Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

RIP Sarah Everard, who went missing from Brixton in March 2021

I just worry how many women had a close call with this guy, how many were raped, how many he almost killed and how many women he's killed before her. I would not be at all surprised if there wasn't something like Operation Anagram set up to investigate the wider picture.

This was too slick, too practised, too obvious. It was done in Brixton ffs. There were other people about.
I really do think there has to be a societal change whereby the automatic assumption that a police officer arresting someone is somehow beyond question shifts to a position whereby any exercise of coercion or control should be up for question. And if the police don't like that idea, perhaps they'd have been better off keeping their own house in order, rather than allowing someone to get away with behaviour that brings the whole edifice into disrepute.

I mean, presumably, dialling 999 and saying "I saw someone who appears to be a policeman bundling someone into a car" ought to be enough for them to fairly quickly ascertain whether it's legit or not. This should have never happened, and I'd be interested what police forces around the country are going to start doing (they've had enough time) to ensure it never happens again.
 
I really do think there has to be a societal change whereby the automatic assumption that a police officer arresting someone is somehow beyond question shifts to a position whereby any exercise of coercion or control should be up for question.
I very much hope that shift has just happened.
 
I don't blame the couple who drove past and assumed it was a legit arrest by a plain clothes person. But what would have given me pause would have been a) a lack of a flashing dome light on the dashboard and b) his lack of partner, with possibly c) a lack of any police markings on his clothing, such as an over jacket or hiz viz, or even police written on a baseball cap.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, of course
 
I'd say that it was a very likely potential consequence of training people "to keep their emotions in check". Because, when you encourage - or coerce - people to repress their emotions, some of those feelings are going to emerge in less-expected directions. For example, people with a strong desire to control or coerce others are often people who have experienced emotional difficulties around control elsewhere in their lives.

Flinging labels like "compulsive psychopath" at people serves no good end - if we want to prevent stuff like this happening, rather than merely froth at the terribleness of it all, we need to step back from glib conclusions and labelling, and start looking at underlying causes, early warning signs, etc.

My point was more that impulsiveness/poor self-control is recognised as a part of psychopathy, whereas it seems all the more creepy when it's someone who appears able (possibly through training) to control themself, but chooses not to.
 

I watched an interesting documentary a while back about women in the Met and one described how she'd gone for a drink with several colleagues at the police social club after shift, and one known for sexual harassment picked her up and slammed her onto the snooker table. She said she was praying she wasn't raped there and then. She also never reported it.

That was the 1970s and I know things are supposedly different. But are they really?
 
It’s an important distinction. We can’t tackle male violence until we can name it.
Absolutely. We have an epidemic of male-on-female violence, and only now are we starting to see tiny signs that it is going to be taken more seriously. I'm not holding my breath on it resulting in anything like a thorough examination of why some men behave in these ways, though. I only know of one academic study into 'family annihilators', a crime that is doubling every year.
 
Absolutely. We have an epidemic of male-on-female violence, and only now are we starting to see tiny signs that it is going to be taken more seriously. I'm not holding my breath on it resulting in anything like a thorough examination of why some men behave in these ways, though. I only know of one academic study into 'family annihilators', a crime that is doubling every year.
although sadly, it’s not an epidemic as it’s always here and always happening
:(
 
I think a copper committing this type of crime in this type of way should face a far far greater punishment than their crime normally incurs. Because a message needs to be sent to serving officers as a deterrent and spur for them to change their collective "us and them" view of themselves. Things have to change.
 
Back
Top Bottom