That was impressive, but it was more a circus act than anything you could call dancing.
fuck a duck.
was that planned then?
they said earlier that ''the top 2 have the same number of votes''
now they are saying ''your votes will be carried over to the final''
wtf?
Yeah, run that by me again?they said earlier that ''the top 2 have the same number of votes''
now they are saying ''your votes will be carried over to the final''
wtf?
Yup, but it didn't make sense.Tess said at the beginning of the programme that they'd had to close the phone lines.
Oh! Wonderful!:
everyone is crying and jumping!
Yes, they normally have a 3 couple final, but if somebody's Dad dies, or John drops out, then the arithmetic doesn't work.I was under the impression from when John Sergeant dropped out that they normall have a 3 couple final.
Seem to remember them saying that it would be interesting having 2 couples in the final.
So that might be why.
Or I might have made that up in my head.
have i missed something?
They put all 3 acts through!!!!! BOLLOX
what???! what's the point of that?
thats a bit wank, why didnt they just miss a week on air instead?
oh well, good job i never actually bother to vote
Oh dear. Shouldn't have done that.
Would the BBC actually dare try another phone-in con, though?
<doh> I think you're right.I think it's because there's no way Tom could have avoided being in the bottom 2 and in the dance-off, because the two girls got 3 points and he only got 1. -
Rachel 3
Lisa 3
Tom 1
So even if he came top of the public vote and got 3 points for that one of the girls would still get 2 points for coming 2nd with the public and so beat him eg
Rachel 3 + 2 = 5
Lisa 3 + 1 = 4
Tom 1 + 3 = 4
Therefore (imo) the bbc reckoned they'd be committing some sort of fraud on us* because they say "if you want to keep x from the dance off, vote for them" They hadn't worked out what would happen if 2 of the 3 couples tied for top place with the judges.