This would just create more unemployment among younger people.
No, because there won't be so many younger people.
This would just create more unemployment among younger people.
No, recording starts about 8.30 for 10.40 transmissionI believe it is transmitted almost live - only a few seconds delay so they can bleep out expletives. The repeats are another matter, of course.
are you planning on killing them?No, because there won't be so many younger people.
Wow. Really wow.No, because there won't be so many younger people.
No, recording starts about 8.30 for 10.40 transmission
It's been that way for at least 20 years.Then it's changed, evidently for the worse.
It's been that way for at least 20 years.
It was about 22 years ago that i was in the audience.It was about 25 years ago that my father was in the audience.
are you planning on killing them?
So what? They didn't just entirely stop breeding. If (something like) 8 million people have to work ten years longer, that's 8 million jobs unavailable to (something like) seven million odd young people who are newly entering the labour market.Heh Population decrease means fewer people being born, which means fewer young people.
So what? They didn't just entirely stop breeding. If (something like) 8 million people have to work ten years longer, that's 8 million jobs unavailable to (something like) seven million odd young people who are newly entering the labour market.
It's about quartz not understanding that an aggregate total of 8 million kids actually doesn't go down if more people live longer - despite being a smaller proportion of total population.You are assuming a fixed supply of jobs. But more people working means more people earning and spending, which in turn leads to higher growth and more jobs available.
I've no idea what the rest of this conversation is about, by the way. But whatever it is, the fixed-job supply argument (usually raised by immigrant bashers) is simply wrong.
It's about quartz not understanding that an aggregate total of 8 million kids actually doesn't go down if more people live longer - despite being a smaller proportion of total population.
No i'm not.You're misrepresenting me.
No i just think the BBC, like a lot of mainstream journalism, doesn't really see how serious the government is fucking people over. The BBC also has this weird notioin that discussion shoudl be robust and that every point of view should be heard (well almost, see above). In other words, and by way of an example, you get James Delinpole being invited on to discuss Global Warming, when all this does is give lie to the fact that the science is indisputable and the consensus that we are fucking the planet is well into the 90% ramge. IYSWIM.Thanks, so it is being manipulated then?
I think it's recorded well ahead of time.I believe it is transmitted almost live - only a few seconds delay so they can bleep out expletives. The repeats are another matter, of course.
No i just think the BBC, like a lot of mainstream journalism, doesn't really see how serious the government is fucking people over. The BBC also has this weird notioin that discussion shoudl be robust and that every point of view should be heard (well almost, see above). In other words, and by way of an example, you get James Delinpole being invited on to discuss Global Warming, when all this does is give lie to the fact that the science is indisputable and the consensus that we are fucking the planet is well into the 90% ramge. IYSWIM.
I think it's recorded well ahead of time.
I see everyone's favourite Douglas Murray is on tonight
Who the fuck is the woman in the green dress? She's coming out with untold amounts of shite!