She's taken to twitter and, rather impressively, sounds just as wooden and ill-informed in that medium:
Reckon they could all have sat in 'spoons and do fuck all and those numbers would have looked the same.that's quite a conference bump for the labour party huh?
Also posted in Political Polling thread; she's achieved something quite remarkable there, tbf:
Some tory 'grandee' like John Redwood for exampleThe problem is that surely the Tories will get rid her of well before of the GE and bring in someone, anyone, slightly more intelligent and electable
All tories have unreal ambitionsThese are not really numbers a quick change of leader and the Mail running a few headlines can totally fix. Would you even want to try and fix this if you were Sunak? Better to leave it to someone else to get wiped out at the next GE and swoop in afterwards I'd imagine. No-one with real ambitions is going to want to take over.
31.6% of them; the real fucking headbanger noddysWhat's the betting the tory leadership election process will get a re-jig after this fiasco. That being said, it was the MPs who let an obvious catastrophe like Truss on the ticket for the members' vote in the first place.
It's certainly a theory which could be explored. Brexit was almost certainly assisted by outside forces, be they Russian or Steve Bannon/Trumpian or both. Brexit supporters were beyond desperate to get Truss on the ballot. She has the appearance of a woman "in power but not in charge". Who is behind the door to number 10 really?I reckon truss is a putin bot, put in place many years ago to sabotage the UK in event of just the sort of situation we now face
This was just about the time that austerity measures were starting to kick in so that cuts were having real world effects in communities, so let’s say winter 2010/11 . I was in a pub with some friends and not everyone knew each other. I got talking with the woman sat beside me and it turned out she was a lawyer working fairly high up within the Financial Services Authority. l asked her “I‘m curious, now that austerity measures are starting to have an effect on people‘s daily lives, how is that-“ and she interrupted me and said “The question doesn’t make sense.”
I was a bit annoyed and tried again. I wanted to ask if there was any awareness of, any concern about, any sense of recognition of the anger and distress the policy was causing. “So the people you’re working with, the ones who’ve framed this policy, do they think the effects will-“ and again she just cut across me, said. “The question doesn’t arise.”
I thought she was being arrogant and said “Just let me ask the question”. So she did, but I could see that she was humouring me. I framed it as “Are they not concerned that the anger and distress their policies cause may play out badly for them?”
And then she said “You don’t get it. Your question does not make sense. The question of how people feel about their policies does not arise.” I just kinda looked at her, because while I knew she was telling me something true, I didn’t want it to be so. I mean, I’d always known this on some level but to hear it stated so simply by someone who works with them was unsettling.
Then she said “This is the thing that most people don’t understand. People, you and me and all of us here, we don’t exist for them. Not even in abstract terms. We are statistics, numbers in a formulae, not people. They don’t give us any thought because we don’t exist for them. The question do they consider the effects does not arise. However you frame it, your question makes no sense.”
I almost wish she'd waited a bit longer to fuck this up so spectacularly. Sunak's the obvious replacement and he could actually win. I mean, it's been two weeks or something like that right to mangle shit up more than any PM in living memory.
These are not really numbers a quick change of leader and the Mail running a few headlines can totally fix. Would you even want to try and fix this if you were Sunak? Better to leave it to someone else to get wiped out at the next GE and swoop in afterwards I'd imagine. No-one with real ambitions is going to want to take over.
I think ideas around 'leaving it until next time' don't really hold up. It's 8 years until that opportunity... No ambitious person is going to play on those terms. And the reality of it is that what the world will be like next time is hugely unpredictable. The situation here and now presents an obvious opportunity for someone like that... It's a hellishly tricky one for sure, but you don't become a career politician without a great deal of self belief. And in all honesty just doing what the BoE and IMF say will cause some bounce back immediately as markets rally... Throw in some light populism (as he did with e.g eat out to help out), emphasise a return to 'economics without ideology' emphasise stability and a return to the old normal. 2 years is ample time to rebuild the tory base.
Who were the "them" she was talking about, exactly?
Are you sure? They still have a majority and none of them are going to want to call an election.the tories are totally fucked. They are going to loose all but their most wing nut supporters and funders. There is no coming back from what they have done.
the tories are totally fucked. They are going to loose all but their most wing nut supporters and funders. There is no coming back from what they have done.
21% of respondents want more of this.