Is his really your last get out - that i said/typed vocal?
¿Que?
Is his really your last get out - that i said/typed vocal?
prolly right, but he'd be lucky
It staggers me that people are criticising Spain's passing style.
It's immaculate.
You might be able to make a case that they aren't direct enough in their movement but even then you're on pretty weak ground.
Lo Siento comes across as if he deeply resents the Spanish. Which is ironic considering that he lives there.
So you're pleased that Spain's tactics managed to turn what could have been an exciting, counter attacking battle royale on the pitch into what some might describe as a dull, thrill-untroubled, goal-rare pass-a-thon?They were completely snuffed out as an attacking force by Spain – one chance in the whole game! They came up short.
So you're pleased that Spain's tactics managed to turn what could have been an exciting, counter attacking battle royale on the pitch into what some might describe as a dull, thrill-untroubled, goal-rare pass-a-thon?
Do you ever go to live games? If you're in the crowd you want excitement, goals and thrills, not chess-like masterclasses in territorial possession and tactics designed to frustrate the opposition into fouling the other team.I know what you're saying. Pleased is the wrong word, but I admire the ability to do it. In an opposite, but similar way, I admired and enjoyed watching Greece soaking up the pressure in Euro 04 and winning with one breakaway goal. Maybe that makes me weird.
Like any country there are thinks I like about it, and things that I don't.
Look, not giving the ball away much doesn't make a team a good passing side. It certainly doesn't make them "immaculate". I think you'd be hard pressed to name more than 2 or 3 extended passages of play in which Spain have played well in this tournament. Portugal second half maybe? They did a good job against a dangerous Germany team. Otherwise?
If a team gives the ball away a lot does that make them a bad passing side?
I get the feeling this thread is proving just why British teams don't fare well internationally.
Depends how they're playing. Germany and Brazil both the ball away shitloads earlier in the tournament. I wouldn't say either set of players were bad passers of the ball, just playing to different instructions.
Would you agree with this:
The individual players of England are good passers. The English team can't pass to save its life.
I don't think passing was the problem with this England team, no.
Ok. Do you agree with this principle:
If the other team doesn't have the ball, they can't score.
Sorry, I wasn't clear in the first post you quoted but didn't have time to clarify. Of course it's not that clear-cut, but it does seem there's a difference of priorities in terms of goals and 'intellectual' football (I dislike that term but I wanna go home!).cause that's the only possible argument that could be going on here right? Ignorant hoofballists versus continental purists.
Sorry, I wasn't clear in the first post you quoted but didn't have time to clarify. Of course it's not that clear-cut, but it does seem there's a difference of priorities in terms of goals and 'intellectual' football (I dislike that term but I wanna go home!).
Some are arguing that there has to be an end product, whereas some are quite happy to watch a team pass and pass and pass and pass.
And I'm pretty much stating the obvioius
Depends how literally you intend it. If you mean it 100% literally, then it's a ridiculously stupid question. I'm sure you've got some devastating conclusion to this round of rhetorical questioning, so get on with it, eh?
Of course there has to be an end product, otherwise watching the players warm up would be entertaining.
Oh, I dunno. Xavi, Iniesta, Busquets, Fabregas...
Looks good to me.
Brilliant. Spain is now to be blamed for being hacked to pieces. I think an apology is due to all the Duth players who were forced to stamp their studs on sheens and chests alike for any stress the forced fouling might have caused them.Do you ever go to live games? If you're in the crowd you want excitement, goals and thrills, not chess-like masterclasses in territorial possession and tactics designed to frustrate the opposition into fouling the other team.
That's semantic though. All you've established is that Spain are good at passing, to the extent that they can complete lots of short sideways passes in non-dangerous areas. It's a meaningless definition of the term.No need to get shirty.
The point is that a completed pass is pretty good evidence of a good passing side. Now, it may not mean that they are an incisive passing side or a dynamic passing side but you can't even graduate to that level without establishing the fundamental passing basis.
Basically my point is this - trying to argue that Spain are not a good passing side is a bit like arguing that Emile Heskey is a natural goalscorer.
It defies all logic and flies in the face of reason.
Brilliant. Spain is now to be blamed for being hacked to pieces. I think an apology is due to all the Duth players who were forced to stamp their studs on sheens and chests alike for any stress the forced fouling might have caused them.
Funny how none of the other teams Spain has played felt provoked to try to kick them off the park.
I'd say no side with De Jong and Van Bommel in it are ever gonna be subtleI do think the Dutch lost it a bit.