Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Keir Starmer has sparked a row in the Labour party by launching a shadow cabinet reshuffle as his deputy was giving a major speech attacking “corruption” by the government.

Allies of Angela Rayner insisted that while she met the Labour leader between her broadcast round on Monday morning and her speech at 11am, she was not told the reshuffle would be imminent or consulted about any of the details.


One Rayner ally said Starmer would have been fully aware the reshuffle would “blow up” her attempt to lay out plans for reforming the standards system and said it was “not fair”. A second said she had been “gazumped” and complained at the “utterly bizarre” timing.

However, other senior Labour sources disputed Rayner had been “blindsided”. One shadow cabinet minister insisted “she definitely knew”. Another insider said Rayner met Starmer in his office on Monday morning and was told directly the reshuffle would be taking place that day.

Cat Smith, a shadow Cabinet Office minister in Rayner’s team, was the first person to announce they were resigning. She suggested Starmer had offered her the opportunity to remain in her existing post, but that she had raised concerns about several issues, including the failure to restore the whip to Corbyn.

In her resignation letter, Smith described herself as “one of our few remaining ‘red wall’ Labour MPs”. Starmer has put winning back red wall seats at the heart of his plans for
the party.
 
The discussions over Israel/Palestine are very often proxies for the huge differences in politics that exist across the Labour Party spectrum. I wish more of the debates were about those differences more directly, rather than that one conflict being the nexus that brings together a load of things that the right and left of the party disagree on. I think it's reached a point where it's not benefiting either side to use Israel as the proxy constantly, and it's not benefitting Palestinians as far as I can tell. You don't think the government should sell weapons to governments bombing civilians? Say that, and use all the examples available. You don't want your government supporting other governments that treat other people as lesser human beings? Say that and use all the examples available. Etc etc.

It's certainly very distressing for people who believe those actions are terrible to share a party with people who are fine with them, but the idea that anyone is doing the Palestinian people any good with this intense focus on Israel is a bit delusional I'm afraid. Yes, solidarity is good, but so is strategy, and there is zero strategic plan for the left of the Labour Party to help the Palestinian people at the moment or at any time in the forseeable future.

Always one of my less popular opinions, so do get the deckchairs out bystanders...
 
Keir Starmer carried out a wholesale overhaul of his shadow cabinet on Monday, bringing Yvette Cooper back on to the frontbench as part of a ruthless shakeup widely viewed at Westminster as accelerating Labour’s shift to the centre under his leadership.

Cooper, who served in the last Labour government, will shadow Priti Patel as home secretary, resuming the spiky interactions the pair have had in Cooper’s current role as chair of the home affairs select committee.



Other significant moves include a promotion for David Lammy to shadow foreign secretary, while Lisa Nandy will face Michael Gove as shadow levelling-up secretary. The radical reshuffle, which blindsided Starmer’s own deputy, left almost no senior role untouched.

“The Labour party I lead is focused on the priorities of the country,” Starmer said. “With this reshuffle, we are a smaller, more focused shadow cabinet that mirrors the shape of the government we are shadowing. We must hold the Conservative government to account on behalf of the public and demonstrate that we are the right choice to form the next government.”

He lavished praise on Nandy, whose shift from shadow foreign secretary to the levelling-up brief would traditionally be regarded as a demotion – though levelling up is politically prominent because it is at the heart of Boris Johnson’s agenda, and the Wigan MP has previously been a strong voice on tackling regional inequalities.

“After 11 years of Conservative mismanagement of our economy, delivering prosperity to all regions and nations in the UK will be a defining mission of the next Labour government, and there will be nobody better than Lisa to lead this work,” Starmer said.
 
Shadow Secretary for Levelling Up? Is 'Levelling Up' even a thing? I just assumed it was some vague, nebulous Tory blag that they never needed to explain or show examples of, but can be wheeled out whenever someone points out the shocking state of the country they've ruled over for 11 years.

Not that this dismal collection of dullards Labour is expecting us to turn out and vote for will offer anything more hopeful.
 
Shadow Secretary for Levelling Up? Is 'Levelling Up' even a thing? I just assumed it was some vague, nebulous Tory blag that they never needed to explain or show examples of, but can be wheeled out whenever someone points out the shocking state of the country they've ruled over for 11 years.

Not that this dismal collection of dullards Labour is expecting us to turn out and vote for will offer anything more hopeful.
It's a re-branded version of the ministry for housing and communities. Officially renamed in September with Gove's appointment.

 
Shadow Secretary for Levelling Up? Is 'Levelling Up' even a thing? I just assumed it was some vague, nebulous Tory blag that they never needed to explain or show examples of, but can be wheeled out whenever someone points out the shocking state of the country they've ruled over for 11 years.

Not that this dismal collection of dullards Labour is expecting us to turn out and vote for will offer anything more hopeful.

Levelling up means no to wealth redistribution. The revisionist Starmer clique are happy to let the Tories frame the agenda.
 
importantly, the pissy headline bribes to northern seats have not been scraped together by 'screwing' london out of some cash. that's not how it works
 
The discussions over Israel/Palestine are very often proxies for the huge differences in politics that exist across the Labour Party spectrum. I wish more of the debates were about those differences more directly, rather than that one conflict being the nexus that brings together a load of things that the right and left of the party disagree on. I think it's reached a point where it's not benefiting either side to use Israel as the proxy constantly, and it's not benefitting Palestinians as far as I can tell. You don't think the government should sell weapons to governments bombing civilians? Say that, and use all the examples available. You don't want your government supporting other governments that treat other people as lesser human beings? Say that and use all the examples available. Etc etc.

It's certainly very distressing for people who believe those actions are terrible to share a party with people who are fine with them, but the idea that anyone is doing the Palestinian people any good with this intense focus on Israel is a bit delusional I'm afraid. Yes, solidarity is good, but so is strategy, and there is zero strategic plan for the left of the Labour Party to help the Palestinian people at the moment or at any time in the forseeable future.

Always one of my less popular opinions, so do get the deckchairs out bystanders...
I would have loved hearing your mid-1980s views about boycotts and South Africa . Or maybe not.
 
Levelling up just means "Research into ways we can hang on to constituencies that voted for us just because of Brexit, without upsetting Tory papers or spending much money, given that we haven't found a way to make the terf thing work and there's no way the prime minister is wearing a flat cap."
 
Back
Top Bottom