beesonthewhatnow
going deaf for a living
You’re a massive twat then.Speaking as someone that has had my first two jabs, if vaccines were made mandatory then I would see it as my moral obligation to refuse any boosters.
You’re a massive twat then.Speaking as someone that has had my first two jabs, if vaccines were made mandatory then I would see it as my moral obligation to refuse any boosters.
Speaking as someone that has had my first two jabs, if vaccines were made mandatory then I would see it as my moral obligation to refuse any boosters.
No idea who that is aimed at, but I think refusing to follow a public health measure that's there for the good of everyone because it's been mandated is quite different to withholding some part of your tax due to not agreeing with a particular aspect of what the tax pays for.
Vaccination is not going to be mandated here anyway, so it's all meaningless grandstanding anyway.
Yep, that’s exactly the same.Were council tax refuseniks twats for failing to hand over money to support local services?
Why? what's your rationale for doing so? I'm curious not critical.Speaking as someone that has had my first two jabs, if vaccines were made mandatory then I would see it as my moral obligation to refuse any boosters.
Speaking as someone that has had my first two jabs, if vaccines were made mandatory then I would see it as my moral obligation to refuse any boosters.
I'm hard against starting a list with letters and then switching to numbers! But yeah, I agree that the specifics are vital, and I'd break it down further, to at the very least:I'd also have to say I don't understand this position. From previous posts you say you think vaccines are a good thing that you've taken willingly, so I don't see what the logic is in refusing to take a booster shot. You're still well within your rights (and logic too IMHO) to take it and still have an honest stance against mandatory vaccines.
I had a wee bunfight over this topic with some friends over the weekend and it seems much of the bone of contention was due to the way that some people were interpreting "mandatory". We basically boiled it down in to two categories:
a) people who are eligible and no contraindicated but who choose not to take the vaccine are fined (or similar minor punishments)
2) people who are eligible and no contraindicated but who choose not to take the vaccine are dragged kicking and screaming in to a centre and get prodded in the arm with a rusty breadknife
Personally I'm hard against 2) but only soft against a). I'd be interested to know if anyone else makes a differentiation for or against based on that categorisation.
As driving on the left is mandatory, are you morally obligated to drive on the right?Speaking as someone that has had my first two jabs, if vaccines were made mandatory then I would see it as my moral obligation to refuse any boosters.
I'm hard against starting a list with letters and then switching to numbers! But yeah, I agree that the specifics are vital, and I'd break it down further, to at the very least:
a) no entry to sports/music/cinemas/similar voluntary leisure events without the vaccine
ii) no work without the vaccine (or ii.a, no work in specific fields without the vaccine)
γ) fines
4) rusty breadknife.
Like, I think I support a) but am against the others. And then you have the distinction between "vaccine or fuck off" and "vaccine or negative test or fuck off" as well.
You are in France. The fascist bastards.As driving on the left is mandatory, are you morally obligated to drive on the right?
Any unvaccinated person (without medical exemption) should have to do the limbo succesfully before admittance to indoors/public transport/etcI'd just make life difficult for people without a vaccine, no need to make it mandatory
Speaking as someone that has had my first two jabs, if vaccines were made mandatory then I would see it as my moral obligation to refuse any boosters.
Thinking about it, already went over some of this on the vaccine passports thread, but the devil really is in the detail here, cos there's a whole host of questions that, even if they don't change your answer to "is it a good idea or not?" should at least affect how much of a good or a bad idea you think it is - so a big one is how do you prove you've had the vaccine, is it wholly through a smartphone app, and so fucks over anyone who doesn't have a smartphone, or doesn't feel like entrusting their data to whichever tory donor got the contract to run the app, or are there alternatives? Similarly, there's questions to be asked around immigration status - there's a lot of border infrastructure built into the NHS now, checking it does seem like individuals who don't have an NHS number and aren't registered with a GP can get the vaccine, which is good, but can they satisfactorily demonstrate that they've had the vaccine for the purposes of whatever vaccine mandate? I'm not really sure about that.
