Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

knife violence and murders among youth

DotCommunist

So many particulars. So many questions.
Further to a derail on another thread, this week sees yet another fatal stabbing. I read this piece and thought it made some interesting points. The pervasiveness of violence in young mens lives, the 'logic' of weaponry. All too familiar from working class male upbringing.
Adolescents | Richard Seymour on Patreon

Whether or not the violence of adolescents ends, the violence of adolescence usually does. Not always and not immediately, but it winds down. The struggle for survival and social position changes gears after secondary school. It stops being about who can batter whom at least, for most people, one-on-one. The tempo of social violence shifts. It stops being so omnipresent. It becomes more avoidable. Helplessness is, by increment, reduced. Boys are being murdered, or becoming murderers, in squalid circumstances in tube stations and chicken shops before they get the chance to find this out.
 
Where do you go though? Other than legalise and regulate the drugs market. Cos at the end of the day, these killings are about the drugs market.


But you can't get a sensible debate on legalising drugs.

You can't get a sensible debate on the current carnage; LBC this morning Ferrarri commends caller who went: Not allowed to discipline kids ----> not allowed to educate them ----> National service ----> death penalty

:rolleyes:
 
Where do you go though? Other than legalise and regulate the drugs market. Cos at the end of the day, these killings are about the drugs market.


But you can't get a sensible debate on legalising drugs.

You can't get a sensible debate on the current carnage; LBC this morning Ferrarri commends caller who went: Not allowed to discipline kids ----> not allowed to educate them ----> National service ----> death penalty

:rolleyes:
Twitter and FB is full of people thinking that a permanent Section 60 stop and search policy is the way to fix things.
 
Knives are very easy to obtain and it's difficult to regulate in the same manner as guns.
A cultural change towards less lethal weaponry and sanctioned areas for them to beat seven bells out of each other might be a start.
 
the Drug market is the main mover of this thing the amount of cash available raises the stakes and being on something offer lowers your rationality.
most of the rest is fallout by wannabes trying to get in with a gang or seeing them as role models so stupid arguments become lethal.
the weird thing about knives it's very easy to kill when you didn't intend too quite hard to stab someone to death quickly and quietly though:eek:.
One of those pass the time lessons that got really interesting SAS Sgt reckoned silenced pistols were overall a much better choice than fucking about with blades.:eek:.
militarily if you end up having to kill someone with a knife things have really gone tits up and the guy bleeding out hours later isn't really going to help you.
 
I am sure that at the extreme end of the problem then drugs and the drugs trade will make things worse and the easy profits from the trade will ensure that it is protected by extreme violence but I am not so sure that the drugs trade is ultimately the problem . I grew up in a relatively respectable part of Essex and in my young teens was witness to and at times party to casual violence , it wasnt drug related is was territorial . Later it drifted into football violence , again not drugs related but tribal . Drugs were out there but it wasnt the cause .
 
Knives are very easy to obtain and it's difficult to regulate in the same manner as guns.
A cultural change towards less lethal weaponry and sanctioned areas for them to beat seven bells out of each other might be a start.
yeh, back in the 90s there were regular fights in north finchley on a friday and saturday night, large scale affairs too, involving a couple of dozen or more people, by the auld bus station. quite gentlemanly affairs, you could watch from quite close quarters without being dragged into the event. sadly stopped after someone got killed (run over, not stabbed)
 
Where do you go though? Other than legalise and regulate the drugs market. Cos at the end of the day, these killings are about the drugs market.


But you can't get a sensible debate on legalising drugs.

You can't get a sensible debate on the current carnage; LBC this morning Ferrarri commends caller who went: Not allowed to discipline kids ----> not allowed to educate them ----> National service ----> death penalty

:rolleyes:
IME a lot of the kids suppplying drugs actually provide an essential income stream to their impoverished families. This is what needs to be tackled if the gang-related knife crime is to stop. They're fighting over crumbs, tbh not unlike our political overlords. You don't generally get ripped off by these kids - they know that there are 10 others waiting to take their place.

As I may have mentioned before, I'm not against gentrification per se so long as the people already in the area have real opportunity to also raise their level concurrently. This is something that will take a huge shift in economics that the country may not yet be ready for.
 
