heh. i only went to WHP once, to this. amazing venue, massively oversold. gouging cunts.I stopped going to the Warehouse project because of this. I told my friends that I wouldn't come any more because it wasn't worth it.
I could just about put up with the ridiculous yoots with their sponsored poker visor things on, and their daft baggy vests. I could stomach the £22.50 entrance fee through gritted teeth. The overpriced, shit drinks were a right kick in the teeth, but the line-up was so good I could justify it as a rare treat. But when I went to see Aphex Twin and I literally couldn't get on the dance floor because it was so rammed, and when I did get near it, my hands were pinned to my sides and people were fucking pogoing up and down - that's when I decided I had had enough.
"I'm not coming any more, this is shit"
"You're just getting old"
"Maybe so, but just so you know, this is the last time I'm coming here"
Two hours later, all my friend were in agreement and we've not been back since. I know the WHP is the worst of the worst when it comes to commercial clubbing, but these DJs were Aphex Twin, Jeff Mills, Modeselektor, etc. Big names in a small scene, IMO. Or so I thought. It felt like I was at an Oasis gig or something.
heh. i only went to WHP once, to this. amazing venue, massively oversold. gouging cunts.
Last time I went to Bussey was a few weeks ago to Saturday night's South London Soul Train. It was very busy, but I thought they managed it quite well. They opened another floor upstairs and they controlled how many people went into the downstairs room to stop it getting too overcrowded. I am sure it was a pain for people in the queue to have to wait, but there wasn't room for them inside and it was to the club's credit that they didn't just take the money and try and squeeze them in. Would be surprized if it gets that busy on Wednesday though, even with a big name DJ (Bambaataa).
my favourite club i went to looked like a david lynch film with smoke, light and cages and even though the room was small it was like the walls went on to infinite, and to move around you could just dissolve into the walls and emerge wherever you wanted to be.
this is what i call a good dancefloor, i was somewhere in here.
Sounds like that bunkr room in the new tresor in Berlin. Very dark, smoke, big holes in the walls leading to nowhere, concrete and fucking loud!
This. The whole culture of the DJ being the star of the night is utterly ridiculous. They play records*. That's it.No offence to DJ's, but one is much the same as another once you've established that they're playing a genre of music you like.
For the vast majority out there I reckon a blindfolded audience wouldn't ever be able to tell one DJ from another.still utterly wrong everytime you post this
woahh check out the guy doing the splits at about 5:15. i do remember that night well. lights were fully up for the whole night.that looks proper
Yeah, this is my gripe, the "going to see" someone play! I mean WTF?I don't know if it's down to festivals but there does definitely seem like more of a 'gig' type approach a lot of the time. Cram everyone in, facing towards the stage.
Lights are the big problem with that video. Otherwisewoahh check out the guy doing the splits at about 5:15. i do remember that night well. lights were fully up for the whole night.
Personally I believe people dance less because they do less ecstacy.
+1Yeah, this is my gripe, the "going to see" someone play! I mean WTF?
definitely agree - who is responsible for this i wonder? rigging companies?totally agree about the stage designs turning what should be a rave into some sort of gig... a million lights at the front and all of them on all the time. theres just no need.
the last decent design ive seen at a big event recently was a one nighter in a black box style warehouse space, they'd stuck the stage in one corner then done a ridiculous lighting rig throughout the venue, hundreds of Sharpy moving heads on wonky trusses really low overhead and they used them sparingly. the end result was a nice dark space with people dancing facing in every direction and a lot of people falling over when the lighting operator really went for it. bliss.
Its a good point and genre nights usually mean 8hours of music in exactly the same mould. This is part of the 'drop' culture, and general movement away from depth and musical elements for straight rhythmic ones. Its not a totally lost art, but its definitely a problem out there.I can't remember the last time I saw a DJ who was willing to venture outside one particular subgenre and play something the crowd wasn't expecting. Possibly because the typical drug-addled raver brain is ill equipped to deal with such things.
Now that I think about it, the last DJ I saw who was willing to play anything and everything that got people dancing was Mr Scruff, who coincidentally tends to play smallish, friendly venues that aren't so packed that nobody can move.
Yes and no - if you look at the club scene pre-ecstasty: B-Boys and B-Girls, Northern Soul, Disco, Jazzcoteque dancers, Electro, all had full focus on dancing. The change in drug use has changed some things but you dont need MDMA to have a party, just a funky beat and you to get it started and aaah we'll dance the night awayPersonally I believe people dance less because they do less ecstacy. I think you get overcrowding because people are willing to accept it, if they have just had a drink. If everyone were E'd up it would simply get too hot very quickly and people wouldn't tolerate it.