Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ship porn

If I were a betting man and human error was the cause, I’d be waging on the pilots fucking off for an extended fag and leaving the bridge unattended.
The pilot is there to advise the captain, they are not in charge. Captain, watch-keeping officers and pilots will all have spent a lot of time on simulators. The nautical college in Alexandria is a very impressive facility (they even invited me to lecture there once).
Typically you would have captain, watch keeping officer and at least one helmsman on the bridge, plus one of the pilots, while the other rests.

It could have been a whole lot worse....at least there wasn't a pile-up this time:

Details have emerged about a multi-ship collision that took place in the Suez Canal on Sunday that lead to its temporary closure.
The vessels involved are owned by leading shipowners including NYK Line, Wisdom Marine Lines, AM Nomikos Transworld, HMM and Cyprus Sea Lines.
According to well-placed shipping sources, trouble began on Sunday evening when 5,100-teu containership Aeneas (built 2010), commercially managed by HMM, came to a halt in the southern section of the canal.
There are conflicting reports as to whether the ship ran aground or was experiencing a problem with its engines.
The vessel was 20th in a southbound convoy of 27 ships.

Three bulk carriers following behind, Cyprus Sea Lines’ 74,200-dwt Panamax Alexander (built 2001), Wisdom Marine Lines 81,700-dwt Sakizaya Kalon (built 2017) and AM Nomikos Transworld’s Osios David (built 2012) were unable to stop behind the Aeneas and as a result collided with each other.

from here
 
Just read this interesting article on how the direction and handling of a ship in a restricted waterway can be affected by what is called The Bank and Squat Effect. It would only take a lapse in concentration or inexperience to cause a major grounding or collision with the bank.
 
This is why I love Urban. However esoteric the subject there is always someone who actually knows about it!
If they unload a load of containers to lighten the ship and free it, won't there be a equal time delay whilst they load them all on again? Or are they just planning on dumping them in the desert and letting the owners claim on their insurance.
 
Google tells me about 50 ships use the Suez canal every day, so there are going to be queues backing up by now and I guess people will be weighing up going around.

They've already started. And the very first ship to do so was the Ever Greet, the sister ship of the grounded one.

And there's probably a million jokes in that which you can all make up for yourselves.
 
I've let you down, let myself down, let the whole school down.
Has anyone submitted "put teuchter in charge, that'll sort it" to the Guardian thing yet?
Is it called the Evergreen or the Evergiven? Reports aren’t consistent
The company is the Evergreen, the ship is the Evergreen's Monster.

Anyway, mostly coming here to post this - a challenger appears:
 
Typically via Suez to Amsterdam at the average container ship speed of twelve knots takes thirteen days. Via Cape of Good Hope takes forty-two days.
Fuel costs are astronomical too.
 
Last edited:
Just read this interesting article on how the direction and handling of a ship in a restricted waterway can be affected by what is called The Bank and Squat Effect. It would only take a lapse in concentration or inexperience to cause a major grounding or collision with the bank.
Interesting. I am now wondering if it’s been down to incredible luck that no ship had suffered a similar accident in half a century, or if ships losing control and hitting one of the banks is a relatively common occurrence but this is the first time one has managed to completely block passage.
 
Typically via Suez to Amsterdam at the average container ship speed of twelve knots takes thirteen days. Via Cape Horn takes forty-two days.
Fuel costs are astronomical too.
And is it possible that the Cape Horn option isn't so wise in winter months, don't they have huge storms?
 
Quite an interesting read on Vesselfinder about why the pandemic has led to a surge in exports as countries industries come out of lockdown, a worldwide container shortage and rising shipping costs.

Freight costs soaring
More than 80% of global trade by volume is moved by sea, and the disruptions are adding billions of dollars to supply chain costs. Globally, the average cost to ship a 40-foot container shot up from $1,040 last June to $4,570 on March 1, according to S&P Global Platts.

Those costs add up. In February, container shipping costs for seaborne US goods imports totaled $5.2 billion, compared to $2 billion during the same month in 2020, according to S&P Global Panjiva.

These expenses could soon mean higher prices for consumers, adding upward pressure to rising inflation — a nightmare scenario for Wall Street, which is already fearful that a spike in prices could force the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates sooner than expected.

"At the moment a lot of these costs are within the supply chains," said Chris Rogers, a research analyst at S&P Global Panjiva. "I think it's inevitable that it will be passed on to consumers — it's just going to take time," he added.
The coronavirus wreaked havoc on global supply chains last year, as lockdowns temporarily closed factories and disrupted the normal flow of trade. Economic activity slowed dramatically at the start of the pandemic, and the rapid rebound in trade volumes that followed caught companies off guard.

