Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 vanishes without trace

[planetgeli]

yeh. but at least he's not an inadequate liar: as you most certainly are.

Strange that you should use the word 'inadequate' Geoffrey...

...you, and your bully soul-mate are not worth the shit on my shoe and are everything that is wrong with this website.

Strange that you should use the phrase 'hasten his departure from the boards' (I'm not going anywhere fuckface)

Its almost as if you, and your bullying prat of a friend, not a real friend, you don't have any of those, but a virtual friend, its almost as if you were trying to drive away any opposition of your infantile posturing from these boards you feel a, very conservative, sense of entitlement to. Almost like that eh? For you, and this dickhead pretend revolutionary, pretend friend of yours, the one with his head up your arse, seem to think that if you follow people around, bullying them, especially women, because that's the kind of low-life you both are, you seem to think that will retain your entitlement to an internet message board, the like of which is the only place you get a feeling of empowerment from in your very fucking sad lives. Now, if Mr Strasse removes his head from your arse and inserts his dick up there, maybe, just maybe, you could both lose your virginity and the rest of us could get on with having, erm, discussion, on a discussion board, without self-centred non-revolutionary pricks like yourselves spoiling it for everyone?

 

[planetgeli]

Where's the evidence of any fire in this incident? What have occasional fires (which occur across airliners of all models) got to do with the disappearance of MH370?

Ta-da! No plane, no evidence. PS Hypoxia.

So anyway. What's your theory out of interest?

 

[2hats]

Ta-da! Hypoxia.

Can't make your mind up eh? First fire. Now hypoxia. Alien abduction or CIA mind ray next?

So anyway. What's your theory out of interest?

All been covered some two years back in this thread. Time for you to do some work now and go and read it properly.

 

[planetgeli]

Can't make your mind up eh? First fire. Now hypoxia. Alien abduction or CIA mind ray next?

All been covered some two years back in this thread. Time for you to do some work now and go and read it properly.

I wasn't here two years ago...and fire, here, is leading to hypoxia. Do tell. I'm asking nicely. And not ridiculing you like you seem intent on doing to me. Why do you do that?

 

[a_chap]

Oh do shut up and fuck off.

 

[planetgeli]

Can't make your mind up eh? First fire. Now hypoxia. Alien abduction or CIA mind ray next?

All been covered some two years back in this thread. Time for you to do some work now and go and read it properly.

Actually, forget it. This is pretty insulting, without provocation. Your attitude is similar to many on Urban, a desire to 'win' and belittle rather than discuss. Symptomatic of Pickman's syndrome.

 

[planetgeli]

Oh do shut up and fuck off.

Haha. Nice one. Bye.

 

[2hats]

I wasn't here two years ago...

The thread hasn't magically disappeared. It's all here. You need to invest time reading it.

and fire leads to hypoxia

Please list the aircraft incidents where fire has lead to hypoxia and not either an emergency descent and landing, with mayday broadcast, or a crash within minutes.

ridiculing you like you seem intent on doing to me. Why do you do that?

Something to do with your inability to think critically and assimilate the facts? Regurgitating popular conspiraloon theories doesn't enhance your credibility.

 

[2hats]

Actually, forget it. This is pretty insulting, without provocation.

What's insulting is your failure to read everything that has been written before, particularly when people have spent the time to write (and research) extensively on the matter.

 

[2hats]

I wasn't here two years ago...

Member Since: Dec 15, 2008

 

[planetgeli]

What's insulting is your failure to read everything that has been written before, particularly when people have spent the time to write (and research) extensively on the matter.

No, no, I think you'll find what's insulting is an aggressive response to a simple request for a recap on what's gone before. I've read shit-tons on this, forgive me for asking for a resume on your posts in order to save time.

Bye. There. You won.

 

[planetgeli]

Member Since: Dec 15, 2008

Oh ffs. I haven't posted for 7 fucking years. Just because I joined in 2008 means nothing. Is that the sum of your research and interpretative powers? All the time you've spent wanking on pedantic points like this you could have just replied in a civil manner with a recap of your theory/posts.

 

[a_chap]

Didn't you agree to fuck off?

 

[Pickman's model]

Strange that you should use the word 'inadequate' Geoffrey...

...you, and your bully soul-mate are not worth the shit on my shoe and are everything that is wrong with this website.

Strange that you should use the phrase 'hasten his departure from the boards' (I'm not going anywhere fuckface)

Its almost as if you, and your bullying prat of a friend, not a real friend, you don't have any of those, but a virtual friend, its almost as if you were trying to drive away any opposition of your infantile posturing from these boards you feel a, very conservative, sense of entitlement to. Almost like that eh? For you, and this dickhead pretend revolutionary, pretend friend of yours, the one with his head up your arse, seem to think that if you follow people around, bullying them, especially women, because that's the kind of low-life you both are, you seem to think that will retain your entitlement to an internet message board, the like of which is the only place you get a feeling of empowerment from in your very fucking sad lives. Now, if Mr Strasse removes his head from your arse and inserts his dick up there, maybe, just maybe, you could both lose your virginity and the rest of us could get on with having, erm, discussion, on a discussion board, without self-centred non-revolutionary pricks like yourselves spoiling it for everyone?

i don't believe you do discussion.

 

[LDC]

Ta-da! No plane, no evidence. PS Hypoxia.

So anyway. What's your theory out of interest?

Funnily enough I don't have a personal theory either, as I know jack shit about the subject at hand and have no first hand experience of investigating missing aircraft. Much like you I suspect.. and I don't count being an investi-Googler as knowing fuck all either before you start saying you've done some 'research'.

