I did receive an insight in an article I read a few years back about why some actors have more success than others. It was referring to one of those Hollywood actors that has been in more things than you’d think their acting ability justified (I think it might have been Keanu Reeves but that doesn’t really matter). In a moment of candour, a producer said that this actor gets employed a lot basically because they’re a good employee — they work hard, they do it without complaint, they’re always nice to the rest of the cast and crew, no matter how junior, they don’t misbehave, they’re always on time and ready to go etc etc. Their acting was good enough not to really be an issue, at which point all these other things about filmmaking come to the fore. And that’s particularly true for a producer, who has a lot of sway over who gets employed.
Ever since then, I’ve always borne in mind that the opposite is also the case. So it might be that an excellent actor is just a pain in the arse to work with and so not worth a producer’s effort.
I found it a useful reminder that even filmmaking is just a workplace and that the usual human elements come into play.
That's really interesting, bet you it was Keanu Reaves, he does seem like a good guy.