Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

New Labour government - legislative agenda

They've five years to sort it out I guess. Unsurprising it's not in this parliament.

Presumably there will be local elections before then, so the sooner the age is changed, the better. Perhaps Shammer has figured out it might benefit the Greens more than Labour? Or it's just another promise to roll back on?
 
Presumably there will be local elections before then, so the sooner the age is changed, the better. Perhaps Shammer has figured out it might benefit the Greens more than Labour? Or it's just another promise to roll back on?
"the sooner the better" is one of those silly expressions. you can say it about anything, any measure in isolation. but that doesn't mean much when in reality things ain't happening on their own and you've got the trade off the time between each.
or to put it another way. what'd you bump off the list to make space for that now, rather than in the next 4 years.

"shrug"
 
Crucially this bill does not include public ownership of the rolling stock which it by far the most profitable part of the railways:
View attachment 433889 The Labour Party needs to take on neo-liberalism and the rich

But you just know they won't.
Exactly; the whole Starmer project has been predicated on assuring capital that, in office, the party will present no threat whatsoever to neoliberal accumulation and wealth defence. Quite the opposite; Starmer’s Labour will offer corporate capital huge opportunities to turn tax on labour into profit.
 
Last edited:
Budget Responsibility Bill

Under the current legal framework, there is no requirement on HM Treasury to subject announcements on all fiscally significant measures to independent OBR scrutiny. The Budget Responsibility Bill would therefore seek to ensure that all announcements on fiscally significant measures made by the Government are subject to an independent assessment from the OBR. It does this by requiring HM Treasury, ahead of a Minister making a fiscal announcement to the House of Commons regarding a fiscally significant measure, to commission an economic and fiscal forecast from the OBR. If the Treasury does not make this request and the OBR is of the opinion that the measure is fiscally significant, it also places a new requirement on the OBR to produce assessments of fiscally significant measures as soon as reasonably practicable.

 
It’s a strange hill to die on but I get the impression they’ll be u turning soon.
One can but hope. Particularly as it is such a simple way to help families who are struggling.

I am tired of the idea that you must punish the many in order to catch the few who actually deserve it, whilst ignoring the real problem of tax avoidance. Start punching up instead of down.
 
Last edited:
One can but hope. Particularly as it is such a simple way to help families who are struggling.

I am tired of the idea that you must punish the many in order to catch the few who actually deserve it, whilst ignoring the real problem of tax avoidance. Start punching up instead of down.
Agreed. The optics of it costing about 3 billion which is the exact amount we announced for Ukraine aren’t good either. We really should put these things against each other.
 
The state? Buying things?! With debt?!?! (spit)
I laughed, but the ROSCOs haven't been bad for the rail user. Average age of rolling stock is quite a lot less than it used to be when it was a capital expenditure for the railway itself. Look at the Underground - they own their trains and the Bakerloo and Piccadilly Line both have trains more than 50 years old. It's not that train leasing is inherently good, but the government was always unwilling to do the investment themselves so it has been an improvement in a way.
 
Heres something they wont be doing...


"The second part was intended to examine unlawful conduct within media organizations and the relationship between the press and police but has been on hold since 2018."
 
Piers Morgan breathes a sigh of relief, now he doesn't have to prove himself every bit as innocent as Rebekah Brooks.
 
Just read this interesting analysis of the situation facing this new government: Mansfield is Open for Business | Mathew Lawrence & Sacha Hilhorst
Faced with a public wary of big promises but eager to see change, Labour will receive offers of assistance from private finance giants like BlackRock, Macquarie and Fremman Capital. The UK history of private finance initiatives for public provision suggests that this will be more expensive and less effective, while carrying all the same political uncertainties about the reality of delivery. As it sets out to rebuild the UK, the new government will nevertheless be tempted by this Faustian bargain, which allows it to temporarily avoid the spiky politics of tax rises and greater public borrowing at the cost of turning the country into a giant infrastructure asset.
More in there that sees the odd glimpse of promise but the likelihood that the Faustian temptations will win out.
 
Just read this interesting analysis of the situation facing this new government: Mansfield is Open for Business | Mathew Lawrence & Sacha Hilhorst

More in there that sees the odd glimpse of promise but the likelihood that the Faustian temptations will win out.
The neoliberal corporations much prefer lending the state money than paying tax; that way they get to hold on to their principle and, on top of that, get paid handsomely for it. Why wouldn't they lobby their way to such low risk/high reward pickings? Starmer's LP are a dream come true for them.
 
The argument is that they are inhumane drones, which is true, as soon as they get in it becomes apparent.

But to expect them to overturn the budget on principle two/three weeks in is just laughable shit politics. Not having this 'martyr' shit. They could have bedded in, worked for it and possibly (shock) not gained any recognition or career advantage from it but got shit done. Fuck off.
 
Back
Top Bottom