steveseagull
Well-Known Member
Incoming
Omara was in a completely different part of the city, he is meaningless. This ward is adjacent to mine.That's more the Jared O'Mara effect than anyone caring what KS has to say, imo.
Incoming
Sorry brogdale but KB is right.Yes, that's a fair point; obviously small turnouts at ward level are only ever of limited value in discerning the bigger picture, but they can give clues about the geography of support and they do represent real voters actually bothering to put a cross in the ballot paper box....so I think I will continue to post any that catch my eye.
On the more macro scale, I see that Britain Elects (NS) have today published their latest modelling for Westminster outcome based on tracker polling etc.
That's fine and I'm not that fussed about the issue tbh...not a biggie either way.Sorry brogdale but KB is right.
The mis-use of council by-election results was crap when used against Corbyn, it is crap when used against Starmer.
These are contest that the vast majority of people simply don't care about. Council results are not really a good predictor for Westminster when you have the full council elections, trying to use by-elections like these is building on sand.
Looks like itSo, ditching Miliband’s OMOV and back to the 3thirds electoral college, then?
Apparently before the next NEC...more of the ruthless right.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer will re-open a bitter internal dispute just days ahead of his party's conference. In a risky move, he'll try to convince trade unions to back a plan to scrap the leadership rules which enabled predecessor Jeremy Corbyn to get elected.
Currently grassroots members elect the leader - a system introduced by Ed Miliband.But Sir Keir wants to return to an "electoral college", which would ordinary Labour Party members would only account for a third of the votes in a future leadership contest
There can be no socialism in the democratic socialist party.Just . How is that ever going to be passed?
Not much democracy either, if Starmer gets his way...There can be no socialism in the democratic socialist party.
by finding a way to bribe Unison, GMB and USDAW leaderships to nod it through. No chance otherwise and they'll need all three.Just . How is that ever going to be passed?
Should someone tell Keith he is building the gallows for his own execution? The guy is an absolute idiot.
The kinnock strategy.depends really what he's there for.
destroy the party and get a peerage from that twat johnson? plan on course...
Keith is going in proper hard on the Jews now
it is also worth noting that the vast majority of Jews living in Britain today are descendants of this immigration wave. Jewish socialists and trade unionists took their ideas — including their Bundist ideas — with them wherever they went (see, for example, the case of Clara Lemlich in the US). Their settlement in Britain coincided with the emergence of our Labour Party and trade unions as a major political force, a development to which these immigrants and their children made a significant contribution.
There can be no socialism in the democratic socialist party.
This is what I am wondering? He needs the big unions on his side right? Why would they vote for this?Just . How is that ever going to be passed?