ymu;11925382 because the medics are too afraid to call bullshit on a published author[/QUOTE said:
because of the exact process as demonstrated by this thread.
all the self appointed guardians of truth come and belittle any attempt to come up with ideas that don't fit into their own rigid formula, or use the agreed code words.
and by the time you understand the formula you can't suggest anything original of your own, because all you can do is question the basis or construction of the work of others, in the light of the work of others, that prove in fact we know nothing at all, and so it's better not to act and oh shit i'm being eaten by a tiger
i was challenged to make suggestions- in fact several people were challenged to make suggestions, but i was the only one who dared- and then all that happened was i got ridiculed for daring to stick my head above the parapet
but i stand by a belief that a majority of people accept the line the media feeds them, until they are confronted by a disharmony between what they've been told and their life experience. and because the print media is so stratified, for many people that never happens.
you guys like to refer to sources, i admit i do prefer to contrast what someone is claiming with what has happened in my own experience. often they sync
but if i've widely experienced something that is considered too unpalatable for the academics, such as ignorant and racist people read scandal sheets, it's your failing that you can no longer see that.
we are always challenged to be conscious, ethical consumers. why is there a free pass for consumers of hate sheets?
it's just class snobbery
i sense most people on this thread went to university. if you do manual work for a decade or so you learn that many people do believe what's written in the paps. they will say they don't, but if you ask them about an item in the news you will hear them regurgitate same version that they read in their paper, and many who read the worst tabloids don't watch tv news at all, so they get all their understanding of politics through one biased source.
now i know my use of 'they' and 'these people' is a red flag to those on here, but that's because you speak in terms of research figures or class criticism. i'm talking about my friends, former workmates and immediate family, so i don't feel the need to apologise