Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
he had a gap in his busy social calendar and he's an auld mate of the dimbleby so to stop him having a dull evening in watching springwatch he asked if he could answer some questions.So, why was Joey Barton on?
he had a gap in his busy social calendar and he's an auld mate of the dimbleby so to stop him having a dull evening in watching springwatch he asked if he could answer some questions.So, why was Joey Barton on?
hmmm, I wonder....
This thread had 50 posts covering the previous ten editions of the show. And over 120 since Barton's appearance was announced. 150,000 @BBCQT tweets - a new record. The viewing figures aren't in yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was the most watched episode since Griffin was on.
they still can't match the late great bill grundyIt's not that anyone gives a toss about him, it's just that he was always likely to say something stupid/outrageous. Same reason they get 'kippers on so regularly.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en-gb"><p>.<a href="https://twitter.com/bbcquestiontime">@bbcquestiontime</a> have refused to take a Liberal Democrat panellist tonight.</p>— Lib Dem Press Office (@LibDemPress) <a href="">May 29, 2014</a></blockquote>Wonder why there wasn't a libdem on the panel; they must have been invited. Perhaps Clegg forbaded them?
Could it really? If I said 'UKIP man is pointless man' would that also be 'fairly sexist'?This could also be taken as fairly sexist tbf
you don't know how it works do you?Could it really? If I said 'UKIP man is pointless man' would that also be 'fairly sexist'?
Thankfully, very few make remarks a stupid as Barton's so there's usually no need. Not sure if the procedure of saying something sexist and then only apologising after being prompted by an audience member is something to be congratulated. I'd rather people like Barton were kept off the show, which I felt reached a new low last night.
Offensive sexist drivel?Oh, that's alright then. It's just fine to come out with offensive sexist drivel on what is supposed to be an intelligent show so long as you apologise later on (but only when prompted by a member of the audience).
I'd rather see Barton than Owen Jones, bog standard journos, political courtiers etc.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en-gb"><p>.<a href="https://twitter.com/bbcquestiontime">@bbcquestiontime</a> have refused to take a Liberal Democrat panellist tonight.</p>— Lib Dem Press Office (@LibDemPress) <a href="">May 29, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Why?
I'd rather see owen jones; from a welfare perspectie at least he knows the issues and the stories.I'd rather see Barton than Owen Jones, bog standard journos, political courtiers etc.
Interesting...
perhaps there is more to this?
Ah here we go with the ad hominens, courtesy of a thread from six fucking years ago being dug up to 'prove' some piss weak point.
Oh aye, and any answers is the place for that right enough. Whatever it is.He is outside the Westminster bubble. But footballers and other celebrities are in there own bubble. Prefer any answers myself. Am less interested in being patronised and more in the range and scope of how we Joe Public are feeling. Is still at the mercy of editorial bias though
are you kidding? Any Answers only gets airtime to make the contributors to Any Questions look sane and rational.He is outside the Westminster bubble. But footballers and other celebrities are in there own bubble. Prefer any answers myself. Am less interested in being patronised and more in the range and scope of how we Joe Public are feeling. Is still at the mercy of editorial bias though
To be honest I'm not that fussed at seeing anyone, I don't normally watch it and only saw Barton's sexist bit when alerted from here last night. But to answer your question, the politicians, journos and commentators they normally have, whatever their specific views are part of the political class - Barton isn't. He's a full on idiot in terms of some the things he's done and also some of his twitter splatters. But he also says interesting things and is often sound on equality type stuff. I also loved his plain speaking about shit England player bringing their books out straight after a failed world cup. He's probably locked into an embrace with the media as much as anyone else, but well, I think people sneer at him for the wrong reaons. He is a dick, but it's his class that they are really sneering at.Why?
they weren't on last night either...unlike the ukips. Aren't their views on runway expansions valid? Says it all really.Greens could rightly gone mental if there was a yellow tie and not them.
are you kidding? Any Answers only gets airtime to make the contributors to Any Questions look sane and rational.
I haven't seen any sneering at his class.To be honest I'm not that fussed at seeing anyone, I don't normally watch it and only saw Barton's sexist bit when alerted from here last night. But to answer your question, the politicians, journos and commentators they normally have, whatever their specific views are part of the political class - Barton isn't. He's a full on idiot in terms of some the things he's done and also some of his twitter splatters. But he also says interesting things and is often sound on equality type stuff. I also loved his plain speaking about shit England player bringing their books out straight after a failed world cup. He's probably locked into an embrace with the media as much as anyone else, but well, I think people sneer at him for the wrong reaons. He is a dick, but it's his class that they are really sneering at.
I like to sneer at him for the horrible violence he has administered in the pastHe is a dick, but it's his class that they are really sneering at.
Can't disagree with that.I like to sneer at him for the horrible violence he has administered in the past
phone in radio is generally best avoided, its true.Better than most other phone in radio though.
they weren't on last night either...unlike the ukips. Aren't their views on runway expansions valid? Says it all really.
Indeed.I like to sneer at him for the horrible violence he has administered in the past
TV public debate looks stale and stage managed...phone in radio is generally best avoided, its true.
The one medium that makes internet message boards look calm and coherent.
Well, you have to pick your way through it. He's done plenty of horrible things - and said even more. Sometimes that's what's in play, but even more it's 'ooh, look, he likes art', 'philosopher king of football!', 'ha ha he reads books'. None of that can be reduced down to sneering about footballers per se.I like to sneer at him for the horrible violence he has administered in the past
Genuine question : Has TTIP ever been mentioned on QT?