Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Political polling

22nd and 23rd century historians are going to have a right laugh at these silly polls from the Former Regime.
 
Last edited:
We in the new Republic are in an abject mess due to the incredible and mind-blowing failures of the Former Regime. There is so much work to do at grassroots level to build a sane civic society. For example - millions of people can't read very well or at all and are alienated from the 21st century Internet Revolution. What can be done about this urgent problem?
 
Last edited:
We in the new Republic are in an abject mess due to the incredible and mind-blowing failures of the Former Regime. There is so much work to do at grassroots level to build a sane civic society. For example - millions of people can't read very well or at all and are alienated from the 21st century Internet Revolution. What can be done about this urgent problem?

Had to Google this. Apparently 1 in 5 people in England, and 1 in 4 Scots are functionally illiterate! :(
 
And you lack basic numeracy skills if you think 16.4% is one in five. It's slightly less than one in six.

I was rubbish at maths at school but my mum was a private maths tutor and is excellent. I have great respect for mathematicians although my mind is literary and works that way instead. I enjoyed Hannah Fry's mathematics programmes on BBC One a while back on iPlayer but I might have an issue with her about Platonic ideals and how they relate to maths but who knows - will be an interesting discourse if we ever meet up for a green tea or a camomile tea or something in LDN.
 
Last edited:
Being functionally illiterate does not invalidate your opinions nor necessarily make you ignorant. With radio and TV news and documentaries, films and biographies, potted history etc on the telly, you could be functionally illiterate nowadays and yet know and understand more than the average person a few decades ago. Much more so the average person from the 19th century or before. It's how you handle your illiteracy or lack of numeracy that matters. If your inadequacy makes you feel bad about yourself then it will affect your life adversely in myriad ways. If it doesn't then it needn't.
 
Being functionally illiterate does not invalidate your opinions nor necessarily make you ignorant. With radio and TV news and documentaries, films and biographies, potted history etc on the telly, you could be functionally illiterate nowadays and yet know and understand more than the average person a few decades ago. Much more so the average person from the 19th century or before. It's how you handle your illiteracy or lack of numeracy that matters. If your inadequacy makes you feel bad about yourself then it will affect your life adversely in myriad ways. If it doesn't then it needn't.

Interesting but how could we expect people to keep up with our transition from the Jurassic era to the 21st century if they can't join Urban75 and read this explosion of documents and sources? Imagine having to watch the Orwellian telescreen the whole time. Imagine if you watched the 'news' channel and thought any of it was reality. Precisely how deluded would you be?
 
Interesting but how could we expect people to keep up with our transition from the Jurassic era to the 21st century if they can't join Urban75 and read this explosion of documents and sources? Imagine having to watch the Orwellian telescreen the whole time. Imagine if you watched the 'news' channel and thought any of it was reality. Precisely how deluded would you be?
Imagine reading Urban and believing it was true.
 
Interesting but how could we expect people to keep up with our transition from the Jurassic era to the 21st century if they can't join Urban75 and read this explosion of documents and sources? Imagine having to watch the Orwellian telescreen the whole time. Imagine if you watched the 'news' channel and thought any of it was reality. Precisely how deluded would you be?
You raise an intriguing point. Who is most likely to fall for the fascist big lie? The illiterate sceptic? Or the gullible, literate, uneducated?
 
Worth thinking about this piece from Jacobin, that while talking about the US, is pertinent to the above politics.






I do not agree with all of Karp's thesis but he is absolutely correct in this final paragraph

And compare that against Akehurst's piece (my emphasis)
no mention of social democracy (let alone socialism). Progressivism (which the LDs are to be part of) is the goal
Yes; interesting to hear so much of the post Chesham+Amersham chatter focusing on the alignment of the home-owning (& aspirant) segment. Some seeing danger for the Tories in losing their aging, pensioner home-owner nimby core vote whilst trying to attract the 'replacement cohorts' with 'promises' of house building and exploring how the "progressives" can exploit that psephological conundrum.

This sort of stuff probably excites Starmer no end.
 
Yes; interesting to hear so much of the post Chesham+Amersham chatter focusing on the alignment of the home-owning (& aspirant) segment. Some seeing danger for the Tories in losing their aging, pensioner home-owner nimby core vote whilst trying to attract the 'replacement cohorts' with 'promises' of house building and exploring how the "progressives" can exploit that psephological conundrum.

This sort of stuff probably excites Starmer no end.
TBF, Labour's big majorities in 01/05 were quite reliant on a strong LD vote to siphon support away from the Tories. It's no good getting 40% of the vote when the Conservatives get even more.
 
Can imagine the true believers at Starmer Towers funding great solace in that "n/c" leaving them trailing by just 14 % points.

1624288530486.png
 
We've turned the corner, know...onwards to victory in Batley & Spen....then go back to your constituencies and prepare.....

 
Sadly those figures don’t show that. Don’t forget the idiot Fox and his cobelievers would have voted ‘no’ there
Fair point; though I suspect the timing of the sudden inflexion in the graphed numbers suggest that most are reacting negatively to Johnson's dangerous 'experiement'; I'd imagine that the 'Fox brigade' would long have been in the 'No' camp anyway?

1626986717297.png
 
Back
Top Bottom