Not sure you need one - I've not got one and it plays for me (and is worth listening to )Could you tell me what she said? I do not have a twitter account.
Religion can fuck off, she doesn't care what's in the bible as it's her body.Could you tell me what she said? I do not have a twitter account.
They are sadists, I'm sure of it. They make these sort of rulings because they enjoy inflicting pain and misery on as many people as they can get away with.
Religion can fuck off, she doesn't care what's in the bible as it's her body.
You can just type in the URL to see the video - you don't need an account, btw.
I don’t think this is true.
Ok, maybe some are sadists, but many see it as protecting the weakest members of society.
Don’t bother arguing against me, I don’t agree with them either, but I think this is in large part where it comes from at the grass roots.
Then there are others lining up to make political capital from it.
The people at the grassroots are not the ones making the rulings.
I don’t think this is true.
Ok, maybe some are sadists, but many see it as protecting the weakest members of society.
Don’t bother arguing against me, I don’t agree with them either, but I think this is in large part where it comes from at the grass roots.
Then there are others lining up to make political capital from it.
Apols if already posted, but YYYYEESSSS!
It’s not that either. Otherwise they would, y’know, be protecting the weakest and the most in need.
It‘s about power and control, especially when it comes to women, and more especially when it comes to women in the midst of life who might conceivably threaten the status quo. Women during childbearing years are potential equals, and they must be brought low, hampered and curtailed in all conceivable ways.
Bur it’s also about their own sense of superiority and righteousness, their self appointed moral authority, the certainty that they are the ones with the hand on the tiller, who hold the moral compass of the nation. The city the hill and all that. They are right and that’s all there is to it. Everyone else is scum.
In order to maintain this superiority they have to keep finding yet more things they can be superior about. The abortion debate is perfect for this.
Well, good luck with that line of thinking.
I don’t think this is true.
Ok, maybe some are sadists, but many see it as protecting the weakest members of society.
Don’t bother arguing against me, I don’t agree with them either, but I think this is in large part where it comes from at the grass roots.
Then there are others lining up to make political capital from it.
I don’t think this is true.
Ok, maybe some are sadists, but many see it as protecting the weakest members of society.
Don’t bother arguing against me, I don’t agree with them either, but I think this is in large part where it comes from at the grass roots.
Then there are others lining up to make political capital from it.
Quite aside from the fact that this is obviously about control, I liked this point:
View attachment 321417
I’m talking about the five ultra-conservative justices who signed the ruling. The dripping sarcasm and callousness of the ruling does suggest sadism to me, I wasn’t being facetious. And their voting history strongly suggests they don’t give a fuck about the weakest in society.
Quite aside from the fact that this is obviously about control, I liked this point:
View attachment 321417
Except animal rights people don't use their arguments to control women's bodies.Another parallel with Animal Rights there.
And with environmentalism. Which is much more directly a case of wanting to protect the unborn.
They're an incessant posting troll, much better reading threads with them on ignoreExcept animal rights people don't use their arguments to control women's bodies.
They're an incessant posting troll, much better reading threads with them on ignore
Somewhat late to this. The whole thing is completely disgusting. Firm believer in a woman's right to choose here. The religious far-right are nasty fucking bigots. Definitely about social control. More awfulness here:
Louisiana bill would allow murder charges for abortions; opponents call it 'barbaric'
As the United States braces for the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade and an end to the constitutional protection of abortion rights, Louisiana lawmakers are advancing legislation that would bolster their ability to criminally punish doctors and individuals who violate the state’s abortion...www.wwno.org
Illustrates the dilemma for Americans, though. They have to reference the constitution. Seems to me that they're trapped by their constitution sometimes. What about when the constitution is inadequate, or just wrong. Maybe they need to aspire to something better. But that's difficult to even talk about.
Another parallel with Animal Rights there.
And with environmentalism. Which is much more directly a case of wanting to protect the unborn.
what you stance on abortion by 8ball
seeming as you appear to be bring up multiple response to posters about other angles to look at this issue
ok cool just making sure you not preforming whataboutism
Really? 8Ball often makes posts that can be leftfield of what is being said in interesting ways. But trolling?They're an incessant posting troll, much better reading threads with them on ignore
Well, good luck with that line of thinking.
Your “they” is very monolithic.
I'm not really that interested in why these 'pro-life' people do the shit they do tbh. Either they understand the consequences and they carry on just the same, or they don't care enough to even bother to think about the consequences. There's no excuse for either of those things.