Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Scots indy results thread

I am always suspect of any party that has "Nationalist" in its title.

He sounds like a fish anyhow. ;)
 
I don't think so. We're less than 9 months off an election, and there's now a head of steam building as all sorts of people spot the possibility for constitutional realignment. Cameron has promised change since the result, all the party leaders promised something before it.

We'll see but it looks to me like 9 months of constitutional arguments. What will come of that will depend on balance of forces, of course.
I'm sure something will come out of this constitutionally, but it's hard to say what till the dust settles. However now the vote has been won Cameron has no great incentive to please Scottish voters, particularly as he has only 1 MP in Scotland (and not many MSPs to lose in 2016). It's a mess really, Miliband might end up being the one putting all this into practice, but has his ultimate battle with the SNP to factor in. Cameron ain't got fuck all in Scotland but has to worry about his backbenchers and, most of all, what Farage will do with any promises he makes.
 
But honourable.
Nothing honourable about stepping down now. He can step down if he wants, but the next year is really important for the SNP. Potentially it is the period in which the powers of a Scottish parliament are set for the next generation.

Or not - they might get nothing substantial. But either way, he won't be there fighting for it. It's almost as if he doesn't give a shit really, he's just in it for himself...
 
Those who quaked at the polling booth and erred for the known instead of a chance to see what could have been possible, good or bad, will lay in their beds tonight and wonder if they have let slip a new beginning.

Drunk, or just relieved? ;)

I doubt the late No voting ex-switherers will be that bothered right now, tbh.
 
Cameron ain't got fuck all in Scotland

That's not actually quite correct. While the Tories only won one seat in 2010, their share of the vote at 16.7% was only 2.2% behind that of the second-placed Lib Dems and 3.2% behind the third-placed SNP. Their lack of MPs is an artefact of the FPTP system we have. As with the Tories in the 1980s, Labour benefitted a lot from the opposition splitting the vote. If you look at the electoral results, the Tories came second or a close third in a lot of places.
 
Of course it is. As the leader, he's taking full responsibility, as is fit and proper.

He's also clearing the way for his replacement before the General Election next year, of course.
Balls. He's abdicating before the really hard stuff, and distancing himself from any failure to deliver more meaningful devolution. Negotiate the new deal, then stand down. That would be an honourable thing to do.
 
That's not actually quite correct. While the Tories only won one seat in 2010, their share of the vote at 16.7% was only 2.2% behind that of the second-placed Lib Dems and 3.2% behind the third-placed SNP. Their lack of MPs is an artefact of the FPTP system we have. As with the Tories in the 1980s, Labour benefitted a lot from the opposition splitting the vote. If you look at the electoral results, the Tories came second or a close third in a lot of places.
Yeah, I know that, but I was responding to a post about what Cameron will or won't do between now and May 2015. Whilst he now has to offer something - and some sort of vaguely something/nothing for the rest of the UK - his short term thinking will be more concerned with there being only 1 Tory Mp in Scotland (and not much chance of increasing that).
 
Yeah, I know that, but I was responding to a post about what Cameron will or won't do between now and May 2015.

Cameron's a cunt. He's already passed the buck to Hague. Who's conveniently leaving and so won't actually do anything.
 
I'm sure something will come out of this constitutionally, but it's hard to say what till the dust settles. However now the vote has been won Cameron has no great incentive to please Scottish voters, particularly as he has only 1 MP in Scotland (and not many MSPs to lose in 2016). It's a mess really, Miliband might end up being the one putting all this into practice, but has his ultimate battle with the SNP to factor in. Cameron ain't got fuck all in Scotland but has to worry about his backbenchers and, most of all, what Farage will do with any promises he makes.
Scottish voters are collateral- Cameron wants to finess Labour. He's proposing Scottish MPs shouldn't vote on English matters: so if the predictions are correct and after next May there's a Lab majority of 30, propped up by 40 ScotLab MPs, then a Labour government has a majority on UK-wide issues but is in the minority on England only matters.

Cameron has much to gain.
 
Im glad of the result. Im neither a Unionist or a Monarchist but my head always said keep things as they are but make change from within. It will cause a seismic shake up in the way people view politics now, maybe. Maybe im just rambling. It would have too much hassle to split everything up. I am just rambling.
 
20 odd years ago i was a fervent Nationalist & would have done anything to see my country gain independence but my opinion, like my feelings towards the England football team, have softened over the years. I just didnt see what benefit would have been gained from independence. I salute all those who spoke articulately & heartfelt about it danny la rouge weepiper especially, forgive me if i have missed anyone out My feelings & opinion may well have been different if i still lived in Scotland.
 