 

[equationgirl]

It's like the nanothermite thread all over again...

 

[Cid]

No, no, I think you'll find what's insulting is an aggressive response to a simple request for a recap on what's gone before. I've read shit-tons on this, forgive me for asking for a resume on your posts in order to save time.

Bye. There. You won.

Can we have some links to the shit-tons you've read?

 

[planetgeli]

Ooh, all those crowd funded likes, an urban crowd obviously, I'm amazed you haven't all got 60000 each to rival Geoffrey Howe-Pickman.

Ive done a bit of reading. To link to all is fairly unreasonable a request, though I grant you urban specialises in the unreasonable not to mention the sycophantic. But there are two ex-pilots out of there trying to crowd fund an investigation into the theory, their theory, which I have very briefly alluded to. For which i appear to be getting this flak. Not wishing to deal with venom of certainty bred by urbanites with no ideas of their own other than the delight in triumphing in vilification of someone they wouldn't dare address in such tones away from their keyboards, and frankly having better things and people, not to mention friends Geoffrey Pickman, to, converse about and with, I'll leave this to run a little further until I delve into the pit of hell once again.

 

[Pickman's model]

Ooh, all those crowd funded likes, an urban crowd obviously, I'm amazed you haven't all got 60000 each to rival Geoffrey Howe-Pickman.

Ive done a bit of reading. To link to all is fairly unreasonable a request, though I grant you urban specialises in the unreasonable not to mention the sycophantic. But there are two ex-pilots out of there trying to crowd fund an investigation into the theory, their theory, which I have very briefly alluded to. For which i appear to be getting this flak. Not wishing to deal with venom of certainty bred by urbanites with no ideas of their own other than the delight in triumphing in vilification of someone they wouldn't dare address in such tones away from their keyboards, and frankly having better things and people, not to mention friends Geoffrey Pickman, to, converse about and with, I'll leave this to run a little further until I delve into the pit of hell once again.

go on, give us a couple of links

 

[Cid]

Ooh, all those crowd funded likes, an urban crowd obviously, I'm amazed you haven't all got 60000 each to rival Geoffrey Howe-Pickman.

Ive done a bit of reading. To link to all is fairly unreasonable a request, though I grant you urban specialises in the unreasonable not to mention the sycophantic. But there are two ex-pilots out of there trying to crowd fund an investigation into the theory, their theory, which I have very briefly alluded to. For which i appear to be getting this flak. Not wishing to deal with venom of certainty bred by urbanites with no ideas of their own other than the delight in triumphing in vilification of someone they wouldn't dare address in such tones away from their keyboards, and frankly having better things and people, not to mention friends Geoffrey Pickman, to, converse about and with, I'll leave this to run a little further until I delve into the pit of hell once again.

How to make a basic argument:

PEE (a crude yet memorable acronym).

Point: Outline your argument.
Evidence: Reference some authority for your argument.
Explanation: Explain how your authority relates to your point and draw a conclusion.

They teach this shit at KS3, stop whining and get to the fucking point Mr Howard.

 

[equationgirl]

planetgeli you're really not doing yourself any favours - even one link to a credible source would do.

You can't blame people for not accepting your arguments when you refuse to post up any links to your evidence.

 

[equationgirl]

And urban doesn't really do sycophantic, by the way.

 

[2hats]

And another suspect piece (engine cowling debris, perhaps) found on a beach in South Africa...

Source: The Guardian
Compare to:

More images here.

 

[Spymaster]

And urban doesn't really do sycophantic, by the way.

 

[existentialist]

So someone points out apparent inconsistencies and questions that need answers and gets accused of being a conspiracy theorist? How very Urban75 of you. Well done.

Alternatively, get really offended at the way people are responding to your..."brave" theories, and avoid having to explain them by refusing to co-operate with such rude and unhelpful people. HTH, HAND.

 

[existentialist]

Like I said, let's hear it then. What are the unanswered questions, and what do you think might have happened planetgeli?

"Watch this 2 hour Youtube video"

 

[existentialist]

. ugh, read datestamps.

 

[Pickman's model]

.

 

[Pickman's model]

Listing the variables and, in your own words, knowing whether or not, eg, individual plane parts were doused in bio - antagonistic fluids is not the same thing is it? Pardon me if you have such knowledge, I doubt you do. Also pardon me for not looking back through 62 pages of thread, I'll be truly grateful of you do it for me, but my point was not the Guardian nor anyone else to my knowledge was providing diagrams with Chris Morris arrows any time in advance suggesting plane parts were certain to start turning up on Mozambique and Reunion. If you have such Guardian diagrams and articles from 24 months ago, happy for you to show me. All I've seen, and what you've linked to here, are justifications 'after he event' (ie after things started showing up) for finding the flaperon on Reunion. I'm not saying those oceanographic models are wrong or made up by lizards, just pointing out that as far as I know they were only enacted to justify things once a part was found.

You need to look up what hyperbole is. It's not pulling random figures out of an orifice for the sake of it. It's a literary device to make a point. But you knew that right? You just like belittling because, having science on your side and all that, you obviously need sarcasm too right?

I have never once suggested the aircraft was lost just off SE Africa. Nor that the lizards put the parts there. But, later today or tomorrow, I will offer you, as I seem to be being pushed into it, an alternative explanation of sorts.

come on then, where is this wonderful alternative explanation?

 

[planetgeli]

come on then, where is this wonderful alternative explanation?

"Come on then"??Are you offering me a fight, LOL? Do you have nothing better to do with your life than this website you boring little man? 110,000 posts (60,000 likes! Must be doing something right!) suggests you don't.

Go find some friends.