Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

My thinking on Starmer and centrism and their likely success.

Two electoral advantages Starmer gives the LP:

1) He doesn't firm up the Tory vote. Viewed as relatively harmless.
2) He's building an informal alliance with the Lib Dems and we're now seeing a lot of tactical voting against the Tories.

I don't think centrism is where the general public are but it does have its tactical advantages. I think the Tories are without a chance next GE but the medium to long term picture for both main parties is pretty dire IMO. The core vote for both is decaying.
 
I think it depends on who they pick, but I think Labour might just win because the red wall seats will be back with labour imo
The problem with that assumption is that it doesn't take account of voting behaviour in that people mostly vote * for * someone or something.

They previously voted for Labour in the working class former industrial North because of heritage/tradition, working class loyalty to the Labour movement.

Then they voted Conservative because they were 'similarly' voting for the (white) working class, and to take back our sovereignty from Europe and 'make Britain great again' etc. And Boris is a bit of a lad, a bit of a lark, very popular and populist.

Except now it's maybe dawning on them that the working class is screwed every which way. The saviours of the 'hard working families' haven't really saved or helped them, much. Yes, some people might've benefited from furlough or grants for small businesses etc during the pandemic, but lots of people fell through the gaps. And many would've realised that the life of Reilly they thought 'benefits scroungers' were living while they toiled was actually pretty fucking grim and involved lots of scrimping and saving and doing without. Although many who already knew about 'in work poverty' went from struggling to relying on food banks, and choosing between heating or eating.

But what does Labour have to offer those subsisting below the poverty line on benefits and those hard working families who now find themselves struggling more than ever before?

Starmer's neither popular not populist. He's not a man of the people like Corbyn. He's not a jack the lad who people might vote for because he's funny on telly like Johnson.

When you think about how many tens, hundreds of thousands of people died needlessly because Johnson was a knob who talked to the media about how he was 'shaking hands with Covid patients' and wasn't man enough to implement lockdowns or cancel Christmas - for other people, he was partying behind the scenes all along - until it was all too late. And all the corruption and sleaze...

...Labour should be absolutely soaring ahead in the polls, should have been for months. But Starmer can hardly score even when there's an open goal at PMQs.

And Starmer's either a policy vacuum - doesn't want to play Labour's hand too early - or the pronouncements he does make amount to out-Torying the Tories. Don't want to scare big business. Doesn't want to side with trade unions or working people who've had wages freezes or below inflation pay rises for years, real-term pay cuts.

He's not giving people anything to vote * for * so I reckon turnout will be lower, because those who voted Tory last time probably won't jump straight back to Labour. They've broken that bond. They don't owe Labour their vote.
 
My thinking on Starmer and centrism and their likely success.

Two electoral advantages Starmer gives the LP:

1) He doesn't firm up the Tory vote. Viewed as relatively harmless.
2) He's building an informal alliance with the Lib Dems and we're now seeing a lot of tactical voting against the Tories.

I don't think centrism is where the general public are but it does have its tactical advantages. I think the Tories are without a chance next GE but the medium to long term picture for both main parties is pretty dire IMO. The core vote for both is decaying.
Denying free school meals to a large number of children is not harmless
 
Likely they don't want it tied to UC - which does make some sort of sense. But given there's zero communication from them about it, we're left to wonder if they're complete and utter cunts, or just ordinary run-of-the-mill cunts.
Better kids tied to UC get it than nobody gets it though. They could have voted Yes and then lobbied to get it more widely applicable. Cunts' trick.
 
Oh god, it's all so shabby and inadequate. What is wrong with him? It's all so fucking faux British. What is wrong with all of them? :mad:
 
Back
Top Bottom