Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Lost Prophets...

Is the implication that Watkin's was able to identify fans who were already paedophiles then? If we're saying that the drugs didn't cause the mother's behaviour, then they must already have been abusers. Addiction turns people into all sorts of things they weren't before.

In the case of Watkins, he was clearly already that way before he'd smoked anything Class A.
he was abusing his celebrity status, the fact that many girls and young women would do anything for him. Find someone who is vulnerable and bingo. Its the classic action of a paedophile, with or without drugs
 
Yes, I think it's way more complex than blaming it on the meth.

Of course, he stated that his plan was "turn them into Superfans" or something of that ilk. He knew that he could control and subjugate others by means of his fame. I wonder if creating drug addicts was part of his plan as well though. The desperation of a meth addict might be useful in your plans to carry out the most degrading acts possible.
 
Of course, he stated that his plan was "turn them into Superfans" or something of that ilk. He knew that he could control and subjugate others by means of his fame. I wonder if creating drug addicts was part of his plan as well though. The desperation of a meth addict might be useful in your plans to carry out the most degrading acts possible.
His sexually compulsive behaviour was paedophilia *and* hebephilia too (pedohebephilia, I'd not heard that term before) together with the power/domination/subjugation aspect of the children and mothers. Maybe as you say, the wish to dominate was also via the vehicle of drug addiction.
 
Tbf I've known ok people who turn into violent arseholes with a few beers in them so drugs do effect peoples minds thats why they take the
You'd have to be in a pretty dark place to think Teven start down that path the meth would not have been a restraining factor :mad:
 
belboid said:
because they can hold it back until they are under the control of alcohol?? Drugs deinhibit people, not fundamentally change them

Drugs do both. They deinhibit some and fundamentally change others.
 
Crystal meth or just some form of amphetamine?
"One of the earliest uses of methamphetamine was during World War II, when it was used by Axis and Allied forces.[20] The company Temmler produced methamphetamine under the trademark Pervitin and so did the German and Finnish militaries. It was also dubbed "Pilot's chocolate" or "Pilot's salt".[21] It was widely distributed across rank and division, from elite forces to tank crews and aircraft personnel, with many millions of tablets being distributed throughout the war.[22] Its use by German Panzer crews also led to it being known as "Panzerschokolade" ("Panzer chocolate" or "tankers' chocolate")."

from wiki.

methamphetamine, though not smoking crystals, but i doubt that makes much of a difference.


i think the whole drug thing is a red herring. he's just used it as a justification so he doesn't have to face up to what he has done. amphetamines often make it damn near impossible to have sex at all.
 
I dont see how they'd create a sexual desire for children

Drugs don't create desire. Paedophillia is a sexual desire like any other probably hardwired into the brain. I wonder what someone who grows up with these feelings is meant do about it.
 
Drugs don't create desire. Paedophillia is a sexual desire like any other probably hardwired into the brain. I wonder what someone who grows up with these feelings is meant do about it.

I reckon in times past a lot of the conscientious ones would have ended up in monasteries away from temptation. Maybe we need a modern secular equivalent.
 
Back
Top Bottom