "I'm a mac, I'm a PC" adverts. It was utterly brilliant.
I saw them together a few years ago at a one-off comedy thingy called Tedstock. They did a pisstake of the "I'm a mac, I'm a PC" adverts. It was utterly brilliant.
I still prefer Stewart Lee as a dedicated stand-up though. Saying that, a half hour doesn't necessarily suit him best -- watching him craft more like an hour's material and seeing him synthesise all the threads perfectly for the point at the end is pure joy. "90s comedian" was just brilliant and a lesson to all comics about how to create the art of comedy.
His stand up is pure 100% perfection. But you have to realise that for most of it, he is trying to make you uncomfortable rather than amused. He's knocking down the comfortable internal walls so that he can create the denouement at the right time and in the right way.
Anybody that watches Stewart Lee and expects a load of jokes in the manner of other comedians is really in for a bad time.
Stewart Lee really misses Richard Herring. When he was lying on the floor shouting about Delboy, he was practically impersonating Rich. He writes routines for a double act but performs them solo.
The last time Richard Herring played Offline he went to a very dark place for a while. It wasn't funny at all but I thought it was genius.The thing is, in the context of that episode, Delboy falling over was a perfectly funny thing to happen. And David Jason's performance made it funny. Snipped out of context for a clip show, I can imagine people being bemused that it was so popular.
Stewart Lee really misses Richard Herring. When he was lying on the floor shouting about Delboy, he was practically impersonating Rich. He writes routines for a double act but performs them solo.
I like Stu, I want him to succeed, I'm willing to love it, but I don't.
Please.
Mildly amusing when he does it in a stand-up scenario. Not at all amusing when repeated for the 2nd time on a message board.
Thanks. x