We in the new Republic are in an abject mess due to the incredible and mind-blowing failures of the Former Regime. There is so much work to do at grassroots level to build a sane civic society. For example - millions of people can't read very well or at all and are alienated from the 21st century Internet Revolution. What can be done about this urgent problem?
Had to Google this. Apparently 1 in 5 people in England, and 1 in 4 Scots are functionally illiterate!
And you lack basic numeracy skills if you think 16.4% is one in five. It's slightly less than one in six.Had to Google this. Apparently 1 in 5 people in England, and 1 in 4 Scots are functionally illiterate!
And you lack basic numeracy skills if you think 16.4% is one in five. It's slightly less than one in six.
And you lack basic numeracy skills if you think 16.4% is one in five. It's slightly less than one in six.
Ok, illiterate after all then.It was a typo, ffs.
Being functionally illiterate does not invalidate your opinions nor necessarily make you ignorant. With radio and TV news and documentaries, films and biographies, potted history etc on the telly, you could be functionally illiterate nowadays and yet know and understand more than the average person a few decades ago. Much more so the average person from the 19th century or before. It's how you handle your illiteracy or lack of numeracy that matters. If your inadequacy makes you feel bad about yourself then it will affect your life adversely in myriad ways. If it doesn't then it needn't.
I've met a lot of people who think they're clever when etc etcI've met plenty of people who think I'm clever, when in fact I've just read a lot of books.
Imagine reading Urban and believing it was true.Interesting but how could we expect people to keep up with our transition from the Jurassic era to the 21st century if they can't join Urban75 and read this explosion of documents and sources? Imagine having to watch the Orwellian telescreen the whole time. Imagine if you watched the 'news' channel and thought any of it was reality. Precisely how deluded would you be?
You raise an intriguing point. Who is most likely to fall for the fascist big lie? The illiterate sceptic? Or the gullible, literate, uneducated?Interesting but how could we expect people to keep up with our transition from the Jurassic era to the 21st century if they can't join Urban75 and read this explosion of documents and sources? Imagine having to watch the Orwellian telescreen the whole time. Imagine if you watched the 'news' channel and thought any of it was reality. Precisely how deluded would you be?
Yes; interesting to hear so much of the post Chesham+Amersham chatter focusing on the alignment of the home-owning (& aspirant) segment. Some seeing danger for the Tories in losing their aging, pensioner home-owner nimby core vote whilst trying to attract the 'replacement cohorts' with 'promises' of house building and exploring how the "progressives" can exploit that psephological conundrum.Worth thinking about this piece from Jacobin, that while talking about the US, is pertinent to the above politics.
I do not agree with all of Karp's thesis but he is absolutely correct in this final paragraph
And compare that against Akehurst's piece (my emphasis)
no mention of social democracy (let alone socialism). Progressivism (which the LDs are to be part of) is the goal
TBF, Labour's big majorities in 01/05 were quite reliant on a strong LD vote to siphon support away from the Tories. It's no good getting 40% of the vote when the Conservatives get even more.Yes; interesting to hear so much of the post Chesham+Amersham chatter focusing on the alignment of the home-owning (& aspirant) segment. Some seeing danger for the Tories in losing their aging, pensioner home-owner nimby core vote whilst trying to attract the 'replacement cohorts' with 'promises' of house building and exploring how the "progressives" can exploit that psephological conundrum.
This sort of stuff probably excites Starmer no end.
Turns out that the majority of the electorate are not libertarian, nut-job psychopaths...
Fair point; though I suspect the timing of the sudden inflexion in the graphed numbers suggest that most are reacting negatively to Johnson's dangerous 'experiement'; I'd imagine that the 'Fox brigade' would long have been in the 'No' camp anyway?Sadly those figures don’t show that. Don’t forget the idiot Fox and his cobelievers would have voted ‘no’ there