Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Roosh V, Pro-Rape Pick Up Artist, Announces Worldwide 'Tribal Meetings'

How could there be any empirical evidence for that? There couldn't. The only possible evidence would be rational.

Now, correlation is not causality, but the emergence of Roosh (and he's far from alone) obviously suggests some kind of serious social dysfunction.

It seems to me that only a young man entirely lacking in sensible or responsible male guidance could be taken in by such charlatans
.
You said^^
Well, clearly the absence of male guidance is according to you a necessary condition, and I grant that you didn't claim it was a sufficient one. But you are suggesting that there is a tendency for single mothers to be unable to give their sons adequate guidance here. Which is fanciful.
 
You said^^
Well, clearly the absence of male guidance is according to you a necessary condition, and I grant that you didn't claim it was a sufficient one. But you are suggesting that there is a tendency for single mothers to be unable to give their sons adequate guidance here. Which is fanciful.

No I'm not suggesting that. I'm suggesting what I said: "only a young man entirely lacking in sensible or responsible male guidance could be taken in by such charlatans."

Which is obviously true. Unless you think that a young man who had experienced such guidance could be taken in by such people?
 
No I'm not suggesting that. I'm suggesting what I said: "only a young man entirely lacking in sensible or responsible male guidance could be taken in by such charlatans."

Which is obviously true. Unless you think that a young man who had experienced such guidance could be taken in by such people?
Now you're being disingenuous. You missed out the earlier bit of your post, which I also quoted there because I was replying to that too:
How could there be any empirical evidence for that? There couldn't. The only possible evidence would be rational.

Now, correlation is not causality, but the emergence of Roosh (and he's far from alone) obviously suggests some kind of serious social dysfunction.
Can't you just admit this was a wild generalisation?
 
No I'm not suggesting that. I'm suggesting what I said: "only a young man entirely lacking in sensible or responsible male guidance could be taken in by such charlatans."

Which is obviously true. Unless you think that a young man who had experienced such guidance could be taken in by such people?
I have never, ever talked about sex with my dad. The very idea makes me squirm even now. I'm sure I'm not that atypical.
 
You are the only person who has said that, or who believes it.

Oh y'know you nearly landed something with the 1st line, but throwing it away with the 2nd comment.

I'll say one thing Phil when you stick your oar in, you never know where a thread is going to be derailed to.
 
Oh y'know you nearly landed something with the 1st line, but throwing it away with the 2nd comment.

I'll say one thing Phil when you stick your oar in, you never know where a thread is going to be derailed to.
oh you do know

pretty_vacant.jpg
 
The thing is dwyer, the Rooshy problem doesn't start with teenage sexuality. It starts when children are raised by whatever parent without a due regard for other human beings. It starts when they are toddlers. And it won't start at all with decent parenting, which can be provided by one or two parents of any gender. Unless of course the child has some sort of neurological problem which makes empathy impossible.
 
show me where i have said 'i find [x] admirable about ac'

You practically worship the nutcase. Actually, skip the "practically." All anyone needs to do is search your posts for his name.

Rather than deny it, which just reveals you as a liar, you'd be better advised to explain it.
 
Well, as a single parent for some years, I do have to agree that this is not really an ideal situation...for anyone...but I do have to refute the simplistic charges of harm being done to our unfathered sons because hey...life is complicated. See, while I was doing the sole parenting for a few years, it is fair to say that male role-models for my son were usually readily available because we did not live on an isolated one family outer-Hebridean croft but in a provincial town. My reasonable insistence that single -parenting is not always an easy route rests less on gender balance and more on the quantity of available support. Any single parent household, of whatever gender, will experience considerable difficulties - not least because of the sheer demands of parenting...and add in a modicum of financial insecurity and the difficulties add up.
I am aware of the often right-wing and reactionary diatribes against the single parent family and will concede that, according to some metrics, children are often disadvantaged...but whether this is because of lack of a male father figure...or more likely because it is tiring and stressful to be a fully engaged parent ALL THE TIME without respite...is a wild accusation which bears a more nuanced analysis.

eta - I wouldn't want to speculate why Daryush V is such a despicable arsewipe.
 
Last edited:
You practically worship the nutcase. Actually, skip the "practically." All anyone needs to do is search your posts for his name.

Rather than deny it, which just reveals you as a liar, you'd be better advised to explain it.
i see what you mean. there are 115 results to a search for his name. but there are 297 posts in which you refer to jesus. is there something you should be telling us?
 
Back
Top Bottom