Indeed, definitively axed.yeah that was never going to happen. Anyone who says otherwise can meet me at the carpark of a coppers pub in south london for a full and frank exchange etc
Indeed, definitively axed.yeah that was never going to happen. Anyone who says otherwise can meet me at the carpark of a coppers pub in south london for a full and frank exchange etc
I'm struggling to comprehend just how evil Starmer is.Unreal. Suspended for wanting labour to NOT starve kids
I'm struggling to comprehend just how evil Starmer is.
Before the vote, Mr McDonnell said: "I don't like voting for other parties' amendments, but I'm following Keir Starmer's example as he said put country before party." The decision to remove the whip is an early show of force from the new government. This is their first rebellion. Even though it is a small one, Labour whips are trying to send a message to MPs that dissent will not be tolerated in votes. However, there are many more Labour MPs who are opposed to the two-child benefit cap. Many hope the party will make a decision in the coming months to scrap it.
It's really easy to understandI'm struggling to comprehend just how evil Starmer is.
I'm struggling to comprehend just how evil Starmer is.
I knew the self defined 'unapologetic zionist' was pure evil but these suspensions even exceeded my expectations of the bastard. Three out of seven are 'Muslim' MPs but who cares, Starmer has already stated he couldn't give a shit about the Muslim vote.It's really easy to understand
Many stripey backsI wonder what the first whipped vote on the Palestine conflict will bring.
meet the new boss..."Vote Labour to get the Tories out," they said.
I wonder what the first whipped vote on the Palestine conflict will bring.
I don't know enough about the process... I'm assuming the 7 can't vote on anything while suspended? If so, Starmer will already have removed a few "pro-Palestine" votes.
They can vote, the only difference is that they are not obliged to follow a whip.
LOL. Such a gentle way of putting "EXPELLED FROM THE PLP".
They sit as Independents now.
I agree.What is particularly unfair about this is that it doesn't apply to child benefit itself. People who are on good incomes will still get child benefit for 3rd and subsequent children, but the very poorest, who rely on means-tested benefits, don't get any additional money in their Universal Credit or child tax credits for having another child.
It also disproportionately affects women, because they are the resident parent in most single parent families, earn less than men on average, and are therefore more likely to be reliant on benefits. Families who come from cultures where having lots of children are also more likely to be affected.
Utter bastards, the lot of them, except for the rebels.
This is the Sad But True of it. There are other ways to protest and try to pass legislation against the cap, but they chose the worst (from the PLP's POV) way of doing it.It’s suspension rather than expulsion though.
The King’s Speech is a finance bill, so technically it’s a vote of confidence. Voting for another party’s amendment against a three line whip is basically asking for suspension.
They can vote, the only difference is that they are not obliged to follow a whip.
She’s not. She’s just being contrarian.When Braverman is to the left of you then I don't really know what to say.
This is the Sad But True of it. There are other ways to protest and try to pass legislation against the cap, but they chose the worst (from the PLP's POV) way of doing it.
Not commenting on right or wrong, but that is how the system works and has always worked. None of them should be surprised in the least.
A) None of them are in the least surprised. Zarah Sultana says she slept well last night.
B) It is not the way 'the system has always worked'. Suspension was not inevitable. Blair never suspended the 47 MPs who did a similar thing in a similar situation in 1997. This is a completely intolerant approach from Starmer. Even people who followed the Whip are appalled.
The Nottingham East MP, Nadia Whittome, who did not vote for the amendment but spoke earlier in favour of abolishing the cap, said: “The government’s approach to party discipline has been appalling. No MP should have lost the whip for their vote this evening, especially on a policy that almost everyone in Labour opposes.
“Our party has a huge majority. If it is to govern from a position of strength, it should be able to tolerate disagreement without making threats and employing the most severe punishments.”
“This does not breed a healthy culture,” she added. “If MPs are unable to stand up to the frontbench when they think they’re wrong, the government is more likely to make poor decisions.”
The really funny thing of course is that Labour might (according to some observers) actually U-turn on the cap anyway at a later date. In which case they will have suspended 7 MPs for upholding principles the Party actually backs. Though I'm not holding my breath on that one it is a view expressed by supposedly a majority of Labour MPs.
By convention, finance bills are votes of confidence. The suspended MPs effectively said they have no confidence in the government and want another election.
This is how it's been for over a century. Find me an MP who didn't lose the whip for voting against their own government's finance bill. There are rules and conventions in Parliament. MPs are free to break them, but there will be consequences for it. Compare it to the Maastricht vote.Jfc. Not even the most rabid Labour right-winger I've read has come out with this bollocks.
As a House of Commons Library note on this topic sets out, the suggestion that a Queen’s Speech or budget is tantamount to no confidence is not clear. A Queen’s Speech is the first indication that the government can demonstrate it can command confidence. However, the vote in itself is not a strict confidence motion.