Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mark Duggan shooting inquest in London finally starts...

what they said was he threw the gun before he was shot > so i thought it more likely to lead to an unlawful killing because he was unarmed. but apparently not.

They'd need unanimity on the jurors believing the copper was not mistaken about the gun but shot knowing he was unarmed.
 
  1. BBC News
    Lawyers are trying to calm the court as people scream "Murderers".

  2. _65824470_000105904-1.jpg

    IN COURT1607: Danny Shaw Home affairs correspondent, BBC News
    There is shouting in court as the public abuse jurors.
 
Are you suggesting there is other stuff to back up the action that's not been mentioned in situ reports?

One would hope so, the way that was reported sounded as if it was one hack passing info to another hack over a headset, with all the possiblity for error that might entail. The written summary of what the jury actually found in each case should explain things further.
 
cunts, this was a plain and simple whack job and they've got away with it again

...and all the more likely in future...

Legal aid cuts 'affect investigations' 1550:
Cuts to legal aid could mean deaths like the police shooting of Mark Duggan are not properly investigated, a charity has claimed.

Deborah Coles, from Inquest which focuses on deaths in custody or at the hands of police, said the money-saving measures would leave bereaved families unrepresented, while the police and other institutions benefit from taxpayer-funded legal teams.
 
jmharingey 4:08pm via web
Family screaming: "what are you running away from." "You are all police, you f**kheads"

jmharingey 4:07pm via web
#Duggan jury have left the court for safety reasons.

jmharingey4:06pm via web
Marlon #Duggan is screaming that police are murderers
 
oooh people getting angry in court., no shit, people shouting, really? :facepalm: and presenter bordering on an imitation of black person complaining a 'black life ain't worth nutting' FOR FUCK SAKE :mad:
 
So he was unarmed but because they believed he was armed this is OK,Jesus.
There literally is no defence against 'we believed' - you can do anything - within mad limits. But it's an open invitation on the personal level to do stuff like this and on the collective level to do even worse. This is law out of control, out of societies control . Even from the small fingerhold we had on it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom