ymu
Niall Ferguson's deep-cover sock-puppet
Who was the journo killed?
I don't know why I said investigative reporter there, cos he was a private investigator. A big trial just collapsed. Hang on. I'll get the links.
Who was the journo killed?
Yes. His brother was on. The family knew a lot of it at the time, but not which paper. They are finally getting their say, now the court case is over and people are listening, thanks to the scandal breaking.Not Daniel Morgan is it? Big case (unsolved) in South London quite a while ago
I don't know why I said investigative reporter there, cos he was a private investigator. A big trial just collapsed. Hang on. I'll get the links.
Morgan's brother Alastair and his elderly mother believed, with credible evidence to draw on, that he was killed because he was about to expose a network of corrupt police who were involved in widespread criminality and used Southern Investigations as a conduit for drugs and money. Morgan's business partner, Jonathan Rees, counted many officers as friends. One of his specialities was to use his "friends" in the force to provide information which he sold to tabloid newspapers.
According to The Guardian's piece which broke the story, Surrey police were aware what the NoTW had done.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jul/04/milly-dowler-voicemail-hacked-news-of-world
The paper made little effort to conceal the hacking from its readers. On 14 April 2002, it published a story about a woman allegedly pretending to be Milly Dowler who had applied for a job with a recruitment agency: "It is thought the hoaxer even gave the agency Milly's real mobile number … The agency used the number to contact Milly when a job vacancy arose and left a message on her voicemail … It was on March 27, six days after Milly went missing, that the employment agency appears to have phoned her mobile."
The newspaper also made no effort to conceal its activity from Surrey police. After it had hacked the message from the recruitment agency on Milly's phone, the paper informed police about it. It was Surrey detectives who established that the call was not intended for Milly Dowler. At the time, Surrey police suspected that phones belonging to detectives and to Milly's parents also were being targeted.
One of those who was involved in the original inquiry said: "We'd arrange landline calls. We didn't trust our mobiles."
However, they took no action against the News of the World, partly because their main focus was to find the missing schoolgirl and partly because this was only one example of tabloid misbehaviour. As one source close to the inquiry put it: "There was a hell of a lot of dirty stuff going on." Two earlier Yard inquiries had failed to investigate the relevant notes in Mulcaire's logs.
Yes. Rather shit hot. Worth watching. Brother of the investigative reporter who was murdered whilst investigating News International, and being followed by News International whilst the police had him under surveillance, was interviewed. The implication that Brooks was involved in a contract killing is hard to avoid ...
Is this "hacking" of phones something clever and technical, or does it just work on people who did not bother to set a PIN to control access to their voicemails?
She's entirely amoral and really, genuinely doesn't give a fuck.
How else would someone get to be CEO of News International.
I think because most people didn't expect to be hacked they probably went with really obvious PIN numbers (1111, 1234 etc).Yes. Default PINs is my understanding. Although there was other stuff... blagging private details out of BT by deception, that kind of thing.
Yes. Rather shit hot. Worth watching. Brother of the investigative reporter who was murdered whilst investigating News International, and being followed by News International whilst the police had him under surveillance, was interviewed. The implication that Brooks was involved in a contract killing is hard to avoid ...
The bigger the better.Front page of tomorrow's Independent.
Sorry if a little big.
Murdochs other interests likely to take some sort of collatoral damage as well.
Front page of tomorrow's Independent.
Sorry if a little big.
Is this "hacking" of phones something clever and technical, or does it just work on people who did not bother to set a PIN to control access to their voicemails?
If I want to access my voicemails either from my own phone or from somewhere else, I must type in a 4-digit PIN.
Can these "hackers" get past this, or can they only "hack" those who never set a PIN to limit access?
Giles..