Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Liz Truss’s time is up

the other day you were on about dr coffey drinking and smoking, and deriding her for that. now you're suggesting that - on the basis of your extensive experience, no doubt - that liz truss is mentally ill. you're very big on tory health. perhaps if you imagine the hapless truss less as a mentally ill woman and more as someone who realises too late that they've achieved a position for which they have neither talent nor capacity, with all the stress and unhappiness for them that might entail, you might be nearer the mark. i don't know what it is with you and having a pop at tories for what you think about their health, when you might better attack their competence and indeed their politics. perhaps you'll tell me.

Well, yes. I do actually have personal experience, on a daily basis my friend. That's my job. They all know she's fucking nuts and can't wait to be rid of her. They all know she's going to lose them the next election by a landslide. Granted this is the Cameron/Osborne/Sunak side of the party, which is a completely separate party in reality but yes - it's accepted internally that 'we're fucked' in the words of my boss. (and I can assure you I'm not part of the 'we')

She did come across as unhinged today, sorry.

Not sure what your point is here. I assume we both share the same goal, to get rid of the Tories, so we're in a conundrum. Let this idiot fuck up the country for two more years or let or her fuck the Tory party for two more years making them unelectable. Which is your preference? I think on reflection I'd prefer a competent leader at this terrifying moment but that could possibly mean the Tories getting back in. So. yes. We're fucked.
 
I don't doubt that there are significant numbers of city types who'd actively approve it if the UK government announced a programme of targeted public investment covered by relatively modest tax rises. That's an actual growth plan.

It's the kind of thing the social democratic govt of Portugal has been trying to do recently. The markets haven't exploded on them for it.
The investment side had support.. Keynesian stimulus is actually what was wanted by big financial institutions at the time.
But renationalising utilities would not have gone down well, and I don't know what bankers would've done in response but I'm sure it wouldve sounded like squealing and looked like a graph going down somewhere
 
Sorry, in case I need to say once again, I don't actually work for the Tories but I had to take something during lockdown and so currently work for a company closely affiliated with them. And it has actually been fascinating to observe the shitshow from the inside as a bit of a politics geek.

It totally is the thick of it. But there are incredibly smart people working in there, objectively. A lot of whom disagree wholeheartedly with what Truss is doing. Both economically and socially. She's nuts.
 
Well, yes. I do actually have personal experience, on a daily basis my friend. That's my job. They all know she's fucking nuts and can't wait to be rid of her. They all know she's going to lose them the next election by a landslide. Granted this is the Cameron/Osborne/Sunak side of the party, which is a completely separate party in reality but yes - it's accepted internally that 'we're fucked' in the words of my boss. (and I can assure you I'm not part of the 'we')

She did come across as unhinged today, sorry.

Not sure what your point is here. I assume we both share the same goal, to get rid of the Tories, so we're in a conundrum. Let this idiot fuck up the country for two more years or let or her fuck the Tory party for two more years making them unelectable. Which is your preference? I think on reflection I'd prefer a competent leader at this terrifying moment but that could possibly mean the Tories getting back in. So. yes. We're fucked.
if it's your day job then i'm really surprised you've decided that your best arguments against the tories are your health secretary drinks and smokes and your prime minister's mentally ill. unhinged. nuts. mental illness being such a broad range of things perhaps you could outline just what you think's wrong with her, as it's your area of expertise.

anyway getting rid of the tories is such a paltry aim if the succeeding government is going to be shammer's labour party.
 
Sorry, in case I need to say once again, I don't actually work for the Tories but I had to take something during lockdown and so currently work for a company closely affiliated with them. And it has actually been fascinating to observe the shitshow from the inside as a bit of a politics geek.

It totally is the thick of it. But there are incredibly smart people working in there, objectively. A lot of whom disagree wholeheartedly with what Truss is doing. Both economically and socially. She's nuts.
and unhinged, i hear
 
It wouldn't have happened. McDonnell made sure to be speaking to the City &c so even if they didn't agree with what he was planning they knew what to expect and would have been able to prepare. Kwarteng blindsided everyone.
The Labour manifesto in 2019 was fully costed - perhaps relying on some optimistic economic forecasts, but not too concerning to the markets - until they promised to compensate the WASPI women, which would've cost another £58bn, blowing a hole in all their budget forecasts. If they'd gone ahead with a £58bn black hole in their budget then the markets would certainly have reacted badly. That policy undid all the work Macdonald had done to reassure the markets that Corbyn's Labour was not a threat to their investments.

The markets only care about getting a return on their investments. They don't really care what governments do as long as their investments are safe. They get jumpy when left wing governments are elected as left wing governments should be hurting their investments. Allende, for example, nationalised the copper mines without compensation - about as bad for investors as it could get - and the markets reacted punishingly to that.

Markets are usually reassured by right wing governments as they've traditionally been there to protect the market's investments, at whatever human cost. Truss, with a £60bn black hole in her budget, borrowing billions to pay for the energy price cap when UK borrowing is already high following Covid, relying on fantasy growth to be able to cover the cost when only about 3 people in the world think her trickle-down plan will work, has made the markets think their investments aren't as safe as they'd assumed and they reacted. If she and Kwarteng had announced plans to pay for the energy price cap and tax give away which would've worked financially, such as huge cuts to public spending - ending the state pension, funding the NHS through insurance - the markets wouldn't have batted an eyelid.
 
Would Tory MPs really vote against their own party and cause an General election knowing full they would face losing their seats and a potential wipeout of the party?
Voting no confidence in your own government is a de facto resignation from the party I guess? It's just Pesto stirring though isn't it.
 
Would Tory MPs really vote against their own party and cause an General election knowing full they would face losing their seats and a potential wipeout of the party?

They wouldn't cause a General Election though - the no confidence is in her government, so if they call one and the government loses the Crown asks if someone else can form a government. Given that they have a majority of nearly 80, they almost certainly could form a new government without needing an election immediately.

Also "facing losing their seats and a potential wipeout of the party" isn't as much of a threat when that is what is going to happen if she remains in power.
 
Back
Top Bottom