Balls. He's abdicating before the really hard stuff, and distancing himself from any failure to deliver more meaningful devolution. Negotiate the new deal, then stand down. That would be an honourable thing to do.
From the tone of this post it seems that you think Salmond is the only member of the SNP capable of leading the negotiations, which is a bit of a slap in the face to the many other SNP members who could make a decent fist of it. Who's to say that he won't form part of the negotiating team anyway, just not with the additional responsibilities of first minister? I'd imagine that the proposals put forward from the Westminster side will be laced with all sorts of tricks and traps. It would be easier to focus on the details of the negotiations without the obligations of the first minister job potentially getting in the way.

Then again, maybe he has just chucked his dolly out the pram and they're all now fucked in the upcoming negotiations...
 
From the tone of this post it seems that you think Salmond is the only member of the SNP capable of leading the negotiations, which is a bit of a slap in the face to the many other SNP members who could make a decent fist of it. Who's to say that he won't form part of the negotiating team anyway, just not with the additional responsibilities of first minister? I'd imagine that the proposals put forward from the Westminster side will be laced with all sorts of tricks and traps. It would be easier to focus on the details of the negotiations without the obligations of the first minister job potentially getting in the way.

Then again, maybe he has just chucked his dolly out the pram and they're all now fucked in the upcoming negotiations...

He's kind of unlucky in that an outlier poll put YES ahead and others mis-stated YES's support by an extra 3-4 percentage points.

This meant the result was more seen as a disappointment.

And may have helped him feel he had to quit.
 
Thanks for explaining that to me captain obvious! The city can once again sleep tonight knowing that you are on the case to demystify such complexities to the rest of us! :D
 
It's also not impossible that it was the decision of his wife who, at 76 to his 59, might have said something like: 'Enough of the politics for now - we are not going to live for ever.'
 
20 odd years ago i was a fervent Nationalist & would have done anything to see my country gain independence but my opinion, like my feelings towards the England football team, have softened over the years. I just didnt see what benefit would have been gained from independence. I salute all those who spoke articulately & heartfelt about it danny la rouge weepiper especially, forgive me if i have missed anyone out My feelings & opinion may well have been different if i still lived in Scotland.
Great post. More of this.
 
20 odd years ago i was a fervent Nationalist & would have done anything to see my country gain independence but my opinion, like my feelings towards the England football team, have softened over the years. I just didnt see what benefit would have been gained from independence. I salute all those who spoke articulately & heartfelt about it danny la rouge weepiper especially, forgive me if i have missed anyone out My feelings & opinion may well have been different if i still lived in Scotland.

heard a Scottish No voter on radio yday saying, in very non triumphalist tone, that he felt good about contributing to the stopping of an inbuilt Tory majority in England for the next 40 years....

Was good to be reminded of the fundamentally decent intentions of so many No's....

But then he's probably just helped ensure Scotland will swap between the Tories and near identical New Lab for the forseeable future.
 
Of course it is. As the leader, he's taking full responsibility, as is fit and proper.

He's also clearing the way for his replacement before the General Election next year, of course.
He also swore that he wouldn't step down if he lost the referendum. So he shows himself to be just as much of a lying cunt as the rest of them when things don't go his way. (Though I think he's always come off as being from the nastier side of politics)
 
From the tone of this post it seems that you think Salmond is the only member of the SNP capable of leading the negotiations, which is a bit of a slap in the face to the many other SNP members who could make a decent fist of it. Who's to say that he won't form part of the negotiating team anyway, just not with the additional responsibilities of first minister? I'd imagine that the proposals put forward from the Westminster side will be laced with all sorts of tricks and traps. It would be easier to focus on the details of the negotiations without the obligations of the first minister job potentially getting in the way.

Then again, maybe he has just chucked his dolly out the pram and they're all now fucked in the upcoming negotiations...
I have no opinion either way about his competence or importance to his party. I was merely commenting on the honourability of resigning at such a moment.
 
He also swore that he wouldn't step down if he lost the referendum. So he shows himself to be just as much of a lying cunt as the rest of them when things don't go his way. (Though I think he's always come off as being from the nastier side of politics)
I'm sure you've never changed your mind about your own intentions. Or is it only politicians you expect to be hostage to everything they ever said sometime in the past, despite changed circumstances?

And, of course, you don't know if the great and the good in the SNP handed him a loaded revolver.
 
Back
Top Bottom