And then again there's the question of people who've had the vaccine in other countries, I'm sure I've seen accounts from people who've been tripped up because they've had the vaccine elsewhere and then their medical records don't copy over/aren't accepted by the NHS/they've had a vaccine that isn't approved for use here. I don't know how you'd solve this problem while also screening out genuinely non-vaxxed people trying to pull a fast one, but then I'm not arguing in favour of vaccine mandates so it's not really my problem to solve. I think anyone who is strongly in favour should probably have an explanation for it though.
The big elephant is to what degree - and it's a political judgement call - a de facto compulsory vaccination program would have on the take up of other vaccines, and to what extent it might cause disengagement with wider health programmes like maternity, child development etc... I don't know the answer to that: my suspicion is that it might see a greater, long term negative impact on health than the positive impact of higher vaccination rates for covid, but I'm happy to be persuaded otherwise.
Easy to say that if you're confident you won't be part of the collateral damage! Also, I feel like your last paragraph there is a bit of a contradiction to the first half of your post.Personally, I have little concern for 'collateral damage' - if there are easy, technical/administrative solutions to issues then I'm happy for them to be explored and facilitated, but I'm making a big omelette, and egg shells are a matter that simply doesn't register on my give-a-fuck-ometer.
If you have a runaway train, you don't ignore ways of stopping it that risk scratching the trains paintwork.
The big elephant is to what degree - and it's a political judgement call - a de facto compulsory vaccination program would have on the take up of other vaccines, and to what extent it might cause disengagement with wider health programmes like maternity, child development etc... I don't know the answer to that: my suspicion is that it might see a greater, long term negative impact on health than the positive impact of higher vaccination rates for covid, but I'm happy to be persuaded otherwise.
Easy to say that if you're confident you won't be part of the collateral damage! Also, I feel like your last paragraph there is a bit of a contradiction to the first half of your post.
See, I have a level of sympathy for that, but I would say that the hostile environment and the concentration of power in the hands of unaccountable tech companies are already big, long term issues baked into society, and I think like the points I mentioned are linked in with those?Not really - I'm not greatly fussed about short term issues or inconveniences, so I'm happy to brush them off. big, long term ones that might get baked into society however are a different matter.
Yes agreed, and I think it's not just health outcomes tbh. There's definite scope for some sort of hard right QAnon type thing to come through here IMO and mandatory vaccination could easily give it a big push. Although equally I don't think pandering to them is necessarily going to help either.
I think tbh they need to be dealt with much more forcefully on a number of fronts. Could probably go in a few threads, but there's a good little article here on countering anti-vaccine stuff more aggressively COVID vaccines: time to confront anti-vax aggression
And if it was dealt with better and more pro-actively then vaccine mandates and passes might be unnecessary.
i'd force them to tak 6 ees and then on teh come down get them to do the hard level of suduko before entrance to all sporting events etc.Any unvaccinated person (without medical exemption) should have to do the limbo succesfully before admittance to indoors/public transport/etc
Not sure yet how low the bar should be placed though
why don't we just build some extra hospitals so those who don't want the vacinne can fill them up by dying, and the rest of us get on with our lives?
Covid-19: Hospital ITU at capacity with mainly unvaccinated patients
Doctors are pleading for people in Gloucestershire to have the jab to help alleviate the pressure.www.bbc.co.uk
What happened to those big facilities we mothballed?
Do you reckon there's a kind of vicious circle effect where people have to over-sell vaccines to an extent to try and counteract the damage that's done by anti-vax stuff, and the over-selling then leads to holes that anti-vaxxers can exploit? Over the last week or so, various of my housemates have come out with stuff along the lines of "they said that having the vaccine would mean I/you could do [xyz] and now we can't, so I can't see what the point is". I have tried being firm on the line that vaccination leading to reduced transmission and hospitalisation is worth it, even if it doesn't allow you to do international travel during a pandemic without having a test or whatever, but do reckon some of the way the vaccine was sold was unhelpful on this score.
Although I am also open to the argument that that's nothing to do with the anti-vaxxers and all just cos of neoliberalism or whatever.