Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Question Time tonight

I've not idea what the first sentence means. The rest is your usual bullshit but keep defending anti-working class, transphobic scum like Wings, you usually do. Filth.
 
Let me tell you something...you sad sack cunt...the vast majority of people in Wales are like the vast majority of the people in the rest of the UK. They are in relatively low-income jobs.

The media and the right wing politicians, who are now by far the majority, constantly blame benefits claimants and immigrants for the difficulties that people in low paid jobs suffer.

This constant bombardment has had an effect....fucking obviously from the lurch to the right in UK politics.

Wales is the closest place to England, it only has about 2 million people. It has no national broadcaster...only the UK decides what is broadcast...get it?

The pro-Wales party constantly rails against these things. (Fortunately they have a good online presence.)

'These things' being anti-immigrant, anti-benefits (scroungers you know) and the aggression of UK politics. And they are pro-education, pro-apprenticeship, pro-renewable energy. Many pros...look them up.

No other party in Wales speaks for those things.

As to your wings thing...take it to wings mate. You can post there but they have a rule. Might be a bit of a challenge for you though ;)

'Don't be a dick.'
 
As they went through their weekly NHS chat on QT, someone suggested that pharmacies, amongst others, could be brought on board to a greater extent. This chimed with me, particularly if that engagement involves Alliance Boots paying a bit more tax in the UK.
 
I've not idea what the first sentence means. The rest is your usual bullshit but keep defending anti-working class, transphobic scum like Wings, you usually do. Filth.
You're a real charmer, aren't you :)

Such a way with words, especially making up new hate words. How about inventing transupporting instead? I would have gone for transupporting. It's positive, sends a positive message.

But like most squirrels...your shit is a bit nutty, isn't it.

Did you see that woman on QT talking about Britain ruling the world for thousands of years? You'd have liked her.
 
You're a real charmer, aren't you :)

Such a way with words, especially making up new hate words. How about inventing transupporting instead? I would have gone for transupporting. It's positive, sends a positive message.

But like most squirrels...your shit is a bit nutty, isn't it.

Did you see that woman on QT talking about Britain ruling the world for thousands of years? You'd have liked her.
I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, but you calling anyone nutty is ludicrous.

In what weird word is transphobic a hate word? Is homophobic a hate word too? Or are you denying that discrimination against transgendered people exists? The only hate/discrimination going on here is that of Campbell, which you don't see to have any problem with.
 
Last edited:
Given Gromit's long history of misogyny, finding out he is a transphobic pig as well is about as shocking as an intemperate tweet from Trump
 
I might be. But for good reason. Two peas in a pod
You certainly are. You both stomp in with accusations that are fuck all to do with the topic and then sit and hope someone else gets involved so you can get a good argument going and disrupt the thread.

Meanwhile all those working class types you're sticking up for can by found in the queues to join the tories and kippers...so you best shoot off.
 
Tomorrow night's line-up, from Glasgow; Scottish secretary David Mundell, shadow attorney general Shami Chakrabarti, deputy first minister of Scotland John Swinney, crime writer and broadcaster Val McDermid and director general of the Institute of Economic Affairs, Mark Littlewood.
 
adden ‏@BenMcFadden10 3h3 hours ago
"Next question. Yes, the young lady at the back with the Union Jack t-shirt, behind the gentleman in the orange sash."

C4zPg9YXUAArvrs.jpg

4 replies33 retweets64 likes
 
I wonder if there'll be a fifth question, after the inevitable ones on Brexit, Trump, the NHS and Scottish independence.
 
Rubbish, UKIP took a 12.5/13.0% share of the vote in the 2015 Welsh Assembly Elections and a 27.6% share of vote (finishing 2nd just behind Labour) in the 2014 EU elections in Wales.

The poor polling of UKIP in Scotland (and London) doesn't mean that they aren't polling as the third most popular party in the UK as a whole. As for the "promotion" stuff, :rolleyes: it's probably the same people that published all those polls biased against the pro-independance side before the Referendum.

EDIT: UKIP also finished 3rd in the 2015 GE in Wales in terms of vote share 13.6% compared to PCs 12.1%

I don't doubt your figures, but they seem to have a great deal of trouble translating % of vote into parliamentary seats. Yet another reason to keep 'first past the post'.
 
I don't doubt your figures, but they seem to have a great deal of trouble translating % of vote into parliamentary seats. Yet another reason to keep 'first past the post'.
So we should argue in favour of electoral systems that block parties we/you like?

I mean I'm an anarchist, so I couldn't' really give a stuff, but that seems like a pretty cynical position for someone who believes in liberal democracy to be arguing.
 
So we should argue in favour of electoral systems that block parties we/you like?

I mean I'm an anarchist, so I couldn't' really give a stuff, but that seems like a pretty cynical position for someone who believes in liberal democracy to be arguing.
I'm not suggesting 'blocking' anyone; however, if the current system keeps UKIP pretty much out of parliament, I am not sorry.
 
Back
Top Bottom