A pickup in manufacturing and seemingly insatiable demand from housebound consumers for goods such as televisions, furniture and exercise bikes has stretched suppliers and made it difficult for consumers to find the products they'd like to buy.

Manufacturers have also struggled to secure crucial components. Major carmakers, including Ford (F) and Volkswagen (VLKAF), have been forced to idle factories because of a shortage of computer chips caused by high demand for smartphones, gaming systems and other tech gadgets.

"One year ago, global trade slowed to a crawl as the Covid-19 pandemic first hit China and then spread worldwide," Gene Seroka, executive director at the Port of Los Angeles, said in a presentation this month. "Today, we are in the seventh month of a historic import surge, driven by unprecedented demand by American consumers," he added.
US seaborne imports were nearly 30% higher in February than the same month last year and 20% up on February 2019, according to S&P Global Panjiva.

The import surge in the United States and elsewhere has led to a worldwide container shortage. Everything from cars and machinery to apparel and other consumer staples are shipped in these metal boxes. The factories that make them are mostly in China and many of them closed early in the pandemic, slowing down the rate at which new capacity was coming on stream, according to Rogers.


China's exports recovered fairly quickly compared to the rest of the world. At the same time, major shipping lines had canceled dozens of sailings to respond to the earlier lull in trade. The result was that empty containers piled up in all the wrong places and couldn't meet the sudden demand in Europe and North America for Asia-made goods.

Hapag-Lloyd (HPGLY), one of the world's largest container shipping lines, has deployed about 52 additional vessels just to move hundreds of thousands of empty containers to where they're needed most. In more normal times, there would be fewer than 10.

"That's in reality about a ship a week that's doing nothing more than moving empty containers," CEO Rolf Habben Jansen told investors on a call last week.
The influx of imports has compounded problems at choked up ports, which are contending with labor shortages due to Covid-19 and a slowdown in operations caused by social distancing measures and quarantines.

On Wednesday, there were two dozen vessels at anchor awaiting entry into either the Port of Los Angeles or the neighboring Port of Long Beach, according to Port of Los Angeles spokesperson, Phillip Sanfield.

"At the Port of Los Angeles, we are actively working on an additional 17 container ships," Sanfield told CNN Business. "Pre-pandemic, we would be working about 10 container ships with no container ships waiting to enter."
The port processed the equivalent of nearly 800,000 20-foot containers last month — the busiest February in its 114-year history.

Higher prices on the way
Companies have so far said very little about how they plan to respond to soaring freight rates but there are early signs that import prices are rising. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, US import prices experienced their largest monthly increase in January since March 2012.

"We anticipate strong demand from consumers to continue over the next couple of months and don't see meaningful change in capacity over that short time period," said Biesterfeld.
The cost to move goods by air, ocean, truck and train is now "structurally up" on 2019 and contracts reflect that, he added. "I do think the costs are real and eventually will manifest themselves for consumers," he said.
The extent to which this feeds through to consumer prices will vary from one product to the next. Goods that rely more heavily on imported components will likely cost more. At the same time, if the cost of imported goods rises significantly or these products become less readily available, that could give domestic producers more leeway to increase prices, said Joanna Konings, a senior economist at ING.

Commerzbank analysts said in a note to clients on Friday that the Suez snarl up could cause oil to become more expensive for consumers because of higher tanker rates as a result of the incident.

For Aston Chemicals, the cost increases were so severe that the only option was to pass them on to their customers: businesses that make everyday products such as shampoos, moisturizers and cosmetics.

If those companies in turn decide to hike prices for their customers, in this case retailers, consumers could start to feel the pinch soon, said Konings.

Source: CNN
 
I have just spent some interesting minutes perusing maps and reminding myself where things like the Panama canal are. In browsing around the globe some things become obvious, like the Falkland Islands, of course they are British! What else could they be? :( :)
 
I have just spent some interesting minutes perusing maps and reminding myself where things like the Panama canal are. In browsing around the globe some things become obvious, like the Falkland Islands, of course they are British! What else could they be? :( :)
It took me an embarrassingly long time to remember that the Panama canal and the Suez canal are actually two different places nowadays. :oops:
 
Has anyone submitted "put teuchter in charge, that'll sort it" to the Guardian thing yet?

The company is the Evergreen, the ship is the Evergreen's Monster.

Anyway, mostly coming here to post this - a challenger appears:

BBC R4 news, apparently the USA has offered Egypt assistance.

I’m sure the Egyptians would rather us, the French and the Israelis turned up again . We wouldn’t make drama out of a crisis.

Something something another Eden...
 
Yup that's how Columbus discovered America he was looking for another route but someone had dumped a continent in the way, he originally thought he had reached India from the other side which is why the original inhabitants were called Red Indians
 
Back
Top Bottom