Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Is it possible to bet on the next election yet? Curious what odds I'd get on less than 100 seats for Labour.
Ask Ladbroke's. It seems to prepared to take such bets.
I think you will lose your bet. I think the turnout will be low at the next General Election, but the Labour Party will not go below 100 seats.
 
No sign yet of the More Efficient Government than the tories that we were promised :hmm:

You'd think there are loads of opportunities to make society fairer without even spending government money. Rent controls for example could be a great leveler, but of course there are so many landlords in parliament so that won't happen.
Well, rent controls was not in the Manifesto, so it would be undemocratic to introduce something that people have not voted for. Rent controls would not only be of benefit to both workers and employers, they would lead to lower state exependiture on Housing Benefit.
 
Didn't Tony Blair's lot introduced something like 25000 new laws between 1997 and 2008? Or is that just some conspiracy crap I picked up at the time? I haven't checked - but there's a BBC page listing all the Acts passed between 1997 and 2006 and it's mind-bogglingly long...


I certainly expect more of the same from an ex-DPP
Do not all governments pass laws? Is that part of what they see as their job? Are not a lot of these laws simply, in theory, improving existing laws?
 
Do not all governments pass laws? Is that part of what they see as their job? Are not a lot of these laws simply, in theory, improving existing laws?

Maybe, but whatever they were, Blair's government/s passed a record number from what I recall. Possibly by quite a large margin, too.
 
". Labourwill ensure the next generation cannever legally buy cigarettes andensure all hospitals integrate ‘optout’ smoking cessation interventionsinto routine care. Labour will banvapes from being branded andadvertised to appeal to children to stop the next generation frombecoming hooked on nicotine"
Nothing about banning smoking in the open air.
 
Party manifestos have no legal or constitutional standing. If a policy was absent from the manifesto, it may (but in practice is unlikely to) influence whether that policy gets parliamentary support when enacted into law.
isn't there a House of Lords convention that the Lords doesn't try to block measures that were in the manifesto? Which just means it can take longer for non-manifesto policies to wind their way through the system into law.
 
isn't there a House of Lords convention that the Lords doesn't try to block measures that were in the manifesto? Which just means it can take longer for non-manifesto policies to wind their way through the system into law.
Yes, there is. Like a lot in the UK system, it's not written down anywhere but it's quite a strong convention. Seen as undemocratic of the Lords to block manifesto commitments.
 
No sign yet of the More Efficient Government than the tories that we were promised :hmm:

You'd think there are loads of opportunities to make society fairer without even spending government money. Rent controls for example could be a great leveler, but of course there are so many landlords in parliament so that won't happen.
It's August. Not the month to get stuff done.

Rent controls now ended up here in Scotland....leading to the inevitable massive rent hikes
 
Smoking raises about as much in duty as its estimated it cost costs the NHS. Charity parachute jumps cost the NHS 3 times the money they raise
IMO smoking taxes raise many times over what smoking costs the NHS.

Years ago I did the calculation, and since then smoking taxes have gone way up.
 
he was in germany yesterday....gave a speech. Guess what, he's going to stop the rise of the far right - when pressed on how exactly he answered:
"I do think in the end, delivery is the way forward. It’s about a disaffection in politics, the easy answer is appealing if people don’t think there’s a better answer, and so progressives have to provide the better answer.”

"delivery is the way forward" ... Delivery..... Meaningless managerial bullshit....Clueless indeed. He wouldn't know the "better answer" if it was written on a card in front of him.
Historically, the far right grows under social democratic governments. Inasmuch as Starmer is of that ilk, and bereft of a positive vision, there is nothing he can ‘deliver’ that will prevent this.
 
Starmer heaps praise on Thatcher as he woos Conservative voters



keir-thatcher-1080p.png


"My party extends the hand of friendship to those who voted for the Tories but feel let down by their failure to act ..."



Voters have been betrayed on Brexit and immigration. I stand ready to deliver
46661310-6656-11ef-b970-9f202720b57a.png


keir-thatcher-1080p.png


He can always put this one up instead.​
 
But is that measure the right one? Is the cost to the nhs the only cost to society?

The financial cost to the NHS isn't the only financial cost to society and, as I think your post was intended to suggest, the financial cost isn't the only cost to society as a whole.

But I think the net financial cost to society and the way that reductions in the number of people smoking affect that cost are both factors that governments would be interested in calculating, if only because measures to reduce smoking might increase those net costs, at least in the short to medium term
 
Not sure which thread to post this on. But this is the kind of shite popping up in my YouTube feed. And it is certainly not the kind of things I search for.
This is external influence of some kind. Just a shame, in this post truth world, we have no idea where from.
 
Back
Top Bottom