Luke Savage @LukewSavage 3 hrs3 hours ago
@Harryslaststand I have never in my years of observing politics seen a slander campaign on the same scale as Project Stop Corbyn. #JezWeCan
Old Harry is so right.
Luke Savage @LukewSavage 3 hrs3 hours ago
@Harryslaststand I have never in my years of observing politics seen a slander campaign on the same scale as Project Stop Corbyn. #JezWeCan
standing room only in Leeds from the looks of it.
(should have gone I guess, but knackered)
Are those god rays JC coming through for the meeting
It's Lord Anthony Wedgewood Benn pronouncing 'this is my son, in whom I am pleased'Those rays are sometimes called "Jacob's Ladder"; a journey in quite the opposite direction, how symbolic.
Its interesting that the attacks on Corbyn - well the ones that go beyond "Urggh! Beard and sandals Stalinist lunatic!" are focusing on his anti-austerity position ("to win labour needs to be credible on the economy" etc) - which is a position lot of people agree with and potentially a load more could be persuaded on.
What I haven't seen mentioned much is the stuff that would probably stop him winning an election - withdrawal from nato, scrapping trident, being seen as "soft" on immigration and "terrorism". Come a general election - this is what the tories and the media - and UKIP - will be crucifying him on.
Paul Flynn, MP for Newport West, who is backing Liz Kendall, said he welcomed Green party members registering as Labour supporters. Flynn said he had been a member of the Ecology party before it became the Green party in 1985, as well as being a Labour member.
a quick search shows that Corbyn sponsored this early day motion in the spring.Has corbyn said anything attacking drug prohibition? Now or in the past.
That this House commends Health Poverty Action's report of February 2015, Casualties of War: How the War on Drugs is harming the world's poorest, which highlights how the predominant drug policy of prohibition has undermined attempts to tackle poverty and improve health; notes that this is confirmed by evidence presented in the report of January 2015, Drugs and Development: The Great Disconnect from the Global Drug Policy Observatory at Swansea University; is concerned at the alarming violence fuelled by the increased militarisation of repressive responses to the drugs trade; acknowledges the opportunity afforded by the UN General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) on Drugs in 2016 to help the poorest and most marginalised; and calls on the Government to recognise that drug policy should be treated as a health and development issue, not a crime and security issue, and to advocate this approach at UNGASS.
Has corbyn said anything attacking drug prohibition? Now or in the past.
So I see that Corbyn is the bookies' favourite now
yep, Millibands sop to them to prove he wasn't in hoc to the unions I think.Wasn't OMOV and the £3 entry fee an idea from the blairites? LOL.
Don't think those like figures are as good as you do. That's partly because most of the 43k lined up against him are likely to vote for the other blairites as second choice (though he'd get some of burhams if he was eliminated). Other thing is the other candidates' likers are indeed much more likely to already be registered.Thing is at every meeting that JC does hes got a hundreds of people signing up to labour to support him. Hes got over 50k "likes" in his facebook page. I expect their will be a big push to get those people to register over the next few days as the deadline approaches.
That may be enough to push him over the line - I wonder how many people are joining to vote for the insipid three? Andy Burnhams has 17k facebook likes, Coopers 20k, Kendals 6k - and im guessing these will be from within labours existing membership whears Corbyns is going beyond that.
Wasn't OMOV and the £3 entry fee an idea from the blairites? LOL.
If Corbyn doesn't win hes going to be pretty bloody close.
yep, Millibands sop to them to prove he wasn't in hoc to the unions I think.
Though I do wonder if whoever was responsible for sorting it out actually knew what they were doing.
Hoisted by their own petard, hopefully.
JC has 2 pages though, each with well over 50k likes.Don't think those like figures are as good as you do. That's partly because most of the 43k lined up against him are likely to vote for the other blairites as second choice (though he'd get some of burhams if he was eliminated). Other thing is the other candidates' likers Are much more likely to already be registered.
A clearer picture of the figures has been obtained by Sky News.
Labour: Half Eligible To Vote Are New Sign-Ups
There are currently around 270,000 members of the Labour Party, of which 200,000 were members before the election.
In addition, 70,000 have joined as affiliated supporters (mainly through trade unions) and 50,000 have paid £3 to sign up as a registered supporter. That’s a total of 190,000 people joining up since the election.
I think it's likely that the vast majority of that 190,000 are Corbyn voters. On the other hand the vast majority of the 200,000 pre-election membership will be anti-Corbyn. It's going to be tight.
What makes you think this? The constuency parties that have been nominating Corbyn won't have been packed with new members - my own Labour friends & acquaintances round (by no means a majority of left-wingers) are overwhelmingly voting for him.On the other hand the vast majority of the 200,000 pre-election membership will be anti-Corbyn.
I suppose it's largely just anecdotally that the Labour members I've been talking to are mainly all against him. I've seen plenty of support for Corbyn but mainly from trade unionists. I'm also just being pessimistic. You make a fair point about the CLPs.What makes you think this? The constuency parties that have been nominating Corbyn won't have been packed with new members - my own Labour friends & acquaintances round (by no means a majority of left-wingers) are overwhelmingly voting for him.
Yes - but far from cleanly split. Everyone on that side is sure that Kendall won't win and I reckon will be swinging behind Burnham/Cooper as first and second in either order.Except that the neo-lab constituency is split 2 and a half ways.
well, the constituency noms suggest otherwise. I fully expect a number of people to be scared by the relentlessly negative press Corbyn has been getting into voting 'pragmatically' for Burnham or whatever, but there certainly isn't an overwhelming majority of long-time members against him.I suppose it's largely just anecdotally that the Labour members I've been talking to are mainly all against him. I've seen plenty of support for Corbyn but mainly from trade unionists.