Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Opposing striking workers only makes sense in the idea of a politics that is nothing more than breaking with everything that went before under Corbyn, some kneejerk attempt at getting commuters and the mail on board. But even within the mental confines of building some kind of centrist brand within which to oppose the tories it makes no sense. It forgets that Labour had policy successes under Corbyn, around public services and social protection, even if that was presented as an uncoordinated mishmash in the 2019 election. Even as some kind of awful timid centrist party, there has to be some kind of vision of a new kind of economy and use of the state to make people's lives less shit. It wouldn't be my politics, but at least they'd be starting to peel back the notion that neo-liberalism and boss power are inevitable. Essentially, Labour are sprinting away from the kind of politics that are precisely what is needed at the moment.
 
Starmer's making a bad (and ideologically guided) miscalculation about strikes, I think. He can get away with opposing one strike and denying that he's against strikes in principle. But we're going to have a slew over the next 12 months, and, even in 2022, it's not a line the leader of the Labour party can possibly hold. He's fucking himself.
Given the hoops you have to go through to have a legally mandated strike not supporting one thats met the threshold is basically saying you support making it even harder to strike
 
Just looked at their website. Seems they’re offering flexible working and a £10/hr minimum wage, by 2030. :thumbs:

Perhaps by election time they’ll come up with a manifesto with some actual meaningful policies.
Wot after Brown fought and won in court that a manefesto isn't binding... And Milliband had a giant tombstone that wasn't set in stone
 
Opposing striking workers only makes sense in the idea of a politics that is nothing more than breaking with everything that went before under Corbyn, some kneejerk attempt at getting commuters and the mail on board. But even within the mental confines of building some kind of centrist brand within which to oppose the tories it makes no sense. It forgets that Labour had policy successes under Corbyn, around public services and social protection, even if that was presented as an uncoordinated mishmash in the 2019 election. Even as some kind of awful timid centrist party, there has to be some kind of vision of a new kind of economy and use of the state to make people's lives less shit. It wouldn't be my politics, but at least they'd be starting to peel back the notion that neo-liberalism and boss power are inevitable. Essentially, Labour are sprinting away from the kind of politics that are precisely what is needed at the moment.
Did nobody notice the double repetition? Had you buzzed in you'd have had the rest of the minute on 'Why Labour is Shit'.
 
What exciting new policies to make this country better can we expect from the Starmer clique?

Make Armed Forces Day a Public Holiday

Mandatory Union Jack for All Publicity Photos

No Labour MP Allowed within a 100 Mile Radius of a Picket Line

Bring Back the Lighthouse Family

Twin the Annual Labour Conference with An Israeli Settlement in Hebron

Exile Corbyn to Mars

Can't wait!
 
In my view the uselessness of Labour right now has been cemented in with the slogan ‘make Brexit work’.
Brexit isn’t defined, and ‘leave’ risks a return of conflict in Ireland.
 
Why would Starmer be expected to stick by the 2019 manifesto, or have a new manifesto out now, two years before an election? No love for him or expectations of anything good from his leadership, but these seem odd things to get worked up about.
 
Why would Starmer be expected to stick by the 2019 manifesto, or have a new manifesto out now, two years before an election? No love for him or expectations of anything good from his leadership, but these seem odd things to get worked up about.
if you get elected on that platform it is generally assumed not to expire after a couple of years because it's inconvenient. would starmer have been elected on a manifesto more to his liking? i suspect so: but think he'd have been joined by a smaller caucus of labour mps
 
But a manifesto is a programme for government, which the Labour Party decisively failed to form in 2019 - there was no demands or expectation that Corbyn push on with Miliband's failed policies was there?
 
Why would Starmer be expected to stick by the 2019 manifesto, or have a new manifesto out now, two years before an election? No love for him or expectations of anything good from his leadership, but these seem odd things to get worked up about.


I think people are more cross about the dumping of the 10 pledges he made when running for Labour leader. For example;

7. work shoulder to shoulder with trade unions to stand up for working people, tackle insecure work and low pay. Repeal the Trade Union Act. Oppose Tory attacks on the right to take industrial action and weakening of workplace rights.

Does show him up to be the unprincipled liar, no?

Oh here's another

An immigration system based on compassion and dignity.

....but he won't rule out continuing the Rwanda policy.
 
Why would Starmer be expected to stick by the 2019 manifesto, or have a new manifesto out now, two years before an election? No love for him or expectations of anything good from his leadership, but these seem odd things to get worked up about.
He said he’d ‘build on’ the 2019 manifesto not dump it entirely. It’s just another example of his leadership campaign being built on complete lies.

As to having a manifesto, he certainly doesn’t need a full one but he needs to lay out a few things that Labour will do differently, Blair certainly did.
 
That's something to challenge him about for sure. But that's not what people are apparently cross about today.
I suspect it's because he ran as a continuity and unity candidate pledging to retain much of what the membership liked in the 2019 manifesto, but has reneged on all his pledges and now talks about a "clean slate" in terms of manifestos and policies. The anger about the manifesto is fuelled by the previous mendacity.
 
I think people are more cross about the dumping of the 10 pledges he made when running for Labour leader. For example;



Does show him up to be the unprincipled liar, no?

Oh here's another



....but he won't rule out continuing the Rwanda policy.
he's just going to be more efficient than the conservative & unionist party.
 
Back
Top Bottom