Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Lib Dem Polls - How Low Can They Go?

No, he means the latest YG tracker - YG being the only people doing a daily tracker. I'm sure if the tracker is saying something different in 5 months time (6% maybe) then i'm sure the thread title will once again be updated to reflect that.

And don't start getting ratty because you can feel the peoples anger at your back. 34% to 10% in 6 months. Astonishing.

The thread has cherry picked the lowest tracker store to date. YG's polling is rubbish, 34% was ludicrously high and 10% is too low. 16% is the latest ICM poll which is still a drop to be concerned about.
 
Bpix also have the lib-dems on 10%. Comres have you on 14%. Why cherry pick the highest? The pol in the OP was the YG tracker, as is the now repeated 10% figure. Seems consistent to stick with YG doesn't it? You can't cherry pick the current figure btw - it just is. It's the current figure.

Tell us why the YG figure is a joke. What's your criticism of their methodology?
 
Bpix also have the lib-dems on 10%. Comres have you on 14%. Why cherry pick the highest? The pol in the OP was the YG tracker, as is the now repeated 10% figure. Seems consistent to stick with YG doesn't it? You can't cherry pick the current figure btw - it just is. It's the current figure.

Tell us why the YG figure is a joke. What's your criticism of their methodology?

It's limited to people with computers and they apply their own disclosed formula to the statistics for weighting purposes - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ele...ollster-gives-Labour-an-unfair-advantage.html

They consistently show Lib Dem support as being lower than any of their competitors.
 
It's limited to people with computers and they apply their own disclosed formula to the statistics for weighting purposes - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ele...ollster-gives-Labour-an-unfair-advantage.html

They consistently show Lib Dem support as being lower than any of their competitors.

No it's not! You don't think them opt-in joke polls are what they base their tracker on do you :D

And no, the current YG weighting is due precisely to YG giving the lib-dems higher results than the reality was - the current highest ones are from ICM who also similarly overestimated the lib-dems prior to the election but have not chnaged their methodology since. That even they say you're fucked means you probably are fucked.

That link has nothing to do with the posts here - it's about labour and it's about a now discarded set of weightings and other criteria.
 
No, it's restricted to people with access to computers - at one time this was a legitimate criticism, but now, with libraries, and internet cafes and workplaces, and day centres all offering internet access, it is not valid.

Ok so you think there is no problem with access to computers for the poor or ethnic minorities. Maybe you are right and this is no longer problem, which is a good thing.
 
Lib Dems had a by-election win in the Mole Valley from Conservative, my prediction will be losses against Labour and gains against the Conservatives for next May. It won't be the totatl election wipe-out some like Butchersapron would like it to be.
 
Lib Dems had a by-election win in the Mole Valley from Conservative, my prediction will be losses against Labour and gains against the Conservatives for next May. It won't be the totatl election wipe-out some like Butchersapron would like it to be.

Er, your vote collapsed in the urban areas at the same time - Swansea, Oxford, St Helens, Sheffield - did you miss that?
 
Lib Dems had a by-election win in the Mole Valley from Conservative, my prediction will be losses against Labour and gains against the Conservatives for next May. It won't be the totatl election wipe-out some like Butchersapron would like it to be.
why on earth would tory voters in their heartlands switch to LD, when there's practically no difference between the 2 parties now, and they might as well vote for the real McCoy? And given that your spiel of 'we're the only way you can turf the tory out' is now toast, why would anyone else in those seats vote for you?
 
Er, your vote collapsed in the urban areas at the same time - Swansea, Oxford, St Helens, Sheffield - did you miss that?

Nope I just said I predict there will be losses against Labour, so this is consistent with votes falling in urban areas. Labour are targeting Lib Dem votes at the moment, although it won’t be enough to win an election as they also need to win back those people who voted Conservative at the last election.

I suspect a few years of pain whilst the CSR is going through then an upturn with the economy increasing.
 
why on earth would tory voters in their heartlands switch to LD, when there's practically no difference between the 2 parties now, and they might as well vote for the real McCoy? And given that your spiel of 'we're the only way you can turf the tory out' is now toast, why would anyone else in those seats vote for you?

There are many reasons to vote LD locally, you only have to look at the polices the Lib Dems are putting through in the coaltition to see there is a distinctive difference between the parties.
 
There are a range of issues from Capital Gains Tax, Inheritance Tax, Pupil Premium to electoral reform that shows having LDs in the coalition is better than a Conservative government.
eh? there is agreement between the government and the labour party on the subject of eg capital gains tax. you're spouting bollocks again.
 
There are many reasons to vote LD locally, you only have to look at the polices the Lib Dems are putting through in the coaltition to see there is a distinctive difference between the parties.

none you can actually thionk of tho. God, you're doing an abysmal job of dfending the indfensible.
 
FFS. I voted LD, I think that's on record so there's no point denying it..

That was naive. But to carry on defending the fuckers now is just... I dunno. Stupid? That doesn't seem strong enough somehow. By a loooong way.

The party is dead. They had a lot of support from 'natural' Labour voters who were pissed off about Iraq etc. That was the source of their 'emergence'. Those voters will never touch them again, not even with a shitty stick. The Lib Dems are fucked, they are irrelevant.
 
FFS. I voted LD, I think that's on record so there's no point denying it..

That was naive. But to carry on defending the fuckers now is just... I dunno. Stupid? That doesn't seem strong enough somehow. By a loooong way.

The party is dead. They had a lot of support from 'natural' Labour voters who were pissed off about Iraq etc. That was the source of their 'emergence'. Those voters will never touch them again, not even with a shitty stick. The Lib Dems are fucked, they are irrelevant.

Fair play to anyone who voted LD for these reasons and now takes this line.
 
There are many reasons to vote LD locally, you only have to look at the polices the Lib Dems are putting through in the coaltition to see there is a distinctive difference between the parties.
Not taht old 'it would be far worse without us' bollocks!
yes, but whatever you mean in one locality, nationally you're putting through a raft of policies which reek of thatcherism, I mean one can barely get a fag paper between you and the tories - so why not vote for the real thing?
 
Does moon23 really think that YouGov just ask people to fill in online questionnaires and not, you know, weigh them against demographic data and adapt their model against previous results?
 
Not taht old 'it would be far worse without us' bollocks!
yes, but whatever you mean in one locality, nationally you're putting through a raft of policies which reek of thatcherism, I mean one can barely get a fag paper between you and the tories - so why not vote for the real thing?

Sorry this is bollocks there are lot's of the best polices to emerge from the Coalition that are only there becuase of the Lib Dems. Delay of trident, pupil premium, AV vote, increase of minimal tax bracket, increase in CGT, retaining inheritance tax.

People should be proud they voted for these polices and are seeing them enacted.
 
Does moon23 really think that YouGov just ask people to fill in online questionnaires and not, you know, weigh them against demographic data and adapt their model against previous results?

No I don't so don't paint some shitty straw man that suggests I do, I’ve already posted up an article where polling experts and academics take issue with some of their algorithms so it’s obvious I know they apply things to weigh them.

Next time try actually reading the thread.
 
There are a range of issues from Capital Gains Tax, Inheritance Tax, Pupil Premium to electoral reform that shows having LDs in the coalition is better than a Conservative government.

without the Lib Dems there would be no Conservative government.
 
Back
Top Bottom