It would have been a surprise if 'austerity' hadn't seen a rise in violence, tbh.

Difficult to discuss in mainstream political debate because the law and order types will point to the poor kids not 'turning to crime' and seek to highlight the individual moral failings of those who do. And they would of course be partly right - being poor doesn't 'turn you into' a criminal. It just makes the rewards of such a turn far more appealing. Lots of poor kids don't turn to crime. But funnily enough a lot more rich kids don't.

Bleeding obvious point really, but it does get shouted down on the likes of Question Time.
 
As I may have mentioned before, I'm not against gentrification per se so long as the people already in the area have real opportunity to also raise their level concurrently. This is something that will take a huge shift in economics that the country may not yet be ready for.
Urban regeneration without gentrification is what is needed. And for that, essentially you need social housing, and lots of it.
 
Urban regeneration without gentrification is what is needed. And for that, essentially you need social housing, and lots of it.
Social housing doesn't fix the problem on it's own, especially in these days of housing associations and increasing social rents. Something needs to change about the lack of income streams and opportunity as well.
 
Social housing doesn't fix the problem on it's own, especially in these days of housing associations and increasing social rents. Something needs to change about the lack of income streams and opportunity as well.
Lack of social housing is a huge part of why people are forced out of areas to be replaced by more affluent types, and is the driving force behind gentrification - people are forced out of the area because they're a million miles away from buying, they stand zero chance of a council flat, and private rents are going through the roof. Especially somewhere like London, where you'll be paying, say, 700 quid a month for a room in a house even in a cheaper area. Social housing with a proper social rent, of course - I'm not talking part-rent part-buy cons or anything like that. Properly affordable social housing would raise the effective income of a great many people by stopping private landlords from stealing their wages.
 
Lack of social housing is a huge part of why people are forced out of areas to be replaced by more affluent types, and is the driving force behind gentrification - people are forced out of the area because they're a million miles away from buying, they stand zero chance of a council flat, and private rents are going through the roof. Especially somewhere like London, where you'll be paying, say, 700 quid a month for a room in a house even in a cheaper area. Social housing with a proper social rent, of course - I'm not talking part-rent part-buy cons or anything like that. Properly affordable social housing would raise the income of a great many people while stopping private landlords from stealing their wages.
A lot of the violence is from families who haven't been forced out - rather it's the children of families who have been ghettoized in increasingly affluent areas.
 
A lot of the violence is from families who haven't been forced out - rather it's the children of families who have been ghettoized in increasingly affluent areas.
Social housing doesn't solve all problems, but I am suggesting that it does solve the current problem, which stretches back years now, whereby urban regeneration inevitably leads to gentrification, and that is destructive in many different ways.
 
Social housing doesn't solve all problems, but I am suggesting that it does solve the current problem, which stretches back years now, whereby urban regeneration inevitably leads to gentrification, and that is destructive in many different ways.
I'm not denying that it would help solve some of the current issues. However, I feel that systemic issues to do with lack of opportunity and betterment are also essential to solving the problem. With boys especially, there isn't the 'out' of getting pregnant and thus getting housed, for example. If you can never afford your social rent if you work, why bother, etc...
 
Also if crime means your littler brothers and sisters have shoes that fit and access to a playstation, and even that your family has enough electricity in the meter - well that's an attractive prospect that brings a lot of self respect.
 
Also if crime means your littler brothers and sisters have shoes that fit and access to a playstation, and even that your family has enough electricity in the meter - well that's an attractive prospect that brings a lot of self respect.
Absolutely. Sorry to be clear, I was replying specifically to your gentrification point. I don't agree with you that gentrification isn't a bad thing in and of itself. I think it really is, and the trick has to be to improve areas while preventing it from happening.

There are all kinds of things that need to be done to change the structures of society. That's one. Increasing investment in youth services is another - currently they are being decimated. A complete change in attitudes towards the criminalisation of drug-taking is another. Further reform of the racist police force and its racist policies is another.

Or... bring back the birch/borstal/national service, etc, etc, etc.
 
Urban regeneration without gentrification is what is needed. And for that, essentially you need social housing, and lots of it.

Some degree of influx will be a good thing in some cases (for instance, doctors, nurses, schoolteachers moving into the area), but on the broad point, yeah.
 
Back
Top Bottom