Fuck him the neoliberal prick, the idea that he isn't part of the establishment is ludicrous.
I'm sure something will come out of this constitutionally, but it's hard to say what till the dust settles. However now the vote has been won Cameron has no great incentive to please Scottish voters, particularly as he has only 1 MP in Scotland (and not many MSPs to lose in 2016). It's a mess really, Miliband might end up being the one putting all this into practice, but has his ultimate battle with the SNP to factor in. Cameron ain't got fuck all in Scotland but has to worry about his backbenchers and, most of all, what Farage will do with any promises he makes.I don't think so. We're less than 9 months off an election, and there's now a head of steam building as all sorts of people spot the possibility for constitutional realignment. Cameron has promised change since the result, all the party leaders promised something before it.
We'll see but it looks to me like 9 months of constitutional arguments. What will come of that will depend on balance of forces, of course.
Nothing honourable about stepping down now. He can step down if he wants, but the next year is really important for the SNP. Potentially it is the period in which the powers of a Scottish parliament are set for the next generation.But honourable.
Those who quaked at the polling booth and erred for the known instead of a chance to see what could have been possible, good or bad, will lay in their beds tonight and wonder if they have let slip a new beginning.
Cameron ain't got fuck all in Scotland
Nothing honourable about stepping down now.
Balls. He's abdicating before the really hard stuff, and distancing himself from any failure to deliver more meaningful devolution. Negotiate the new deal, then stand down. That would be an honourable thing to do.Of course it is. As the leader, he's taking full responsibility, as is fit and proper.
He's also clearing the way for his replacement before the General Election next year, of course.
Yeah, I know that, but I was responding to a post about what Cameron will or won't do between now and May 2015. Whilst he now has to offer something - and some sort of vaguely something/nothing for the rest of the UK - his short term thinking will be more concerned with there being only 1 Tory Mp in Scotland (and not much chance of increasing that).That's not actually quite correct. While the Tories only won one seat in 2010, their share of the vote at 16.7% was only 2.2% behind that of the second-placed Lib Dems and 3.2% behind the third-placed SNP. Their lack of MPs is an artefact of the FPTP system we have. As with the Tories in the 1980s, Labour benefitted a lot from the opposition splitting the vote. If you look at the electoral results, the Tories came second or a close third in a lot of places.
Yeah, I know that, but I was responding to a post about what Cameron will or won't do between now and May 2015.
Scottish voters are collateral- Cameron wants to finess Labour. He's proposing Scottish MPs shouldn't vote on English matters: so if the predictions are correct and after next May there's a Lab majority of 30, propped up by 40 ScotLab MPs, then a Labour government has a majority on UK-wide issues but is in the minority on England only matters.I'm sure something will come out of this constitutionally, but it's hard to say what till the dust settles. However now the vote has been won Cameron has no great incentive to please Scottish voters, particularly as he has only 1 MP in Scotland (and not many MSPs to lose in 2016). It's a mess really, Miliband might end up being the one putting all this into practice, but has his ultimate battle with the SNP to factor in. Cameron ain't got fuck all in Scotland but has to worry about his backbenchers and, most of all, what Farage will do with any promises he makes.
I am just rambling.
Well not yet i amnt but the night is still young.As long as you're not naked, then that shouldn't be a problem caller.
Doubt it unless the party boots himBookies giving 2/1 that he's gone in 48 hours.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/bc147fac-1003-11e4-80b1-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3DoDxCTxCwhats that then
From the tone of this post it seems that you think Salmond is the only member of the SNP capable of leading the negotiations, which is a bit of a slap in the face to the many other SNP members who could make a decent fist of it. Who's to say that he won't form part of the negotiating team anyway, just not with the additional responsibilities of first minister? I'd imagine that the proposals put forward from the Westminster side will be laced with all sorts of tricks and traps. It would be easier to focus on the details of the negotiations without the obligations of the first minister job potentially getting in the way.Balls. He's abdicating before the really hard stuff, and distancing himself from any failure to deliver more meaningful devolution. Negotiate the new deal, then stand down. That would be an honourable thing to do.
From the tone of this post it seems that you think Salmond is the only member of the SNP capable of leading the negotiations, which is a bit of a slap in the face to the many other SNP members who could make a decent fist of it. Who's to say that he won't form part of the negotiating team anyway, just not with the additional responsibilities of first minister? I'd imagine that the proposals put forward from the Westminster side will be laced with all sorts of tricks and traps. It would be easier to focus on the details of the negotiations without the obligations of the first minister job potentially getting in the way.
Then again, maybe he has just chucked his dolly out the pram and they're all now fucked in the upcoming negotiations...
Great post. More of this.20 odd years ago i was a fervent Nationalist & would have done anything to see my country gain independence but my opinion, like my feelings towards the England football team, have softened over the years. I just didnt see what benefit would have been gained from independence. I salute all those who spoke articulately & heartfelt about it danny la rouge weepiper especially, forgive me if i have missed anyone out My feelings & opinion may well have been different if i still lived in Scotland.
20 odd years ago i was a fervent Nationalist & would have done anything to see my country gain independence but my opinion, like my feelings towards the England football team, have softened over the years. I just didnt see what benefit would have been gained from independence. I salute all those who spoke articulately & heartfelt about it danny la rouge weepiper especially, forgive me if i have missed anyone out My feelings & opinion may well have been different if i still lived in Scotland.
He also swore that he wouldn't step down if he lost the referendum. So he shows himself to be just as much of a lying cunt as the rest of them when things don't go his way. (Though I think he's always come off as being from the nastier side of politics)Of course it is. As the leader, he's taking full responsibility, as is fit and proper.
He's also clearing the way for his replacement before the General Election next year, of course.
I have no opinion either way about his competence or importance to his party. I was merely commenting on the honourability of resigning at such a moment.From the tone of this post it seems that you think Salmond is the only member of the SNP capable of leading the negotiations, which is a bit of a slap in the face to the many other SNP members who could make a decent fist of it. Who's to say that he won't form part of the negotiating team anyway, just not with the additional responsibilities of first minister? I'd imagine that the proposals put forward from the Westminster side will be laced with all sorts of tricks and traps. It would be easier to focus on the details of the negotiations without the obligations of the first minister job potentially getting in the way.
Then again, maybe he has just chucked his dolly out the pram and they're all now fucked in the upcoming negotiations...
He also swore that he wouldn't step down if he lost the referendum.
I don't blame him. He must be knackered from two years of campaigning. He has done all he can & there won't be another referendum in his political career.I had forgotten that.
I'm sure you've never changed your mind about your own intentions. Or is it only politicians you expect to be hostage to everything they ever said sometime in the past, despite changed circumstances?He also swore that he wouldn't step down if he lost the referendum. So he shows himself to be just as much of a lying cunt as the rest of them when things don't go his way. (Though I think he's always come off as being from the nastier side of politics)