Nah...it's a challenge that he doesn't have to respond to. Answer her lawyers questions under oath, he would probably get to see them (the questions) before-hand.When is says papers filed in court, what have they actually filed for? Criminal charges or are they suing him?
Who really believes this cunt did not do all he is accused of and more?
It was like finding out Liberace was gay.
Now it looks like Bill Clinton is in the frame with this pair of shites:
http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-c..._medium=recirculation&utm_campaign=thursdayPM
clinton or nixon, who goes down as the biggest liar to get caught
When is says papers filed in court, what have they actually filed for? Criminal charges or are they suing him?
Sadly the more bigwigs that get dragged into this the less likely it is that any of them will be brough to book for any of it.
the establishment closing ranks ennitMade me so angry the way this was reported on R4 this morning. They were reporting it as if he had definitely done nothing and the whole issue was nothing but an image problem. There was a parade of fuckers from Davos saying things like, "Yah, Andrew just needs to improve his image" leading me to shout "and, just maybe, stop fucking under aged girls!" at the radio. Shitbags, the lot of them.
Innocent until proven guilty is bollocks in this case because it's unlikely to ever see a day in court. Can't help but see some similarities between this and Assange although Prince Andrew won't have to literally hide in an embassy.
Made me so angry the way this was reported on R4 this morning. They were reporting it as if he had definitely done nothing and the whole issue was nothing but an image problem. There was a parade of fuckers from Davos saying things like, "Yah, Andrew just needs to improve his image" leading me to shout "and, just maybe, stop fucking under aged girls!" at the radio. Shitbags, the lot of them.
Yes, that amused me. She said it more than once too.One of the people interviewed also basically described him as dull, thick and loyal...a thoroughly decent chap.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
Yes, that amused me. She said it more than once too.
Made me so angry the way this was reported on R4 this morning. They were reporting it as if he had definitely done nothing and the whole issue was nothing but an image problem. There was a parade of fuckers from Davos saying things like, "Yah, Andrew just needs to improve his image" leading me to shout "and, just maybe, stop fucking under aged girls!" at the radio. Shitbags, the lot of them.
I'm still not sure if this is a civil case or a criminal case?
I'm still not sure if this is a civil case or a criminal case?
Surely in the US one generally follows the other with these sort of matters? Unless the civil case is hush money.
It's a bit betwixt and between as far as I understand.
The instant case is largely procedural, in that it's an application for disclosure regarding a plea bargain that Epstein struck with the prosecutors, which arguably infringed statutory rights. So the underlying matter is a criminal prosecution but this proceeding goes towards the details of that settlement deal, which would appear to be a civil issue.
All these high profile male public figures standing behind Handy Andy need to be added to the operation Yewtree to-do list pronto.
One of the people interviewed also basically described him as dull, thick and loyal...
Two out of three's not bad.
Now it looks like Bill Clinton is in the frame with this pair of shites:
http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-c..._medium=recirculation&utm_campaign=thursdayPM