Listing the variables and, in your own words, knowing whether or not, eg, individual plane parts were doused in bio - antagonistic fluids is not the same thing is it? Pardon me if you have such knowledge, I doubt you do. Also pardon me for not looking back through 62 pages of thread, I'll be truly grateful of you do it for me, but my point was not the Guardian nor anyone else to my knowledge was providing diagrams with Chris Morris arrows any time in advance suggesting plane parts were certain to start turning up on Mozambique and Reunion. If you have such Guardian diagrams and articles from 24 months ago, happy for you to show me. All I've seen, and what you've linked to here, are justifications 'after he event' (ie after things started showing up) for finding the flaperon on Reunion. I'm not saying those oceanographic models are wrong or made up by lizards, just pointing out that as far as I know they were only enacted to justify things once a part was found.
You need to look up what hyperbole is. It's not pulling random figures out of an orifice for the sake of it. It's a literary device to make a point. But you knew that right? You just like belittling because, having science on your side and all that, you obviously need sarcasm too right?
I have never once suggested the aircraft was lost just off SE Africa. Nor that the lizards put the parts there. But, later today or tomorrow, I will offer you, as I seem to be being pushed into it, an alternative explanation of sorts.