ska invita
back on the other side
i would imagine banking is much different now to how it was in 1945Labour in 1945.
could do with a more modern example
i would imagine banking is much different now to how it was in 1945Labour in 1945.
I really need to be doing some work, but knock yourself out:could do with a more modern example
What does that last line mean in the contact of the preceding paragraphs? Where is this political opposition coming from? And political as opposed to what, economic?Markets are amoral, impersonal and only care about the performance of investments. If the prospects look good money flows in, if the prospects look bad money flows out.
..........
The political opposition to renationalisation is a different issue.
We’ve entered another realm (watch the video in the first reply if you havent seen it)
But not the LancetBut he is on the cover of the Rolling Stone.
Chavez was the most recent one i could think of
The discussion started with what 'the markets' will allow, prompted by comparing the market reaction to Truss/Kwarteng's mini budget and a hypothetical Corbyn government.What does that last line mean in the contact of the preceding paragraphs? Where is this political opposition coming from? And political as opposed to what, economic?
Even old Cumberland Digits is treating her with contempt.
11:22 here:
Kwasi Kwarteng says ‘let’s see’ when asked about potential U-turn on corporation tax – as it happened
Chancellor does not rule out increasing corporation tax when asked about whether government will perform U-turnwww.theguardian.com
I agree, though there's a chance windsor doesn't like women who cling onto positions of power.The significant thing isnt what Charles said, because its just a mode of speech and how to deals with awkward moments. The significant thing is that the media are able to seize upon it and cast it in that way - another demonstration, as if one were needed, of the perilous position Truss finds herself in, and how the press scent blood.
It's probably just the pose she's in when the photo was taken, but that's at least the second image I've seen of truss doing a composite bow/curtsey. There's also a chance the photo edtors are choosing the precise moment that makes her look a complete div.The significant thing isnt what Charles said, because its just a mode of speech and how to deals with awkward moments. The significant thing is that the media are able to seize upon it and cast it in that way - another demonstration, as if one were needed, of the perilous position Truss finds herself in, and how the press scent blood.
I agree, though there's a chance windsor doesn't like women who cling onto positions of power.
I think it depends on your own social rank too. My understanding is that Earls and Dukes can do ‘pull my finger’ when meeting a monarch, as long as they follow it with a deferential “better out than in ‘ey?”Anyway, my etiquette advice for any Urbanites who didn't go to finishing school: shake hands and then bow, don't do them at the same fucking time!
Anyway, my etiquette advice for any Urbanites who didn't go to finishing school: shake hands and then bow, don't do them at the same fucking time!
I'd like to be pulling a lever attached to some rope myself.If I ever get to a point I meet the monarch I like to think I’m turning my back.
I'd like to be pulling a lever attached to some rope myself.
I rue the day they began televising Parliament and it all became about entertainment rather than informing the publicPMQs is always a terrible way to measure the performance of the PM, but it's good to see its in line with the skills she's shown since coming power in....[checks google]....oh good, 36 days ago.
As her political career will atest, she never needed anyone's permissionDoes she need the king's permission to continue being a disaster?
I rue the day they began televising Parliament and it all became about entertainment rather than informing the public
Tbf to Truss on this one point only, what a curtsey and a bow look like has changed several times through history and she's the Prime Minister, if she curtseys like that a) it'll likely catch on and b) anyone with half a brain doesn't give a fuck anyway. It's not like a curtsey is an actual thing.It's probably just the pose she's in when the photo was taken, but that's at least the second image I've seen of truss doing a composite bow/curtsey. There's also a chance the photo edtors are choosing the precise moment that makes her look a complete div.
Criticism also came from the Financial Times, which said Truss had presided over “Britannia Unhinged” – a reference to the book titled Britannia Unchained she wrote with Kwasi Kwarteng and other free-market backbenchers in 2012.
In addition to the scorn poured on Truss by the national press, the editor of an influential website within the Tory party – Conservative Home – said there were doubts about whether the mini-budget could survive at all.