danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Nae bother.Sorry, thanks for clarifying.
(James Bray, btw, is a Newsnight producer).
Nae bother.Sorry, thanks for clarifying.
Hate to say i agree with this:
The full data breakdown is up on YouGov already.
https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/08/10/corbyn-pull-ahead/
He's blitzing all comers in every membership category.
Narrowly loses on those who were labour members before miliband took over as leader - 48-52. Overwhelming
Well, unless they fix it then it looks like he has it, surely?
loads of info (and I' m not one of his supporters) are you stupid?No info on when he is coming to Sheff?
again - pretty easy to find out FFSwhen is the voting and how long does it take?
when is the voting and how long does it take?
loads of info (and I' m not one of his supporters) are you stupid?
- Tuesday 9 June 2015 – Nominations open
- Monday 15 June 2015 (12:00) – Nominations for the Leader close
- Wednesday 17 June 2015 (12:00) – Nominations for the Deputy Leader close
- Wednesday 17 June 2015 (12:00) – Hustings period opens
- Friday 31 July 2015 (12:00) – Supporting nominations close
- Wednesday 12 August 2015 (12:00) – Last date to join as member, affiliated support or registered supporter and be able to vote
- Friday 14 August 2015 – Ballot papers are sent out
- Thursday 10 September 2015 (12:00) – Ballot closes
- Saturday 12 September 2015 – Special Conference to announce the results
I like the way that, the more top labour brass and ex-brass warn against voting for Corbyn, the more people are seeming to decide to vote for him.
The poll questioned 1,411 people eligible to vote in the contest.
It says even fully-fledged Labour members - who've increased from 200,000 to 270,000 since May - would vote 49% in favour of Mr Corbyn.
Registered supporters who've paid £3 to vote are 55% for Mr Corbyn, while affiliated trade union supporters would vote 67% for the left-winger.
He's also more popular with women (61%) than men (48%).
Similar to the other candidates in that regard though. For Burnham amongst his own supporters, it's still 11% and he's the lowest. Amongst Corbyn supporters, they think Corbyn is the most likely to win.19% of Corbyn supporters don't think he's likely to win the next election, but are going to vote for him anyway.
That's probably a worrying statistic as those will be the people who're most likely to be able to be scared into voting for someone they're told is more electable, and that's a big enough proportion of his support base to really put it on a knife edge.
Would the Labour Party actually put their principles before electing someone they viewed as being more electable? Possibly this time because only a tiny majority think that Burnham is likely to win it, and most of them are only in the fairly likely to win it camp, so they're not really buying the idea that any of the others are particularly electable.
Nope. He has 53% support for first preference votes in that poll. 51% of ABC1 and 57% of C2DETher is an oddity in the data I don't understand. Corbyn exceeds 50% for both ABC1 and C2DE. this surely isn't possible given that his total is less than 50%. Or is there another category than A-E?
So he does. I was looking at the first column with 43 rather than the second with 53.Nope. He has 53% support for first preference votes in that poll. 51% of ABC1 and 57% of C2DE
Is it someone's nap time?Yawn!
Yeah, there is a massive irony in three candidates that can't muster 50% between them telling the one that has more than 50% by himself that *he* is the unelectable one...
if they read that poll - and don't dismiss it out of hand - they really should start to shut the fuck up about 'infiltration' as it (to the miserly extent it actually exists) is obviously irrelevant to the result. Shits like Sheerman cant be stupid enough to not realise that every word they say pushes more people to Corbyn, and the more he just fucks off that majority of existing Labour members who will vote for him.Yeah, there is a massive irony in three candidates that can't muster 50% between them telling the one that has more than 50% by himself that *he* is the unelectable one...
Have you seen the shoddy Liz Kendall ones?The Andy Burnham leadership video is terrible.
Have you seen the shoddy Liz Kendall ones?
I was going to say exactly thatHave you seen the shoddy Liz Kendall ones?