Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Smiley culture update

I just came in to post that. Its amazing that the IPCC doesnt have the powers to interview the officers present at such a death, the police can simply refuse unless made a suspect. To refuse suggests some sort of guilt or a complete disregard for the deceaseds family imo.
it's not amazing at all. it's only to be expected and shows why the ipcc is a worthy successor to the pca.
 
I didn't realise that apparently he'd stabbed himself and *then* been put in handcuffs - I read that in the Guardian yesterday. That looks odd.
 
if i was a copper and someone had just stabbed themselves in the heart and was collapsed on the floor, bleeding profusely, i would definitely think 'i know, i'll handcuff this person, that will help'

then refuse to speak to the iPCC about it

fucking stinks.
 
I didn't realise that apparently he'd stabbed himself and *then* been put in handcuffs - I read that in the Guardian yesterday. That looks odd.
hadnt heard that before - thats prize bullshit.

From Fozzies link:
The Coroner has already stated the inquest in to Mr Emmanuel's death will be held with a jury
~
Hopefully a jury will be able to be critical on this... though sometimes jurys aren't given a remit to ask the key question, such as was he handcuffed and then stabbed. Anyone know what happens next?
 
Unfuckingreal that about the coppers being 'witnesses' and not one of them a possible suspect, when you have all of those unanswered questions.
 
I suspect after the Tomlinson case we will see more and more deaths in police custody having a jury at the coroners. It just underlines how little faith there is (even within the justice system) in the Police investigating itself or the 'independence' of the IPCC.
 

Thanks Fozzie - this made me go "WTF!" several times:

Consideration was also given to whether the actions of individual officers met the threshold for misconduct under the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2008. The investigation has found there were no individual failings which, for the purposes of the Regulations, amounted to misconduct.
 
I'm sure it's standard procedure to cuff anyone immediately when raided, let alone let them go make tea unaccompanied. When I got raided, the second they were through the door they immediately cuffed me and sat me down with a copper watching my every move.

The whole thing stinks. Fuck the lot of 'em. Cunts.

:mad::mad::mad:
 
I'm sure it's standard procedure to cuff anyone immediately when raided, let alone let them go make tea unaccompanied. When I got raided, the second they were through the door they immediately cuffed me and sat me down with a copper watching my every move.

The whole thing stinks. Fuck the lot of 'em. Cunts.

:mad::mad::mad:
blatantly
 
i bet we'll discover that no-one was to blame and that nothing could have prevented this happening.

I'm sure you're right and the OB's version of events will be believed...but really?
Surrey Coroner Richard Travers told an inquest jury: "You will hear from Witness 2 that, when they were coming to the end of the search... Mr Emmanuel very suddenly and without warning stood up and Witness 2 realised for the first time that he, Mr Emmanuel, had a large kitchen knife in his hand.
"The officer says that he shouted out 'knife' so as to warn his colleagues, at which point, Mr Emmanuel, he says, held out his arm and screamed at Witness 2 'Do you f****** want some of this?' Or 'What about this?'
"Witness 2 will tell you that Mr Emmanuel's face and body language had completely changed, he became angry and was screaming.
"He will tell you that he, Mr Emmanuel, then held the knife with both hands and plunged it into his own chest."
:hmm:
 
Back
Top Bottom