Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

Full adoption of the IHRA and examples. If they were going to just end up doing it anyway, why not do so months ago?
 
So much for the new NEC, looks like a shite time for freedom of speech from where I'm standing.
 
Lets hope this issue is put to bed once and for all, but I doubt it.
I doubt is as well. It's not going to be allowed to go away all the while that Corbyn is at the helm. I feel it incumbent upon me at this point to say my main interest in the Momentum project is seeing something somewhat more socialist-leaning happen in this country and if that means having Corbyn in charge for now I'm ok with that. For now. Tbh I am more concerned on their position wrt to the likes of Putin and Assad.
 
AFAIK It's not the new NEC who decided this - the NEC members elected yesterday don't take their positions until the Labour Party conference later in the month.
So the new NEC can change this? Isn't this something members should vote on? My understanding was that that was what was going to happen? Maybe it still is?
 
So technically, at the moment, a certain criticism of Israel can get you booted out of the party, unless the new NEC changes things? Or will there be a membership vote?
 
In the way that the issues at the root of this are still there.

The three strands I referred to in this post are unaffected. All that has happened is that Labour has been forced to adopt a definition of antisemitism complete with examples that are open to interpretations that close down debate and, frankly, justice.
It probably marks something close to the end of this particular media campaign, though it will go on a bit longer as various people say it’s not enough and that the fact it took this long means they’re antisemites. Obviously the attacks will move on to something else though and won’t stop.

I think it’s probably made a slight difference to perceptions of the real problem in that as well as those who don’t give a shit but want to attack Corbyn, and those who don’t give a shit but want to defend him, there will also be some people who say “you know there’s a problem I didn’t realise existed here, even if it’s been used for political reasons I’m going to pay attention”. Also labour people may be a bit more wary about who they promote - even if this is just for self serving PR reasons it might help in practice, as long as they’re able to distinguish who to avoid at all which is not guaranteed.
 
One of the problems was JC not standing up to Livingstone and Livingstone walked. There is the Willsman Issue still lurking in the background which I suspect will help keep this ticking over.
 
So technically, at the moment, a certain criticism of Israel can get you booted out of the party, unless the new NEC changes things? Or will there be a membership vote?
The examples are explicitly just examples - the wording of the definition allows for context. However, hardly anyone seems to notice the context bit, so it's likely it will have a chilling effect on discussions around Israel & Palestine regardless.

Fairly sure that you can see an immediate example of this chilling effect in the way when Netanyahu came out with a load of shit that could have come straight out of Mein Kampf the other day, hardly anyone made that comparison despite it being totally appropriate in that case.
 
Back
Top Bottom