FridgeMagnet
Administrator
Shouldn’t really come as a surprise. It is kind of the basis of one of the most well known political comedies in the UK....
I know this is a throw away comment but I think it's worth using as a jumping off point because it ties together number of the points under discussion.
There is sometimes an idea that during the post-war consensus you have the state being dominant over capital, while since the 70s the reverse has increasingly implied, indeed in this model it is often the withering of the state that has allowed neo-liberalism to occur. So under both the post-war consensus and under neo-liberalism you have the state vs capital, but in both cases this is false. In fact both arrangements required a partnership of the state and capital, and rather than a withering away of the state what we see is an increasing alignment, even synthesis, of capital with the state. Under the post-war consensus the state was integral in developing the skilled workforce required by capital at the time. Under neo-liberalism the state is still crucial to capital, see belboid's example of the bail out of the banks under Obama. That exploitation of labour is not in spite of the state but via the state.
The post-war consensus if not an ideal was at least a model for social-democracy, but that is no longer possible (at least IMO and no one has argued otherwise). Likewise, the Scandinavian countries were typically invoked as models by social-democrats, but they have not been isolated from neo-liberalism either. If the state is not an escape route and you are intent on limiting yourself to working through it, by insisting on legality (so no illegal council budgets, no exportation of banks) as some on this thread are, where do you go? I don't see anywhere else than remaining the managers of cuts to public services, to attacks on workers, etc.
Sorry if I sounded sarky I wasn't meaning to be. Just that your post helped crystallised my thoughts.Yes, it was a throwaway comment but I welcome you illuminating some salient points regarding the intertwined world of State and Capital.
Sorry if I sounded sarky I wasn't meaning to be. Just that your post helped crystallised my thoughts.
A facebook friend has discovered this masterpiece. I dont know where it comes from. Or who the women with the enormous knockers is. But I felt urban would appreciate it. I really hope its some sort of commemorative plate so i can buy it.
I think the strategically placed rose over bazooker women's nipple is a nice touch. keeps the whole thing tasteful.
WTF is that? So many questions.A facebook friend has discovered this masterpiece. I dont know where it comes from. Or who the women with the enormous knockers is. But I felt urban would appreciate it. I really hope its some sort of commemorative plate so i can buy it.
You’ve been doing “extensive research” to find nude photos of Michelle O’Neill? I am lost for words.i guess the artist must have been working from a photograph - but i cant find it on the internet despite a lot of research.
You’ve been doing “extensive research” to find nude photos of Michelle O’Neill? I am lost for words.
yeh rightI merely seek the truth in the public interest
might it be jess phillips?
no, might it be jess phillips in the picture?Dunno - has she done any other paintings? We could compare use of pigment and brush stokes.
no, might it be jess phillips in the picture?
i think she's playing judith to auld corbo's holofernesOh I see - how silly of me.
but she said she was going to stab corbyn in the front.
According to 'our boys'...yes...
Thomas Mair CommandoOf course its paras.