Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Political polling

The problem is that hoping that the Tories and LibDems do badly necessarily entails hoping somebody else does well.
Or accepting it's the inevitable result.

I will laugh like a drain and feel all warm and fuzzy if Labour do badly in Scotland.
 
Doesn't help with the Blairites knocking chunks out of the party's campaign on the NHS. It's almost as if the pricks want to lose so their worldview can be proved right, that Blairite 'centrism' is the only way to victory. There is no alternative.

Labour’s failures ‘worse than Kinnock’, says David Hare
Playwright says Ed Miliband is struggling to take advantage of the open goals provided by a Tory prime minister

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...ures-worse-than-kinnock-playwright-david-hare


Now its(the criticism) from the Left with David Hare sticking his oar in

tbh, bit baffled by this, labour are now starting to offer some decent polices, today they said they would set up community transport trusts to run buses, etc and warned the existing bus companies to pull their socks up, of course it could be all talk.

anyway, why now just before an election, does he want the other Milliband back?
 
Last edited:
“Why can he not, in the words of one veteran Labour MP in the play, ‘get up and take the whole rotten thing on?’ But to ask that question is to misunderstand what rhetoric is. Rhetoric is not an add-on, an extra. It’s not a trick, a facility or a gift. The sober truth is that you can only make a great speech if you have a great analysis.”

I do agree with this, there are awful things that are happening but Milliband is not angry enough.
 
Open goal is the word - this week we've had news of failings in schools, prisons and hospitals, easy to link all this together and say the government has 'lost a grip' on public services. Stuff like this isn't even contentious with the middle of the road voters in the way that getting angry and taking a stand on things like welfare would be - it's everyday bread-and-butter issues.
 
Open goal is the word - this week we've had news of failings in schools, prisons and hospitals, easy to link all this together and say the government has 'lost a grip' on public services. Stuff like this isn't even contentious with the middle of the road voters in the way that getting angry and taking a stand on things like welfare would be - it's everyday bread-and-butter issues.
It's only an open goal if you're playing for the other side.
 
Open goal is the word - this week we've had news of failings in schools, prisons and hospitals, easy to link all this together and say the government has 'lost a grip' on public services. Stuff like this isn't even contentious with the middle of the road voters in the way that getting angry and taking a stand on things like welfare would be - it's everyday bread-and-butter issues.

Crises in Prisons/the justice system, are usually political dynamite and have led to ministers resigning in the past, now it just seems to waft over them.
 
Last edited:
It is an open goal, and such an obvious one that the only reason it's been missed (or more accurately not fired at) is because they've chosen not to.

Ask yourself why that might be.
 
If they criticise them too much then they will reduce their future use of the patronage/money making machine.
 
Have a think about it. My main election wish is that the Tories lose and lose big. They may well win at this polling-trend rate. I call that incompetence (principally, but yes true all the other stuff's there too) on the part of the so-called 'Official Opposition'. Hardly that controversial to say that.
 
Yes. You're saying (I think?) that its deliberate that they're not doing so. The more I think about how many open goals are being missed, the more I think you have a big point. But there's no way incompetence doesn't play a big part as well. They're failing so abjectly to advance in the polls -- that's a major, and incompetent, fail simply in terms of electoral strategy if no more.
 
I don't really have hopes of that -- and haven't for years. There'll never be anything from Labour (and even less from the fringes further left) that's getting anywhere. Labour never sound even mildly leftish at the very best, and that's no surprise. But even if they did go through a few mildly leftish sounding motions, I'd prefer that (just about) to nothing, the complete absence of any half way competent opposition from them that we have now.

Not really ready to go much further with this conversation tonight -- too depressing.

As are the polls, to sort-of bring it back on topic ...
 
So where does competence come in? Labour are clearly pursuing an electoral strategy that doesn't include going through some mildly leftish sounding motions. I'd guess the main reason for this is because they hope to woo swing tory/labour voters - the people who essentially decide elections, and who are scared off by mildly leftish motions.

If you're wanting a party with socialist or social democrat policies, then the Labour Party are awful. But they aren't incompetent - they're just not a socialist or social democrat party.
 
Last edited:
Labour are a pro-austerity, militarist, pro Trident, pro corporation, party of the neoliberal elite. When in power - as they were only a few years ago - they were tough on disabled people, single parents, civil liberties, poor people, immigrants, and everything that should be defended.

Their only virtue is that they aren't formally The Tories. But that is in name only.

They can go fuck themselves.
 
Labour are a pro-austerity, militarist, pro Trident, pro corporation, party of the neoliberal elite. When in power - as they were only a few years ago - they were tough on disabled people, single parents, civil liberties, poor people, immigrants, and everything that should be defended.

Their only virtue is that they aren't formally The Tories. But that is in name only.

They can go fuck themselves.
:D
 
Opinium (for the Guardian) have polled just over 500 'first-time voters...

...which they've compared with their "adult" voting intentions...

df23dfa4-e096-4b0a-a908-c3b7b8f4c894_zpsbaeac4bd.png
 
Labour are a pro-austerity, militarist, pro Trident, pro corporation, party of the neoliberal elite. When in power - as they were only a few years ago - they were tough on disabled people, single parents, civil liberties, poor people, immigrants, and everything that should be defended.

Their only virtue is that they aren't formally The Tories. But that is in name only.

They can go fuck themselves.

Ok yes, but clearly they weren't as austere as the Tories are now or there wouldn't have been anything to cut. That's a marginal but important difference.

Sadly they were also worse militarist bastards than even Thatcher was.

Another Tory led coalition will go full speed on dismantling welfare and the NHS. Labour won't, but say it's all shit and all the same by all means. You are not wrong, but not wholly right either.
 
Ok yes, but clearly they weren't as austere as the Tories are now or there wouldn't have been anything to cut. That's a marginal but important difference.

Sadly they were also worse militarist bastards than even Thatcher was.

Another Tory led coalition will go full speed on dismantling welfare and the NHS. Labour won't, but say it's all shit and all the same by all means. You are not wrong, but not wholly right either.

Not sure that "vote Labour and we promise to dismantle the welfare state at only 95% of the speed the Tories would" is going to win them too many new supporters, I'm afraid...
 
Back
Top Bottom