Indeed.There's certainly no parliamentary road to socialism, that's for sure.
I'm hesistant to talk about this, because it will look like I think that it's worth continuing to pour hope into Labour, and I really don't.There's certainly no parliamentary road to socialism, that's for sure.
Yes. Maybe not next time round (it is still far too early to say). But it always swings back eventually.
By this measure the Tories get what, three?It doesn't though, does it?
That's point.
Two, just two, clear victories from opposition since WWII.
You are saying that people are going to vote Tory after what they have done to the Country with Brexit? Anyone who isnt a millionaire and who votes Tory is a what?
By this measure the Tories get what, three?
Hard to tell the scale of damage on the horizon (the Torys have spent a lot more than i expected them too), but we could be in a vaguely 1945 situation by the next election. Materially its potentially a golden opportunity for Labour, and you'd expect the Tories to be quite battered and bruised by then.1945 & 1997.
It doesn't though, does it?
That's point.
Two, just two, clear victories from opposition since WWII.
What have you seen about PR? Is it just people wishing we had it?Seen a couple of things cropping up again about PR
I agree it may take a while. How many elections exactly i don't know. But eventually enough people will get pissed off with the tories.
I don't see any other party with a realistic chance. The voting system favours the 2 main parties (in england anyway) and the lib dems and ukip have both collapsed and there are no other parties with large vote shares so i don't see any "rainbow coalitions" happenning any time soon. It's a Guardian fantasy.
Yep, the only party with the likely heft to get Labour clearly over the line is the SNP. We all know what their price would be.
I've heard this same question ever since...1983. Usually posited by either Tories who (secretly, to themselves) want a one party state or by liberals who see the question as an excuse for arguing Labour should be more like the Tories.
Yes of course they'll win another election, in time. And yes, probably when they're almost indistinguishable from the Tories.
My point is more whether, actually, there's any point in them being more like Tories. It still won't win them elections.
Blair seemed to do nicely off it.
I'm not sure I understand your 'any point' bit. If electoral success is the be all and end all then yes there is a point.
To people like me, and probably you, Labour doing their best Tory impersonation is pointless as far as policy goes.
Yep. Yes they will. It doesn't need to be that many either.
Is electoral success down to them shifting right? or is it down to a period of Tory rule running it's course and a general need for the "reset" of a different ruling party for a bit?
That's what I'm wondering.
B) but only if A) is in place.
It depresses me to write this.
ClearlyCorbynism was clearly not a vote winner