The practice of the press and tv in giving up all their footage to the Met police when asked might have something to do with the attitude.
There are a lot of rumours circulating but I haven't met anyone who did either get asked or gave up their footage or photos yet - although if the BBC did then that stinks but as I said - I'm not aware of any of the freelance's being asked yet - or doing so
The NUJ have been reminding everyone that we have exceptions under PACE to cover that eventuality
There seems to be a rumour floating around that it's happening though which needs stamping on - full article here
http://www.epuk.org/Resources/958/police-photographers-and-the-law but the relevant part quoted below
Below section from EPUK re Journalists Material:
As a journalist, are my photographs afforded any special protection?
Section 14 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) states that journalistic material is subject to the rules of Special Procedure Material.
This section also applies to material acquired or created in the course of any trade, business, profession or other occupation or for the purpose of any paid or unpaid office where it is held subject to an express or implied undertaking to hold it in confidence.
Generally, once your images are recorded, the police have no power to delete or confiscate them without a court order. However, see above regarding s.51 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001.
In terrorist cases, e.g. where police contact starts with a search under section 43 Terrorism Act 2000, a police officer of at least the rank of superintendent may issue a search warrant (without court order) if there exists a “great emergency” and “immediate action is necessary.” This only applies to terrorist cases, not investigations of other criminal offences.
In many cases therefore, the production or seizure of images will require a court order. This should only be granted in circumstances where there are reasonable grounds for believing that the material is likely to be of substantial value to that investigation; and where there are reasonable grounds for believing that it is in the public interest for the material to be disclosed, having regard to the benefit likely to accrue to the investigation, and the circumstances under which you had the material in your possession.