Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

new season of Strictly Come Dancing!

That was impressive, but it was more a circus act than anything you could call dancing.
 
they said earlier that ''the top 2 have the same number of votes''

now they are saying ''your votes will be carried over to the final''

wtf?

My guess is that something went wrong with the phone voting. Tess said at the beginning of the programme that they'd had to close the phone lines.

Something is definitely amiss. Am trying to speak to the Press Office to find out.
 
they said earlier that ''the top 2 have the same number of votes''

now they are saying ''your votes will be carried over to the final''

wtf?
Yeah, run that by me again?

I was confused about that when they said it at the start. What, the votes were exactly the same? :hmm:

Do you think this was always planned, so they could have a 3 couple final? :hmm:
 
I was under the impression from when John Sergeant dropped out that they normall have a 3 couple final.

Seem to remember them saying that it would be interesting having 2 couples in the final.

So that might be why.

Or I might have made that up in my head.
 
I was under the impression from when John Sergeant dropped out that they normall have a 3 couple final.

Seem to remember them saying that it would be interesting having 2 couples in the final.

So that might be why.

Or I might have made that up in my head.
Yes, they normally have a 3 couple final, but if somebody's Dad dies, or John drops out, then the arithmetic doesn't work.

So, we were all set for this being a two couple final...when, oh dear, something happened with the phone lines.
 
thats a bit wank, why didnt they just miss a week on air instead?

oh well, good job i never actually bother to vote :D

:hmm:
 
I think it's because there's no way Tom could have avoided being in the bottom 2 and in the dance-off, because the two girls got 3 points and he only got 1. -

Rachel 3
Lisa 3
Tom 1

So even if he came top of the public vote and got 3 points for that one of the girls would still get 2 points for coming 2nd with the public and so beat him eg

Rachel 3 + 2 = 5
Lisa 3 + 1 = 4
Tom 1 + 3 = 4


Therefore (imo) the bbc reckoned they'd be committing some sort of fraud on us* because they say "if you want to keep x from the dance off, vote for them" They hadn't worked out what would happen if 2 of the 3 couples tied for top place with the judges.

*And obviously then there would be a bigger scandal than J Ross and R Brand and probably Gordon Brown and the Archbishop of Canterbury would have to resign.
 
I think it's because there's no way Tom could have avoided being in the bottom 2 and in the dance-off, because the two girls got 3 points and he only got 1. -

Rachel 3
Lisa 3
Tom 1

So even if he came top of the public vote and got 3 points for that one of the girls would still get 2 points for coming 2nd with the public and so beat him eg

Rachel 3 + 2 = 5
Lisa 3 + 1 = 4
Tom 1 + 3 = 4


Therefore (imo) the bbc reckoned they'd be committing some sort of fraud on us* because they say "if you want to keep x from the dance off, vote for them" They hadn't worked out what would happen if 2 of the 3 couples tied for top place with the judges.
<doh> I think you're right.

Why couldn't Tess have explained it like that?
 
It'll be better with a 3 way final anyway I reckon - I think Tom probably has a good chance of winning if it's all the public vote in the final - can't remember if that's how it works in the final?

Gives the tabloids more fodder for the next week anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom