Did you read ska invita's thread? There's lots of stuff in there about what people wanted from an independent Scotland. Lots.interesting. Nothing's changed since 2006/7, nothing since you bickered with CR in 2013 about your rather different views of nationalism, no re-evaluation by Yes voters since it was all thrashed out before Sept 2014. ok, tvm.
Oh. Well, did you take into account that many of us were not trying to create a neoliberal economy? That oil, for example, is actually something of which many of us think we should be planning for the diminution? That Yes groups like Women for Independence, RIC and Commonweal are continuing to have packed meetings and new set up projects. That there are real practical things to come out of the Yes movement, like the food solidarity campaign that donates food parcels to benefits sanctioned claimants? And so on?yes, all 207 pages. I even contributed slightly to it. It's the changes in peoples thinking since then I'm interested in. What with changes in external circumstances and all.
That's stretching the definition of contributionyes, all 207 pages. I even contributed slightly to it. It's the changes in peoples thinking since then I'm interested in. What with changes in external circumstances and all.
yes. Is it now your position that that represents the views of 45% of the voters?
All I've been trying to understand is whether people who are not you personally have shifted their positions since the oil price collapsed.
yes. Is it now your position that that represents the views of 45% of the voters?
All I've been trying to understand is whether people who are not you personally have shifted their positions since the oil price collapsed.
All I've been trying to understand is whether people who are not you personally have shifted their positions since the oil price collapsed.
Exactly. The press and the BBC were transfixed by the oil. But that was them.Why would they have?
Oil is far from the main motivator for independence for a great many people!
I can't see that embedded tweet, Weeps, is it this:
fundamentally, yes, thank you all. It's a few months on from the vote and there's a changed economic climate, it's not a forgone conclusion that Yes opinion would have solidified. It seems to have done both here, which I sortof trust, and in opinion polls (um, somewhat more ambivalent about). That's positive, I'd have thought.Is that what newbie doesn't understand? Why we've not just shrugged and gone back to UK business as usual?
I think the referendum got a lot of people who were demoralised and thoroughly not interested in politics thinking 'well actually, maybe we could do this'. This is what I'm picking up from various groups and campaigns. Even some No voters were thoroughly disgusted at the lies and underhand tactics used by Better Together. I don't know if you saw the shut up and eat your cereal ad(think it's in the thread danny linked to) but that really pissed a LOT of people on both sides off.
A lot of people have 'woken up' again and realised there IS a better way and it's worth trying to bring it about. Westminster has become more and more corrupt/incompetent and right wing in the last 20ish years and more and more people all over the UK want no part of that.
I wish that were the case but on the face of it I'm pretty sure that there's more chance of achieving the sort of change you outlined above in your neck of the woods than across the whole UK.I think the referendum got a lot of people who were demoralised and thoroughly not interested in politics thinking 'well actually, maybe we could do this'. This is what I'm picking up from various groups and campaigns. Even some No voters were thoroughly disgusted at the lies and underhand tactics used by Better Together. I don't know if you saw the shut up and eat your cereal ad(think it's in the thread danny linked to) but that really pissed a LOT of people on both sides off.
A lot of people have 'woken up' again and realised there IS a better way and it's worth trying to bring it about. Westminster has become more and more corrupt/incompetent and right wing in the last 20ish years and more and more people all over the UK want no part of that.
That's exactly why we are carrying on trying to achieve change here rather than take on board the idea that if it ain't happening across the whole of the UK then it ain't happening and give up.I wish that were the case but on the face of it I'm pretty sure that there's more chance of achieving the sort of change you outlined above in your neck of the woods than across the whole UK.
Did you bam him up for the lols?
I think most of the questioning and chin rubbing is a lack of awareness that just because we are seen as still part of the UK post indyref it doesn't mean that we have to put up with the Westminster policies that are inflicting serious damage on the lives of many.
We WANT do to everything we can stop, mitigate or change them in Scotland.
Why shouldn't we.
Can I ask if A4E, Serco and all the other 'training' groups get contracts in Scotland, and would this happen still if Scotland went indie?
I realise much of the info about happenings in Scotland you may hear/read come from the MSM that spin us all to look like mad, ranty, cybernat, SNP members and worse.no reason
I dunno about questions from anyone else but from me it's down to you having something going on up there that I only know about from afar. It's interesting.
Being a small country with limited seats we can see who is who from the borders to the Isles. Unlike over the border where people in the Lake District will perhaps have no clue who is MP for a constituency on the South coast.