Pickman, are you Geoffrey Howe ("like being savaged by a dead sheep") in disguise?
he's more like ian gow or airey neave: exploded. there won't be the promised 'alternative explanation'.No. Are you Michael Howard?
This bit was magnicifent.RIGHT! RIGHT! YES I AM SO RIGHT! AND YOU ARE WRONG AND THEREFORE INFERIOR AND NEED TO BOW TO MY MUNICIFENCE!
Like I said, let's hear it then. What are the unanswered questions, and what do you think might have happened planetgeli?
as i pointed out on the thread from which you quote i don't goout and seek likes. don't mean so much to me, they seem to mean rather more to you.Sorry I hadn't realised you were infinitely familiar with sarcasm.
The flaperon is indeed encrusted with barnacles. Goose barnacles suggesting, as you say, some sort of buoyancy just below the surface. And I don't think you are any the more aware of the variables you suggest than I am, which may well be explaining factors, but that doesn't stop you from putting forward your own theories regarding scattered material across SE Africa does it? Difference is you won't be seeing any sarcastic retorts from me with belittling guesses at your own expertise or knowledge of aviation physics or oceanology.
I think the circumstances of these parts now showing up are interesting and deserve further explanation, which we may or may not get. But it's easier for Urban to characterise me as suggesting I'm someone saying "the lizards did it". Pardon me for asking questions when the Guardian starts producing nice diagrams with Chris Morris type arrows showing the 'definite' ocean drifts leading to the inevitability of finding stuff on Reunion when for two years they did nothing of the sort.
As for Pickmans and his little Facebook 'likes' obsession (60,000! I must be doing something right!)....sad wankers will always be sad wankers. Still no real friends eh?
I feel obliged to award you a like for your non-like seeking behaviouras i pointed out on the thread from which you quote i don't goout and seek likes. don't mean so much to me, they seem to mean rather more to you.
no lizards. and no explanation either.I wonder why a search was carried out for three days (more?) in the south China sea when the (Malaysian?) authorities already knew a 180 had been performed by the aircraft, taking it away from any such search area. I wonder if this was some kind of deliberate delaying tactic in order to further confuse the exact whereabouts of the aircraft. I wonder if the exact search area is being searched and why it might have been removed hundreds of miles away from where originally was searched in the southern Indian ocean. I wonder if this was all to make finding the aircraft deliberately difficult/impossible. I wonder if a catastrophic fire didn't break out like happened on a similar Boeing plane on the ground at Heathrow (?) in 2007 and to which it is reported no modifications were made. I wonder if the (catastrophic) consequences for this for Boeing, which would involve crippling losses, are not being covered up.
No lizards anywhere. Just genuine questions in what is, to me and many, a very rare (in relation to the circumstances surrounding it) catastrophic event.
no lizards. and no explanation either.
Deficient Thales Pitot Tubes = Pilot Error
you promised an explanation. where is it?Er...Lynne asked me "what do you think might have happened?"
To which, I replied.
What part of reading comprehension skills would you like help with oh real life friendless one?
(Hey, you got another like! 60001!)
Later, Geoffrey. Gotta go to bed. Work early. Work. You know that word oh proletarian hero one?
i will have lots of fun with you, you sad obsessiveIsn't that an Airbus thing, not Boeing?
Really, bed now. Have fun with the last word Mr Pickford.
More a BEA thing really.Isn't that an Airbus thing, not Boeing?
Just genuine questions
Love those Guardian arrows pointing direct to Reunion. And just in case, we'll have some pointing direct to Mozambique too. There. That's solved that. Even though Reunion is a speck in the ocean and two parts of roughly 3,464,534 parts turning up direct on Mozambique (to be found by the same person?) is roughly
10 trillion to 1.
The crippling losses were visited upon MAS.
Which are nothing to the crippling losses which would be visited upon Boeing if they were found criminally negligent. Just. Saying.
Still hyperbolic. Not surprising that there is a lot of debris from a vast array of sources turning up in that region when one looks at the circulation patterns previously highlighted. There is one definite piece and two more promising candidates awaiting identification...Maybe not so hyperbolic then. (Go, point out I said Mozambique when I meant Reunion - in reference to the same bloke finding two parts).
MH370: debris found on Reunion 'unlikely' to be from missing plane
What exactly is the alleged negligence on Boeing's part?Which are nothing to the crippling losses which would be visited upon Boeing if they were found criminally negligent. Just. Saying.
very easily: they scooped up all the bits and dumped it in the remotest part of the ocean they could find.[/planetgeli]And even supposing there were some negligence on Boeing's part, how would they be able to conceal, or conspire to conceal, the evidence of a crashed plane?
What exactly is the alleged negligence on Boeing's part?
What exactly is the alleged negligence on Boeing's part?
Not just negligence on Boeing's part, but criminal negligence. Like they sneaked in to KLIA and undone some bolts holding the engines on or something.
Planes have been crashing since the very start of aviation, shit goes wrong, we investigate, we learn from it and hopefully make sure the same thing doesn't go wrong again.
So just what did Boeing do that is so bad that the normal run of things would need covering up planetgeli? Call Airbus's mum a slag or something?
yeh. but at least he's not an inadequate liar: as you most certainly are.You are almost as big a prat as your Geoffrey Howe mate. Haven't you got a woman to go bully?
Where's the evidence of any fire in this incident? What have occasional fires (which occur across airliners of all models) got to do with the disappearance of MH370?Regular fires in the avionics bays (17 alleged since 2010 and a major one on a United Airlines plane on the ground at Heathrow in 2007) and cockpits of B777's and a refusal to install fire-extinguishing equipment in the main equipment centre.
Aviation Today :: The Fire Next Time
It's not really on to insinuate someone is a bully. If you think someone is bullying on urban, you should report it to the mods.You are almost as big a prat as your Geoffrey Howe mate. Haven't you got a woman to go bully?
he would do, if that weren't more likely to hasten his departure from the boardsIt's not really on to insinuate someone is a bully. If you think someone is bullying on urban, you should report it to the mods.