how strange, then, that that is precisely what you are saying.Obviously I'm not saying that a single mother can't raise a son successfully.
how strange, then, that that is precisely what you are saying.
yes, you're saying *women can't do the job*To their mothers maybe, not to their fathers.
Over half of American children will live in a fatherless home for at least part of their childhood. That's an amazing statistic, and completely unprecedented. It's bound to have massive psychological effects, and the lack of sympathetic male guidance is bound to effect their attitudes to women. Enter Roosh...
how come you say this here but in other posts on this very thread you say that living in a household headed by a woman increases a boy's chances of falling prey to roosh or his ilk?I put it to you that living with one's mother suggests an affection and sympathy for women in general that is likely to seem attractive to potential girlfriends.
You do know that women advise each other to study their prospective partners' relation with their mother carefully?
I think he was saying (absent) fathers can't do the job.
i think he was saying that present mothers can't do the job.I think he was saying (absent) fathers 'can't do the job'.
if you really thought that you wouldn't have laid the blame at 38% of households headed by women but 38% of fatherless families.Exactly.
It's not very difficult to understand, unless one is willfully misrepresenting.
i think he was saying that present mothers can't do the job.
you seem obsessed by farmyard animals.In which case you are demonstrably wrong.
Perhaps you were distracted by the goat?
I've had a word with the US state department, but that's a story for another time.
I got to use their Starbucks.Ah, go ahead. Sounds more interesting than the clusterfuck this thread has become.
the "Humans of Washington" facebook page.
or many a book about ideologyMust be smaller than The German Jokebook.
I got to use their Starbucks.
And later on I had my photo taken by a wee lad who claimed to be from the "Humans of Washington" facebook page. Strangely, my picture never appeared on said page. . .
maybe you didn't look human enoughI got to use their Starbucks.
And later on I had my photo taken by a wee lad who claimed to be from the "Humans of Washington" facebook page. Strangely, my picture never appeared on said page. . .
<wookiehowl>maybe you didn't look human enough
Yeah, I'd keep quiet about that too if I were you.
The desperation has toppled over into nuttiness. The flak he's been taking has clearly got to him and he's clutching at straws to defend himself and flipping out.
He doubled down, then quadrupled down, now he's all in with a busted flush . It's definitely gotten to him . Why can't he just accept he was peddling wrongness and it's pissed a lot of people off and made him quite unpopular ? Like that's basic common sense . he didn't even need to change, he could have just said nowt and gotten away with it much like before .
But no, he's decided to insist the world at large must agree he's actually right . What a dick. Because if he succeeds in being so doo Lally that he fucks up his current paying gig he's pretty much done for . Nobody will ever employ this prick . And he's becoming or became socially toxic . If he manages even to alienate his circle of followers he's completely bollocksed. There'll be nobody else .
What's he going to do then ? Hang around bars in his 40s like some old creepy dude ?
Like I do. At least I've a fucking job though .
To venture a guess, it's because his whole way of operating in the world is that of a child having a temper tantrum. He didn't get that elusive thing he wanted, or if he did he found he didn't want it anymore and had to rip it apart (again like a tantruming toddler). I don't think logic or common sense really fits into the equation with someone like that.
Jesus. Just read a couple of other pieces by him, they belong on a Roosh-type forum not in a popular newspaper.Shitty misogynist articles in the Telegraph written by the editor of Loaded (and friend of Milo Yiannopoulos) explicitly promoting MRAs may certainly create more of them.
the telegraph not popular hereJesus. Just read a couple of other pieces by him, they belong on a Roosh-type forum not in a popular newspaper.
Mainstream.Common is the word I was looking for
bourgeoisMainstream.