Treacle Toes
Time
Want one of my narnas?
All over the media when a very prominent Irish swimmer (who never tested positive!) was winning medals. All over cycling forums whenever Americans posted. All over these forums when this proven doping violator won. To give just three examples. You name the sport, if someone is succesful enough, quite a lot of people from their own country will defend them no matter what the evidence is.
Of course when I say "defend them", I don't mean putting forward reasonable arguments on their behalf. By and large it quickly degenerates into shouting killjoy at anyone concerned with the truth, sneering, insulting, and sticking your fingers in your ears. The tragic thing is that the "patriotic" Brits who just want to cheer on success, and screw the dodgy circumstances, are actually undermining one of the policies that the British team has that is worth supporting. It's far more impressive to me that the British team has a policy of slinging out doping violators that it would be for any number of drug cheats to win in British colours.
Ah so it's blind nationalism that gets your goat?
The people cheering on Ohuruogo are undermining that policy, by showing clearly that for them success matters more than competing clean.
I pretty much agree with the above.This kind of comment is all too common from people who don't understand how drug testing works. The tests, particularly in-competition tests, only catch the stupid, the unlucky or the desperate. That's because many drugs are undetectable and even most of the detectable ones (particularly various forms steroids) are taken mostly during out of competition periods, when testing is less frequent.
This particular athlete was not banned for missing a test. She was banned for missing three out of competition tests, which is considered firm enough evidence of doping by pretty much every sport to land you a ban. Get that? Not one test. Not two tests. Three of them. She is a drug cheat, just as much as someone caught with anabolic steroids in their piss, or someone who never tests positive but who gets done for tampering with a sample.
Far from thinking, as some idiot above suggests, that there is something wrong with winning a medal for Britain, I actually think that Britain is one of the few countries which operates a correct policy of banning anyone done for a doping offence from competing at the Olympics. Ohuruogo used the Court of Arbitration to circumvent that ban. She shouldn't be there, and people cheering her on just because she is British are undermining their own team's anti-doping policy.
As for the testing procedures being "ridiculous", no, they are not. Everyone else on the British team managed to avoid missing three tests, as did thousands of other Olympic athletes. As I explained above, out of competition tests are the most important element of the testing regime. The ones in competition are mostly for show. Cheats miss out of competition tests because they don't want to be tested while detectable substances are still in their body. It's a perfectly rational thing to do if the test is likely to catch you. The first couple of times you don't even get a ban. Even a third time the competition ban is shorter than it is for a positive test.
Innocent until proven guilty? I hate to break it to some of you, but she has in fact been proven guilty.
Has he been tested since his win??????
There's no way she can really be proven guilty though right now, so there is no real argument to base this on.
Indeed.
<snip
Woof
Is there any point in asking you again, nicely, to take this onto another thread? This is about Track and Field.
You've said what you want to say, many times now. Thank you for the illumination but you're wrecking this thread. There are other threads about doping.Blind nationalism and willful stupidity both. Anyone who can look at athletics, see a proven doping violator put in a great performance to win a medal, and still come away thinking "I'll give her the benefit of the doubt, now stop moaning you bunch of killjoys", is in my view at the very best extremely naive.
You've said what you want to say, many times now. Thank you for the illumination but you're wrecking this thread. There are other threads about doping.
You really are quite tiresome.
Whatever the truth of it is.....well done to her on her win !
This is about Track and Field.
Sick! Sick I tells ya! SICK!! SICK!!! SICK!!!!!No.
This is about drug cheats and money.
And repression and totalitarianism.
It's fucking sick!
Woof
You really don't want to undertand do you; she was guilty.I'm going to continue enjoying it until she's been officially been found guilty for this final she won, until then, its ALL just speculation. People are confusing their beliefs with facts.
Perhaps you should start a new thread called something like "Track and Field: Blindly positive discussion amongst the naive, the one-eyed, the credulous and the foolish". I promise you that I won't post in it.
I'm going to continue enjoying it until she's been officially been found guilty for this final she won, until then, its ALL just speculation. People are confusing their beliefs with facts.
UKA, WADA and BOA all cleared her to be in the Olympics. Game over.You really don't want to undertand do you; she was guilty.
While all her fellow competitors were being tested, she went missing - and she was banned.
You really don't want to undertand do you; she was guilty.
While all her fellow competitors were being tested, she went missing - and she was banned.
And that's the attitude that Nigel is, I feel rightly, criticising.
You seem to be saying that you are happy that the olympics is essentially a competition between chemists, in which case, it seems that you are cheering the wrong person for the win - the boffins should be on the podium.
Woof
I'm assuming the governing body was happy for her to compete....they sorted out the Dwayne Chambers affair against a lot of opinion that wanted him at the olympics.
Sick! Sick I tells ya! SICK!! SICK!!! SICK!!!!!
UKA, WADA and BOA all cleared her to be in the Olympics. Game over.